In: Math
Changes in Education Attainment: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the distribution of Highest Education Attainment in U.S. adults aged 25 - 34 in the year 2005 is given in the table below.
Census: Highest Education Attainment - 2005
No | High School | Associate's | Bachelor's | Graduate or | |
Diploma | Diploma | Degree | Degree | Professional Degree | |
Percent | 14% | 48% | 8% | 22% | 8% |
In a survey of 4000 adults aged 25 - 34 in the year 2013, the
counts for these levels of educational attainment are given in the
table below.
Survey (n = 4000): Highest Education Attainment - 2013
No | High School | Associate's | Bachelor's | Graduate or | |
Diploma | Diploma | Degree | Degree | Professional Degree | |
Count | 485 | 1922 | 336 | 876 | 381 |
The Test: Test whether or not the distribution of
education attainment has changed from 2005 to 2013. Conduct this
test at the 0.01 significance level.(a) What is the null hypothesis
for this test?
H0: p1 = p2 = p3 = p4 = p5 = 1/5 H0: The probabilities are not all equal to 1/5. H0: p1 = 0.14, p2 = 0.48, p3 = 0.08, p4 = 0.22, and p5 = 0.08. H0: The distribution in 2013 is different from that in 2005.
(b) The table below is used to calculate the test statistic.
Complete the missing cells.
Round your answers to the same number of decimal places as
other entries for that column.
Highest | Observed | Assumed | Expected | ||||
i | Education | Frequency (Oi) | Probability (pi) | Frequency Ei |
|
||
1 | No Diploma | 485 | 0.14 | 560 | 2 | ||
2 | Diploma | 1922 | 0.48 | 3 | 0.002 | ||
3 | Associate's | 336 | 4 | 320 | 0.800 | ||
4 | Bachelor's | 5 | 0.22 | 880 | 0.018 | ||
5 | Grad or Prof | 381 | 0.08 | 320 | 11.628 | ||
Σ | n = 4000 | χ2 = 6 | |||||
(c) What is the value for the degrees of freedom? 7
(d) What is the critical value of
χ2
? Use the answer found in the
χ2
-table or round to 3 decimal places.
tα = 8
(e) What is the conclusion regarding the null hypothesis?
reject H0 fail to reject H0
(f) Choose the appropriate concluding statement.
We have proven that the distribution of 2013 education attainment levels is the same as the distribution in 2005. The data suggests that the distribution of 2013 education attainment levels is different from the distribution in 2005. There is not enough data to suggest that the distribution of 2013 education attainment levels is different from the distribution in 2005.
a) Null and Alternative hypothesis:
H0: p1 = 0.14, p2 = 0.48, p3 = 0.08, p4 = 0.22, and p5 = 0.08.
Category | Observed Frequency (O) | Proportion, p | Expected Frequency (E) | (O-E)²/E |
No diploma | 485 | 0.14 | 4000 * 0.14 = 560 | (485 - 560)²/560 = 10.0446 |
High school diploma | 1922 | 0.48 | 4000 * 0.48 = 1920 | (1922 - 1920)²/1920 = 0.0021 |
Associate's Degree | 336 | 0.08 | 4000 * 0.08 = 320 | (336 - 320)²/320 = 0.8 |
Bachelor's Degree | 876 | 0.22 | 4000 * 0.22 = 880 | (876 - 880)²/880 = 0.0182 |
Graduate Degree | 381 | 0.08 | 4000 * 0.08 = 320 | (381 - 320)²/320 = 11.6281 |
Total | 4000 | 1 | 4000 | χ² = 22.4930 |
c) Degree of freedom, df = n-1 = 4
d) Critical value:
χ²α = CHISQ.INV.RT(0.01, 4) = 13.277
e) As χ² = 22.493 > 13.277, so we reject the null hypothesis.
f) Conclusion:
The data suggests that the distribution of 2013 education attainment levels is different from the distribution in 2005.