In: Math
Kuantan ATV, Inc. assembles five different models of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) from various ready-made components to serve the Las Vegas, Nevada, market. The company uses the same engine for all its ATVs. The purchasing manager, Ms. Jane Kim, needs to choose a supplier for engines for the coming year. Due to the size of the warehouse and other administrative restrictions, she must order the engines in lot sizes of 1,000 each. The unique characteristics of the standardized engine require special tooling to be used during the manufacturing process. Kuantan ATV agrees to reimburse the supplier for the tooling. This is a critical purchase, since late delivery of engines would disrupt production and cause 50 percent lost sales and 50 percent back orders of the ATVs. Jane has obtained quotes from two reliable suppliers but needs to know which supplier is more cost-effective. The terms of sale are 5/10 net 30 for Supplier 1 and 3/10 net 30 for Supplier 2. The data related to the costs of ownership associated with two reliable suppliers has been collected in the Microsoft Excel Online file below. Open the spreadsheet and perform the required analysis to answer the questions below.
Questions
1. What is the total cost of ownership for each of the suppliers? Assume the buyer will take advantage of the largest discount. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest cent.
Supplier 1 | Supplier 2 | |
Total | $ | $ |
2. Which supplier is more cost-effective?
Total Cost of Ownership Analysis | ||||||||
Unit Price | Supplier 1 | Supplier 2 | ||||||
Requirements (annual forecast units) | 14,000 | 1 to 999 units per order | $530.00 | $520.00 | ||||
Lot size (Q) | 1,000 | 1000 to 2999 units per order | $520.00 | $515.00 | ||||
Weight per engine (lbs) | 29 | 3000+ units per order | $510.00 | $506.00 | ||||
Order processing cost (per order) | $125.00 | Tooling cost | $25,000 | $22,000 | ||||
Inventory carrying rate (per year) | 24% | Terms (net 30) | 5% | 3% | ||||
Cost of working capital (per year) | 5% | Distance (miles) | 140 | 100 | ||||
Profit margin | 20% | Supplier Quality Rating (defects) | 3% | 2% | ||||
Price of finished ATV | $5,000 | Supplier Delivery Rating (lateness) | 2% | 3% | ||||
Back-order cost (per unit) | $19.00 | |||||||
Back-order lost sales | 50% | Supplier 1 | Supplier 2 | Formulas | ||||
Late delivery lost sales | 50% | Total engine cost | #N/A | #N/A | ||||
Cash discount (net 30) | #N/A | #N/A | ||||||
Other Information | Cash discount (early payment) | #N/A | #N/A | |||||
Truckload (TL>=40,000 lbs) | $0.60 | per ton-mile | Tooling cost | #N/A | #N/A | |||
Less-than-truckload (LTL) | $1.20 | per ton-mile | Transportation cost | #N/A | #N/A | |||
Per ton-mile | 2,000 | lbs per mile | Ordering cost | #N/A | #N/A | |||
Days per year | 365 | Carrying cost | #N/A | #N/A | ||||
Invoice payment period (days) | 30 | Quality cost | #N/A | #N/A | ||||
Discount period (days) | 10 | Backorder cost | #N/A | #N/A | ||||
Lost sales cost | #N/A | #N/A | ||||||
Total cost | #N/A | #N/A | ||||||
Lowest cost | #N/A |
Order Quantity / Lot size (Q) = 1000 units
Annual Demand (D) = 14,000 units
Weight per engine (e) = 29 lbs
Ordering cost per order (O) = $125
Carrying cost rate (c) = 24%
Cost of working capital (cw) = 5%
Profit margin = 20%
Price of finished ATV = $5,000
Back-order cost = $19
Late Deliveries:
Back order lost sales = 50%
Late Delivery lost sales = 50%
Suppliers 1 Suppliers 2
1 | 530 | 520 |
1000 | 520 | 515 |
3000 | 510 | 506 |
Tooling cost | $25000 | $22000 |
Terms net (30) | 5% | 3% |
Distance (x) | 140 miles | 100 miles |
Supplier defect rating (% of engine cost) (qr) | 3% | 2% |
Supplier delivery rating (dr) | 2% | 3% |
Full Truck Load (FTL) = 40,000 lbs
Truckload (TL >= 40000 lbs): $ per ton-mile = $ 0.60 per ton-mile
Less-than-Truckload (LTL): $ perr ton-mile = $1.20 per ton-mile
(Note: Per ton-mile = pounds per mile) = 2000 lbs per mile
Days per year = 365 days
Invoice payment period (days) = 30
Discount period (days) = 10
Total shipment weight (W) = Q*e = 29000 lbs
Applicable freight rate per 2000 lb per mile (f) = 1.2
Supplier 1 | Supplier 2 | ||
Applicable unit price (p) | 520 | 515 | |
A | Total engine cost = D*P | 7,280,000 | 7,210,000 |
B | Cash discount (net 30) | -(7,280,000*30*0.05)/365 =-29918 | -(7,210,000*30*0.05)/365 =-29630 |
C | Cash discount (early payment) |
-7,280,000(0.05+0.05*10/365) = -373,973 |
-7,210,000(0.03+0.05*10/365) = -226,177 |
D | Tooling cost | $25,000 | $22,000 |
E | Transportation cost = (D*e*X*f)/2000 | (14000*29*140*1.2)/2000 = 34104 | (14000*29*100*1.2)/2000 = 24360 |
F | Ordering cost = (D/Q)*O | 1750 | 1750 |
G | Carrying cost = (Q/2)*p*c | 62,400 | 61800 |
H | Quality Cost = D*p*qr | 218,400 | 144,200 |
I | Back order cost | 14000*19*0.5*0.02 = 2,660 | 14000*19*0.5*0.03 = 3,990 |
J | Lost sales cost | 14000*0.2*5000*0.5*0.02 = 140,000 | 14000*0.2*5000*0.5*0.03 = 210,000 |
Total cost | Sum(A to J) = 7,360,423 | Sum of (A to J) = 7,422,293 |
1)
Supplier 1 = $7,360,423
Suppler 2 = $7,422,293
2)
Total cost of supplier 1 is less cost. So, supplier 1 is recommended.