Post your response to the scenario in which you critically evaluate this footnote. As a reader/reviewer,...

Post your response to the scenario in which you critically evaluate this footnote. As a reader/reviewer, what response would you provide to the authors about this footnote?

Consider the scenario:

A research paper claims a meaningful contribution to the literature based on finding statistically significant relationships between predictor and response variables. In the footnotes, you see the following statement, “given this research was exploratory in nature, traditional levels of significance to reject the null hypotheses were relaxed to the .10 level.

Expert Solution

The footnote: "given this research was exploratory in nature, traditional levels of significance to reject the null hypotheses were relaxed to the .10 level."

Critical evaluation:

An exploratory research is one where the researcher aims at finding out about the research problems and is not aiming at drawing final conclusions from it. It is an exploration of the study since it has not been studied clearly before. A research is exploratory in nature when:

a) it has not been studied before

b) yet to develop it's operational definition

c) would aid in improving the final research design

Therefore, in such a case, the level of significance to reject the null hypotheses could be relaxed to 10% (.10 level) as the researcher is open to the results and has not narrowed down the expectations yet. A 10% relaxation means that there is a 10% chance of finding a difference. The value of the probability being .10 means that there is a higher probability (10%) of the results being a chance result.

Hayet Jeridi answered 1 year ago

Post your response of a minimum of 200 words to the following questions (80 pts): Which...

Post your response of a minimum of 200 words to the following questions (80 pts): Which is your priority–independence or interdependence? Why? How much does your answer relate to your culture?

You will review a case this week. Your post will be a 3 paragraph response, one...

You will review a case this week. Your post will be a 3 paragraph response, one paragraph for each question below (due Wed). Then you will challenge your classmates on their answers - one paragraph each to two classmates (due Thu). A paragraph is a complete thought in five or more sentences. -------------------------------------------------------- In 2001, U.S. airlines spent about 10 percent of their budget on fuel. In 2011, they had to spend 35 percent of their budget on fuel. Airlines,...

Post your response to the following: Briefly describe your project management experience and the project you...

Post your response to the following: Briefly describe your project management experience and the project you have selected to work on for this course. Based on your experience and the unique characteristics of your project: Analyze the relevance of critical chain project management. Is this an approach that would be helpful in assisting successfully managing your project? Explain your rationale and support that rationale with a minimum of one citation to the weekly resources Analyze the relevance of the flexibility...

Critically evaluate alternative sources of debt and equity finance for a company. Within your evaluation you...

Critically evaluate alternative sources of debt and equity finance for a company. Within your evaluation you are also required to propose criteria the company might use when considering which financing method(s) to use. (700 words)

Post a response on the discussion board. If appropriate, include personal experience in your response. Inventory...

Post a response on the discussion board. If appropriate, include personal experience in your response. Inventory accounting is a good place for fraudulent behavior. Think about the accounting principles and practices related to inventory and list one way that fraudulent behavior might take place. Be very specific. Create one way to reduce the risk of this fraudulent behavior in the business.

300 words response Respond to the following hypothetical scenario. Your doctor informs you that your brain...

300 words response Respond to the following hypothetical scenario. Your doctor informs you that your brain has grown too large for your skull. You will survive, as long as they operate right away. The doctor states that s/he must take out one part of the brain to make space. You must decide which part of the brain you could best live without. Which brain part would you give up and why?

Describe the impacts and your response to the following scenarios. Scenario Impact Response A client trips...

Describe the impacts and your response to the following scenarios. Scenario Impact Response A client trips over a rug and falls to the floor hurting his arm and face One of the clients goes missing on your shift. A client is seen hitting another client over the head violently

Based on your reading and analysis of the case study, post your response to the following:...

Based on your reading and analysis of the case study, post your response to the following: What challenges does Brown, the CIO, face in creating a process-oriented organization? What are the requirements for creating a process-oriented culture in an organization? To what extend does Pinnacle West address these requirements? Where is it lacking? Is it necessary to push the process-oriented culture to the entire company, or is having a process-oriented information technology organization sufficient for driving value from business information...

Stress and Conflict Management Discussion For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to...

Stress and Conflict Management Discussion For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates. Participate in the discussions (which are your peer responses) by providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or by...

Critically evaluate the process of performance management of your job (Job is Assistant Lecturer). Your answer...

Critically evaluate the process of performance management of your job (Job is Assistant Lecturer). Your answer should include the following elements: (i) Importance of your job to the organizational mission achievement (Why the job exists). (ii) Explain the process of performance planning, KPIs, Standards setting and monitoring the jobs at your organization in general and in particular your job. (iii) Explain the way the performance appraisal of yours has been conducted, (iv) What kind of purposes the appraisal information is...

Question