In: Nursing
Outcomes:
Select one of the following topics:
Research and write a 3 page paper on your topic. Present all sides of your topic. The goal of this project is for you to select a topic that you know little or nothing on and research all sides of that issue. As a student, your are not stating your own personal opinions or experiences but rather researching credible information from a variety of sources and presenting it in a neutral, fact based manner.
Format:
Paper will be 12pt font, double spaced, must complete full three pages (not 2.5, etc) for full points WORTH 100 POINTS
Male circumcision risks vs benefits :
Introduction - Over view :
Circumcision is the surgical removal of the skin covering the tip of the penXs . The procedure is fairly common for newborn boys in certain parts of the world, including the United States. Circumcision after the newborn period is possible, but it's a more complex procedure.
For some families, circumcision is a religious ritual. The procedure can also be a matter of family tradition, personal hygiene or preventive health care. For others, however, circumcision seems unnecessary or disfiguring.
In this brief report, I highlight the why the circumcision done globally ,various types of medical procedure ,risk and benefits.
Why its done globally :
Circumcision is a religious or cultural ritual for many Jewish and Islamic families, as well as certain aboriginal tribes in Africa and Australia.
About 25-33% of the total world male population is circumcised.In the US, an average of a million newborn males are circumcised yearly.Circumcision rate in US is as high as 70%, while in Britain it is 6%. In Nigeria, circumcision rate is estimated to be 87%
Circumcision can also be a matter of family tradition, personal hygiene or preventive health care.Sometimes there's a medical need for circumcision, such as when the foreskin is too tight to be pulled back (retracted) over the glans. In other cases, particularly in parts of Africa, circumcision is recommended for older boys or men to reduce the risk of certain sexually transmitted infections.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks. However, the AAP doesn't recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns. The AAP leaves the circumcision decision up to parents — and supports use of anesthetics for infants who have the procedure.
Benefits Vs Risk :
Most healthcare professionals maintain that the potential benefits of circumcision are not strong enough to justify routine childhood circumcision. Critics of circumcision argue that it has disadvantages, such as:
Different types of Circumcision condition :
· PHIMOSIS Phimosis is a condition in which the foreskin can’t be retracted (pulled back) from around the tip of the p
· PARAPHIMOSIS A condition called paraphimosis can also result when the foreskin is retracted, but can’t be moved back into its normal position. This may require emergency medical attention.
· BALANITIS Balanitis is inflammation of the glans p and is a common condition affecting an estimated 3-11% of males. Balanitis can occur in males at any age.
Various Surgery Techniques of male circumcision:
Various methods of circumcision including several devices are in use for male circumcision.
These methods can be grouped into three: Shield and clamp, dorsal slit, and excision.
Many of the methods in use today fall in to one of these major classes. Shield and clamp adopts the use of device to effect circumcision obviating the use of knife in majority of cases. The device method is the commonly used method of circumcision in recent practice.
The device methods appear favored in the pediatric circumcision while the risk of complications increases with increasing age of the patient at surgery.
Benefits of Laser Circumcision
Painless and Bloodless procedure ,No wound no scar left ,10 min procedure, same day discharge.
Conclusion:
As Murphy has argued: “Biomedical research and its social applications are almost always worthy of sustained critical scrutiny” In the case of circumcision, in particular – originally a ritual practice with a long history of being dubiously medicalized – it is important to be especially skeptical . At the end of the day, it is not altogether clear that a minor reduction in the absolute risk of certain infections or diseases – whose prevalence in developed nations is generally low, and whose occurrence can typically be avoided by other, less injurious means8 – is worth the ‘trade-off’ of losing a part of one’s penXs. What is certain, however, is that the answer to this question is likely to be highly subjective, and to depend upon numerous, unpredictable, and ultimately personal factors Therefore, it should be up to the affected individual himself (or indeed herself, in analogous circumstances) to decide about permanent genital-modification surgeries at such a time as he or she can meaningfully factor in his or her own preferences and values. Circumcision before an age of consent is not a desirable health-promotion strategy, given more effective, and less ethically problematic, alternatives.
REFERENCES
1. Blank S, Brady M, Buerk E, Carlo W, Diekema D, Freedman A, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics, Task force on Circumcision: Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e756–85
2. Earp BD, Darby RJ. Does science support infant circumcision? A skeptical reply to Brian Morris. The Skeptic. (2014). Available from: https://www.academia.edu/9872471/Does_science_support_infant_circumcision