In: Math
6. The following is from the General Social Survey, 2016. Interpret the following frequency distribution and the mode, median, or mean, for the variable CCTV, which asks if the American government should have the right to keep people under video surveillance in public areas. Statistics
Statistics |
||
CCTV Civil liberties - video surveillance |
||
N |
Valid |
1358 |
Missing |
1509 |
|
Mean |
2.26 |
|
Median |
2.00 |
|
Mode |
2 |
|
Std. Deviation |
1.008 |
|
Variance |
1.016 |
|
Range |
3 |
CCTV Civil liberties - video surveillance |
|||||
Frequency |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|||
Valid |
1 Definitely should have the right |
345 |
25.4 |
25.4 |
|
2 Probably should have the right |
534 |
39.3 |
64.7 |
||
3 Probably should not have the right |
264 |
19.4 |
84.2 |
||
4 Definitely should not have the right |
215 |
15.8 |
100.0 |
||
Total |
1358 |
100.0 |
Write an interpretation of the frequency distribution and measure of central tendency you chose
a. This variable is measured by ordinal scale since there are four levels of the variable CCTV :
1. Definitely should have the right (Strongly agree)
2. Probably should have the right (Agree)
3. Probably should not have the right (disagree)
4. Definitely should not have the right (Strongly disagree)
b. Since this is an ordinal variable so we can compute median and mode but best measure of center tendency for this variable is median. Here median= 2.00 i.e. Probably should have the right.
c. Since from the frequency distribution table we see that maximum responses are under Category 2 i.e. maximum no.of American people say that probably American government should have the right to keep people under video surveillance in public areas and lowest number of people vote against CCTV. Even it is also observed that next maximum no. of American people strongly agree for CCTV. Moreover two measures of central tendency i.e. mode, median are same and they are equal to 2 i.e. Probably should have the right. Hence from this discussion it is clear that most of the American people support that the statement "American government should have the right to keep people under video surveillance in public areas".