What is the purpose, advantages, and disadvantages of each of
the following matrices:
SWOT- Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Threats
:
It is the tool used for audit and analysis of the overall
strategic position of the business in market. The key purpose is to
identify the strategies which creates the company specific business
model that will align the organization resources & capabilities
in a better manner to the needs of environment in which the company
operates.
Advantage:
- versatility: Used to structure strategic planning brainstorming
sessions which facilitates the business alternatives. it is helpful
in assessing vendors, technologies and product markets.
- Builds organization’s strengths
- Reverse its weakness
- factor identification: allows the firm to become familiar with
the their internal and external situations or factors which are
favorable and unfavorable to their goals.
- Wide application: Used across a variety of organizational
requirements. It makes analysis as a staple element in different
business planning in order to include, but not limited to
feasibility studies, product development, analysis of possible
sources of competitive advantage, strategic planning, opportunity
analysis and marketing strategy.
- Simplicity: does not need technical skills or special training
for using this tool. Simplicity makes SWOT as inexpensive.
Disadvantages:
- No weighting factors: The analysis leads to four individual
lists of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, The tool
does not provides the mechanism to rank the significance of one
factor versus another. So it is difficult to determine the amount
of any one factor impact on goals.
- Ambiguity: This tool is a a one dimensional model which divides
each problem attribute as a strength, weakness, opportunity or
threat. However a factor can be both a strength and opportunity or
a strength and a weakness or there is a chance that opportunity can
also be threat. So the tool does not provide the mechanism to deal
with this threats.
- Validity: Analysis considers information available at
particular moment of time & may become updated immediately. So
analysis may lead business decision based on the irrelevant or
unreliable data.
SPACE- Strategic Position and Action
Evaluation:
It is important stage 2 matching tool. It is used to analyze the
organization based on four dimensions two internal
dimensions, namely Financial Strength (FS) and Competitive
Advantage (CA), and two external dimensions, namely Industry
Strength (IS) and Environmental Stability (ES). These four factors
are important for the organization strategic position and helps to
determine the how well the firm is performing in its given
industry.
Advantages:
- Defines the company financial position
- Defines company's competitive position
- Defines company stability position
- Defines company industry position
Disadvantage:
- Inaccurate figures may lead to mismanagement of the
organization.
- Does not capture all the information needed to determine the
firms actual competitive position.
- Entry of new competitor or industry may change the firms
industry position.
- Unanticipated changes in the technology & economy.
BCG- Boston Consulting Group
Advantages:
- It is helpful for the managers to evaluate balance in the
firm's current portfolio of stars, cash cow , question Marks and
dogs.
- It is easy to understand & use. One does not necessary to
have any special skills to understand this concept. The cash cow
and stars are two quadrant of matrix which are ideal for the
company & question marks and dog are the two quadrant which the
firms should try to avoid due to risk involved in the both
scenarios.
- It is applicable for the large firms which seek experience
effect & volume.
- it provides the foundation for the management to decide &
prepare for the future.
- It helps to identify the opportunities for the company ,
because once dog and question marks quadrants are removed the
company is left with cash cows and stars quadrants , Based on the
firms cash position & risk involved the company can go for star
business which has high scope for growth & at the same time
need more investment or company may go for cash cow business Which
provides the good cash inflow with less investment.
- This matrix helps to remove the weak areas of the
business.
Disadvantages:
- link between market share and profitability is not strong
- It neglects the effects of synergies between business
units.
- It is too simplistic approach for complex situations , thus it
will not provide ideal solutions for every situation.
- Sometimes Dogs can earn even more cash as Cash Cows.
- No middle path: There is no middle path which is necessary that
business is high growth or less growth as some business can also be
medium growth , For such business this matrix does not offer any
solution.
IE- Internal/External
This tool is very important when considering the portfolio
management. It is similar to BCG matrix & used in combination
to better analyze internal and external factors of the company. IE
matrix is a continuation of the EFE matrix and IFE matrix
models.
Advantages:
- It tells us company should pursue strategies focused on
increasing market penetration and product development.
- Easy to understand. The input factors are clearly understood
& there will not be any confusion over the terms used for the
matrices, for everyone inside or outside the company.
- Easy to use. It is easy to understand & use. One does not
necessary to have any special skills to understand this
concept
- It focuses on the key internal and external factors. Unlike
some other analyses, the IFE and EFE only highlight the key factors
that are affecting a company or its strategy.
- Multi-purpose. This tools can be used to build ,GE-McKinsey
matrix SWOT analysis, IE matrix or for bench-marking.
Disadvantages:
- Easily replaced. IFE and EFE matrices can be replaced almost
completely by other analysis tools such as SWOT analysis , PEST
analysis, competitive profile matrix etc.
- It will not help directly to strategic formulation. Both
analyses only identify and evaluate the factors but do not help the
company directly in determining the next strategic move or the best
strategy. Other strategy tools have to be used for that.
- Too broad factors. SWOT matrix has the same limitation and it
means that some factors that are not specific enough can be
confused with each other. Some strengths can be weaknesses as
well.
GS- Grand Strategy
Advantages:
- Sets of strategies considered simultaneously or
sequentiallyy
- Integration of pertinent external and internal factors in the
decision making process
Disadvantages:
- Requires intuitive judgments and educated assumptions
- Only as good as the prerequisite inputs
- Only strategies within a given set are evaluated relative to
each other
QSP- Quantitative Strategic Planning
Advantages:
A QSPM provides a framework to prioritize the strategies, it can
be used for comparing strategies at any level such as corporate,
business and functional.The other positive feature of QSPM that it
integrate external and internal factors into decision making
process.A QSPM can be developed for small and large scale profit
and non-profit organizations.
Disadvantages:
A limitation of the QSPM is that it can be only as good as the
prerequisite information and matching analyses upon which it is
based. Another limitation is that it requires good judgment in
assigning attractiveness scores. Also, the sum total attractiveness
scores can be really close such that a final decision is not clear.
Like all analytical tools however, the QSPM should not dictate
decisions but rather should be developed as input into the owner’s
final decision.
The SWOT Matrix, SPACE Matrix, BCG Matrix, IE Matrix, QSP and
Grand Strategy Matrices are similar in that all are matching tools
in stage two of the strategy formulation framework. These
analytical tools differ, in that they focus on different variables.
Also, the BCG and IE Matrices generally apply only to a multi
divisional firm, whereas the TOWS, SPACE, and Grand Strategy
Matrices are applicable to all organizations