IMPACT OF
REGULATORY ACTIVITIES ON THE ETHICS OF THE WORLDCOM
CASE:
- WorldCom was a provider of long distance phone services to
businesses and residents. It started as a small company known as
Long Distance Discount Services (LDDS) that grew tobecome the third
largest telecommunications company in the United States.
- From the outside, WorldCom appeared to be a strong leader of
growth. In reality, the
appearance was nothing more than a perception. On June 25, 2002,
the company revealed that it had been involved in fraudulent
reporting of its numbers by stating a $3 billion profit when in
fact it was a half-a-billion dollar loss.
- The employees at WorldCom did not have an outlet to express
concerns about company
policy and behavior either.The mix of the Board and the close ties
to Ebbers led
to the Board's lack of awareness on WorldCom's issues. The Board
was inactive and met only about four times a year, not enough for a
company growing at the rate that it was.
- The Committee approved the loans to Ebbers without confirming
with the Board and asked for the Board‟s approval after the loans
had already been paid out.
- After the fraud was announced,new measures were taken quickly
to reform WorldCom and restore the public‟s confidence in the
company. The first big step was the removal of top management.
- In WorldCom‟s case, which very closely followed the Enron
debacle, SOX was put into effect. While the government did take
action, most of the regulations listed in SOX were needed to
prevent the WorldCom fraud.If the act was passed before the
WorldCom debacle, the fraud itself may not have occurred.
In general,regulatory activities create a huge impact for
ethical situations.One such example is of consumer protection
regulation in ethical drugs.New laws by FDA required firms to
demonstrate their efficacy as well as safety of all new drugs.If
regulatory activities are properly implemented then good ethics can
be easily implemented and bad one can be removed by stringent
regulations.