In: Finance
(M&A): the existing answers for similar questions below are not clear, please use bullet point and give the overall answers and reasons why to support them, ( From the perspective of target firms or for acquirer firms?)
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the friendly versus hostile approach to a corporate takeover?
What are the primary advantages and disadvantages of commonly used takeover defences (Preoffer / Postoffer Defenses)?
Friendly offer:
Both parties have opportunity to structure deal to their mutual satisfaction:
Hostile offer:
Acquirer’s tactics:
Sl. No. |
Defense Measure |
Mechanism |
1. |
Poison Pill* |
Poison pill gives the shareholders of the target company right to buy target's shares at very attractive (discounted) prices. This increases the cost to potential acquirer. Flip in pill is when target shareholders have right to buy targets shares, flip over is when they have right to buy acquirers shares. |
2. |
Poison put |
Bondholders of the target demand immediate payment of their money in case of an acquisition. This creates strain on acquirer to arrange for the cash |
3. |
State protection |
Certain states have policies which don't favor takeovers |
4. |
Staggered board |
Target can stagger their board, allowing only part of it reelected every year. Hence, acquirer is not able to get control of the board for years. |
5. |
Restricted voting rights |
Voting rights of shareholders holding above a certain percentage of the company are restricted. Hence, it is difficult for the acquirer to submit a tender offer |
6. |
White Knight |
Target company finds a friendlier buyer to merge with |
7. |
Pac man |
Target company attempts to buyout the Hostile Buyer |
8. |
Supermajority voting for mergers |
Provision that mergers can only be approved by a huge percentage of shareholders (as against normal majority in normal cases). Acquirer hence has to get support of those many shareholders to be able to take over the target |
9. |
Nancy Reagan |
BOD decides to reject the offer |
10. |
Fair Price Amendment |
Provision stating that unless a fair price is offered for the target (determined by some provision), the merger can't be done |
11. |
Golden Parachutes |
Provision in which target management gets a hefty severance pay and cash payouts in case of a hostile takeover. This though doesn't deter the acquirer, it serves personal purpose of the management |
12. |
Greenmail |
Some money is offered to the acquirer to withdraw the offer and abandon the plans to take over for a specified period. Although this method was popular earlier, but tax laws were changed in late 1980s taxing such money heavily. Then onwards it has declined in popularity |
13. |
Lobster Traps |
Target firm issues a charter preventing individuals with more than 10% of the convertible securities from converting them to common shares |
14. |
Others |
|