Question

What are the differences between a judicial (i.e. court-ordered) affirmative action plan, and a voluntary affirmative action plan? Please give examples for each.

Answer 1

In legal perspective both the plans are voluntary and mandatory according to their own methodology. Judicial affirmative action plan are designed to remove the negative effects so that it can prevent from discrimination. It is based on origin, language, ethics, sex, religion, etc. Judicial affirmation plan is a race relationship policy that did not work until civil right works. Laws, regulation, rules, act, procedure, plans requires for employees to execute the affirmative action plan judicially. Judicially planning is legal work done under the system organized by government. Voluntary action plan can be done by its own that increases the opportunity. It creates a cordial relationship between the execution and implementation. It is tool which is designed in such manner which reduces discrimination, contractor workforce. Voluntary affirmative action plan stated the hierarchy level and better segregation of all levels. Affirmative action programs are complex to create. Affirmative action in getting admission in schools, colleagues, jobs. It can be both judicially and voluntarily. In the recent era, affirmative action disputes are nationwide which took the policy of preferencing admission to those members to who belong to high class/ reserve kotas. This is discrimination among all class of people but globally society is multi cultural. They opt for education, art and cultural activities (dance, extracurricular activities). Many colleagues, schools and workplace have opted affirmative action against discrimination. Even Supreme Court and High Court have upheld these reserved kotas which is judicially pronounced by the Government through various notifications and circulars. This has brought about various alternatives of entrance in every field.