3. Consider a pure exchange economy with two goods, wine (x)
and cheese (y) and two con- sumers, A and B. Let cheese be the
numeraire good with price of $1. Consumer A’s utility function is
UA(x,y) = xy and B’s utility function is UB(x,y) = min[x,y]. A has
an initial allocation of 10 x and no y, and B has an initial
allocation of 10 units of y and no x.
(a) Put wine x on the horizontal axis and cheese y on the
vertical axis. Measure goods for consumer A from the lower left and
goods for consumer B from the upper right. Solve for the contract
curve of Pareto efficient allocations in this economy and show this
on your graph.
(b) Mark the initial allocation with the letter W. Draw the
indifference curves for each person through this point. Calculate
utility at this allocation for both consumers. Is the initial
resource allocation consistent with Pareto efficiency?
Explain.
(c) Find the competitive equilibrium prices and consumption
for each type of consumer. Derive A’s and B’s demand functions
(Marshallian). Calculate the equilibrium price of wine assuming
price of cheese is $1. Using demand for wine, show that Walras’ Law
holds. Show the budget constraint and indifference curves at the
equilibrium. Label the equilibrium E. Show that E is on the
contract curve.
(d) Suppose instead, you wished to obtain the equilibrium E1,
where utility of A is equal to UB = 7. Find corresponding price of
wine p1 that must hold in this instance, and show the set of
possible new endowments (which will be a line) that satisfies the
Second Theorem of Welfare Economics, given p1.