In: Statistics and Probability
The following time series shows the sales of a particular product over the past 12 months.
Month | Sales |
---|---|
1 | 105 |
2 | 135 |
3 | 120 |
4 | 105 |
5 | 90 |
6 | 120 |
7 | 145 |
8 | 140 |
9 | 100 |
10 | 80 |
11 | 100 |
12 | 110 |
(a)
Construct a time series plot.
(b)
Use α = 0.3 to compute the exponential smoothing forecasts for the time series. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
Month t | Time Series Value
Yt |
Forecast
Ft |
---|---|---|
1 | 105 | |
2 | 135 | |
3 | 120 | |
4 | 105 | |
5 | 90 | |
6 | 120 | |
7 | 145 | |
8 | 140 | |
9 | 100 | |
10 | 80 | |
11 | 100 | |
12 | 110 |
(c)
Use a smoothing constant of α = 0.5 to compute the exponential smoothing forecasts. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
Month t | Time Series Value
Yt |
Forecast
Ft |
---|---|---|
1 | 105 | |
2 | 135 | |
3 | 120 | |
4 | 105 | |
5 | 90 | |
6 | 120 | |
7 | 145 | |
8 | 140 | |
9 | 100 | |
10 | 80 | |
11 | 100 | |
12 | 110 |
Does a smoothing constant of 0.3 or 0.5 appear to provide more accurate forecasts based on MSE?
A smoothing constant of 0.5 is better than a smoothing constant of 0.3 since the MSE is greater for 0.5 than for 0.3.
A smoothing constant of 0.3 is better than a smoothing constant of 0.5 since the MSE is greater for 0.3 than for 0.5.
A smoothing constant of 0.3 is better than a smoothing constant of 0.5 since the MSE is less for 0.3 than for 0.5.
A smoothing constant of 0.5 is better than a smoothing constant of 0.3 since the MSE is less for 0.5 than for 0.3.
solution:
a) Plot the points on the graph.taking months on X-axis and sales on Y- axis.
The time series plot would be:
b) Exponential Smoothing Forecast
F(t+1) = Yt + (1-)Ft
Where F(t+1) is the forecast of timeseries for period t+1
Yt is the actual values of time series in period t
Ft is the forecast of time series for period t
is the smoothing constant [ 0<= <=1]
The following table shows forecast calculations for calculating forecast and MSE
Let = 0.3 and 1- = 0.7
F2 = 0.3*105 + 0.7*105 = 105 F7 = 0.3*120 + 0.7*105.8 = 110.06
F3 = 0.3*135 + 0.7*105 = 114 F8 = 0.3*145 + 0.7*110.06 = 120.54
F4 = 0.3*120 + 0.7*114 = 115.8 F9 = 0.3*140 + 0.7*120.54 = 126.38
F5 = 0.3*105 + 0.7*115.8 = 112.56 F10 = 0.3*100 + 0.7*126.38 = 118.50
F6 = 0.3*90 + 0.7*112.56 = 105.8 F11 = 0.3*80 + 0.7*118.50 = 106.95
F12 = 0.3*100 + 0.7*106.95 = 104.90
Month | Sales (A) | Forecast(N) | Forecast Error(A-N) |
Absolute value of forecast Error |A-N| |
Squared forecast error |A-N|^2 |
1 | 105 | ||||
2 | 135 | 105 | 30 | 30 | 900 |
3 | 120 | 114 | 6 | 6 | 36 |
4 | 105 | 115.8 | -10.8 | 10.8 | 116.64 |
5 | 90 | 112.56 | -22.56 | 22.56 | 508.95 |
6 | 120 | 105.80 | 14.2 | 14.2 | 201.64 |
7 | 145 | 110.06 | 34.94 | 34.94 | 1220.80 |
8 | 140 | 120.54 | 19.46 | 19.46 | 378.69 |
9 | 100 | 126.38 | -26.38 | 26.38 | 695.90 |
10 | 80 | 118.50 | -38.50 | 38.50 | 1482.25 |
11 | 100 | 106.95 | -6.95 | 6.95 | 48.30 |
12 | 110 | 104.90 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 26.01 |
Totals | 4.51 | 214.89 | 5,615.18 |
Therefore, MSE = squared forecast error/ No.of Months forecasted = 5615.18 / 11 =~ 510.47
c)
The following table shows forecast calculations for calculating forecast and MSE
Let = 0.5 and 1- = 0.5
F2 = 0.5*105 + 0.5*105 = 105 F7 = 0.5*120 + 0.5*101.25 = 110.63
F3 = 0.5*135 + 0.5*105 = 120 F8 = 0.5*145 + 0.5*110.63 = 127.82
F4 = 0.5*120 + 0.5*120 = 120 F9 = 0.5*140 + 0.5*127.82 = 133.91
F5 = 0.5*105 + 0.5*120 = 112.5 F10 = 0.5*100 + 0.5*133.91 = 116.95
F6 = 0.5*90 + 0.5*112.5 = 101.25 F11 = 0.5*80 + 0.5*116.95 = 98.48
F12 = 0.5*100 + 0.5*98.48 = 99.24
Month | Sales (A) | Forecast(N) | Forecast Error(A-N) |
Absolute value of forecast Error |A-N| |
Squared forecast error |A-N|^2 |
1 | 105 | ||||
2 | 135 | 105 | 30 | 30 | 900 |
3 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 105 | 120 | -15 | 15 | 225 |
5 | 90 | 112.50 | -22.50 | 22.50 | 506.25 |
6 | 120 | 101.25 | 18.75 | 18.75 | 351.56 |
7 | 145 | 110.63 | 34.37 | 34.37 | 1181.30 |
8 | 140 | 127.82 | 12.18 | 12.18 | 148.35 |
9 | 100 | 133.91 | -33.91 | 33.91 | 1149.90 |
10 | 80 | 116.95 | -36.95 | 36.95 | 1365.30 |
11 | 100 | 98.48 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 2.31 |
12 | 110 | 99.24 | 10.76 | 10.87 | 118.16 |
Totals | -0.78 | 216.83 | 5,948.13 |
Therefore, MSE = squared forecast error/ No.of Months forecasted = 5948.13 / 11 =~ 540.74
c) The Exponential smoothing forecast using = .3 provides a better forecast than The Exponential smoothing forecast using = .5.Since, it has smaller MSE
Option-c is correct: A smoothing constant of 0.3 is better than a smoothing constant of 0.5 since the MSE is less for 0.3 than for 0.5.