Question

In: Accounting

Ifrs 3 Business combinations permits non-controlling interests at the date of acquisition to be values by...

Ifrs 3 Business combinations permits non-controlling interests at the date of acquisition to be values by one of two methods:

(1) at its proportionate share of the subsidiary's identifiable net assets; or

(2) at its fair value (usually determined by the directors of the parent)

Required:

Explain the difference that the accounting treatment of these alternative methods could have on the consolidated financial statements.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Proportionate share of net assets method

The NCI is valued at its proportionate share of fair value of it's net assets at acquisition and subsequently the NCI's share of post acquisition profits is added to it.

Since the NCI is valued at it's proportionate share the goodwill includes parent's share of goodwill only (Partial goodwill method) and any impairment of goodwill needs to be deducted from goodwill by the parent's share of impairment only and the same balance would need to be charged to consolidated retained earnings. The NCI would need no adjustment.

Fair value method

The NCI is valued at fair value at acquisition. Subsequently the NCI's share of post acquisition profits is added to it.

Since the NCI is valued at it's fair value, the goodwill disclosed in the parent company's financial position includes the entire goodwill of the subsidiary (Full goodwill) and any subsequent impairment of goodwill needs to be deducted entirely from the goodwill balance. The parent's share of impairment would need to be charged to retained earnings and the NCI's share of impairment would be deducted from the fair value of NCI.

Understanding the difference between these two methods is very important in learning consolidation. So, please do let me know for any clarifications in the comments below. Please give an upvote if you liked my answer.

Effects of Financial statements:

Statement of financial position:

Goodwill: Goodwill will be higher in the fair value method as the NCI's share of goodwill is also included in it. In the proportionate share method only the parent's share of goodwill is disclosed.
NCI: NCI value will be higher in fair value method by the same amount as goodwill as it also includes NCI's goodwill and not just it's share of fair value of net assets. In proportionate share method NCI does not include it's share of goodwill value.
Impairment: In fair value method subsequent impairment of goodwill will reduce goodwill by a higher amount (But the parent's share only is charged to Income statement, the NCI's share is used to reduce NCI. In proportionate share method only the parent's share is charged to reduce goodwill as NCI's share of goodwill was never recognized in goodwill balance and in NCI balance in the first place.

There is no effect of this method on income statement or cash flow.


Related Solutions

With reference to IFRS, discuss the treatment of non-controlling interests where: 1.2 The parent company pays...
With reference to IFRS, discuss the treatment of non-controlling interests where: 1.2 The parent company pays a premium of acquisition of 90% of the subsidiary due to plant being undervalued in the subsidiary's books. Q2. The subsidiary sells goods at a profit to the parent company which owns 75% of the subsidiary's shares.
Discussing the importance of identifying the acquisition date in AASB 3/ IFRS 3?
Discussing the importance of identifying the acquisition date in AASB 3/ IFRS 3?
In the presence of non-controlling interests, if dividends are declared by a subsidiary and by a...
In the presence of non-controlling interests, if dividends are declared by a subsidiary and by a parent entity, which dividends payable will be shown in the consolidated balance sheet?
How are non-controlling interests affected by intragroup transactions?
How are non-controlling interests affected by intragroup transactions?
Why does AASB 3 provide a choice in how to measure non-controlling interests?
Why does AASB 3 provide a choice in how to measure non-controlling interests?
Topic 3: Consolidation: Non-controlling interests Pepsi Ltd acquired 80% of the shares of Soda Ltd on...
Topic 3: Consolidation: Non-controlling interests Pepsi Ltd acquired 80% of the shares of Soda Ltd on 1 July 2015 for $115 000. At this date the equity of Soda Ltd consisted of: $ Share capital (100,000 shares) 80,000 Retained earnings 29,600 General reserve 2,400 All the identifiable assets and liabilities of Soda Ltd were recorded at amounts equal to their fair values except for: Carrying amount Fair value $ $ Inventories 25,000 28,000 Plant (cost $65,000) 52,000 56,000 Land 40,000...
There are two approaches to measuring non-controlling interests,each of which will lead to a different...
There are two approaches to measuring non-controlling interests, each of which will lead to a different amount being attributed to reported goodwill. Will the choice of either method of accounting for non-controlling interests impact any goodwill impairment expenses that might subsequently be recognised?
Within the equity section of the balance sheet, any non-controlling or minority interests would be best...
Within the equity section of the balance sheet, any non-controlling or minority interests would be best described as: Question 9 options: A.minority shareholders in subsidiaries that have been consolidated. B. minority interests the company has in joint ventures. C. minority shareholders that have significant influence but less than 50 percent control.
Topic : Consolidation: Non-controlling interests On 1 July 2016, Poppy Ltd acquired 80% of the issued...
Topic : Consolidation: Non-controlling interests On 1 July 2016, Poppy Ltd acquired 80% of the issued shares of Sunshine Ltd for $240 000 when the equity of Sunshine Ltd consisted of: share capital $160000 general reserve $10000 retained earnings $59000 At this date, all identifiable assets and liabilities of Sunshine Ltd were recorded at fair value except for the following. carrying amount fair value inventories $ 10000 $14 000 plant (cost $220 000) 90 000 99 000 land 70 000...
The 1990s saw an unprecedented amount of business combinations, also known as mergers and acquisition. Locate...
The 1990s saw an unprecedented amount of business combinations, also known as mergers and acquisition. Locate a company that was involved in a business combination. How is this company performing today? In your opinion, is this company better or worse off after the combination? Explain.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT