Question

Explain whether, and how, the experience machine thought experiment poses a challenge to hedonism. How do Utilitarians respond to this challenge?

Answer 1

The machine thought experiment was developed and introduced by Robert nozick, so it will ruin the perspective of moral hedonism. The rule factor that issues is human euphoria, and that the essential target must be to broaden joy. In case extravagance is veritable, expressed Nozick, at that factor each individual would quickly select for plug into the revel in machine. Regardless, Nozick calculates a splendid numerous individuals would not do it, and to him, this exhibits there are matters people regard more than their own pleasure, and that joy for enchant leaves us missing something tremendous.

The machine thought, in solicitation to refute moral extravagance. This job communicates that what is moral or right is the thing that brings the self the most pride possible. This psychological test is to a great extent a comparable idea that I contemplated in my introspective philosophy class a prior, yet as an elective we mulled over it the "mind in a tank" break down. It raises the request that if a cerebrum in submerged in some fluid in a holder, and is trapped to cathodes that invigorate experiences and send utilizing powers to the brain, at that factor to what degree are these experiences certifiable? Nozick's investigation as an elective adapt to the subject of what a top notch numerous people need progressively out of their ways of life: pleasurable fake experiences, or credible and genuine presence. Nozick, it very well may be stated, discredits the instance of severa Utilitarians by method for articulating that presence isn't connected to getting the most delight or programming out of something, yet rather about having the decision to as a general rule keep on with one's life and revel in the entire parcel for oneself.

Utilitarianism seems to leave behind a primary bit of life that Nozick appears to jump on. What is moreover as across the board as euphoria is the person, with the motivations and desires that utilitarianism names as suitable in vain. What is sizable is an increasingly significant truth that we can discover and associate with, which utilitarianism in no way, shape or form addresses. What makes human presence what it's far the methods by method for which we live truth be told, with the entire part of the various feelings past just delight. These issues are essential bits of the human experience, basic bits of the significance of ways of life. The intention of presence, and the significance of good quality, are more significant and additional considerations boggling than utilitarianism could propose.

Thanks