Question

In: Operations Management

What types of employer conduct with respect to unions does the law prohibit? Do you agree...

What types of employer conduct with respect to unions does the law prohibit? Do you agree with these prohibitions?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Employer/Union Rights and Obligations

The National Labor Relations Act forbids employers from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of rights relating to organizing, forming, joining or assisting a labor organization for collective bargaining purposes, or from working together to improve terms and conditions of employment, or refraining from any such activity. Similarly, labor organizations may not restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of these rights.

Examples of employer conduct that violates the law:

  • Threatening employees with loss of jobs or benefits if they join or vote for a union or engage in protected concerted activity.
  • Threatening to close the plant if employees select a union to represent them.
  • Questioning employees about their union sympathies or activities in circumstances that tend to interfere with, restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of their rights under the Act.
  • Promising benefits to employees to discourage their union support.
  • Transferring, laying off, terminating, assigning employees more difficult work tasks, or otherwise punishing employees because they engaged in union or protected concerted activity.
  • Transferring, laying off, terminating, assigning employees more difficult work tasks, or otherwise punishing employees because they filed unfair labor practice charges or participated in an investigation conducted by NLRB.

Examples of labor organization conduct that violates the law:

  • Threats to employees that they will lose their jobs unless they support the union.
  • Seeking the suspension, discharge or other punishment of an employee for not being a union member even if the employee has paid or offered to pay a lawful initiation fee and periodic fees thereafter.
  • Refusing to process a grievance because an employee has criticized union officials or because an employee is not a member of the union in states where union security clauses are not permitted.
  • Fining employees who have validly resigned from the union for engaging in protected concerted activities following their resignation or for crossing an unlawful picket line.
  • Engaging in picket line misconduct, such as threatening, assaulting, or barring non-strikers from the employer's premises.
  • Striking over issues unrelated to employment terms and conditions or coercively enmeshing neutrals into a labor dispute.

What rules govern collective bargaining for a contract?

After employees choose a union as a bargaining representative, the employer and union are required to meet at reasonable times to bargain in good faith about wages, hours, vacation time, insurance, safety practices and other mandatory subjects. Some managerial decisions such as subcontracting, relocation, and other operational changes may not be mandatory subjects of bargaining, but the employer must bargain about the decision's effects on unit employees.

It is an unfair labor practice for either party to refuse to bargain collectively with the other, but parties are not compelled to reach agreement or make concessions.

If after sufficient good faith efforts, no agreement can be reached, the employer may declare impasse, and then implement the last offer presented to the union. However, the union may disagree that true impasse has been reached and file a charge of an unfair labor practice for failure to bargain in good faith. The NLRB will determine whether true impasse was reached based on the history of negotiations and the understandings of both parties.

If the Agency finds that impasse was not reached, the employer will be asked to return to the bargaining table. In an extreme case, the NLRB may seek a federal court order to force the employer to bargain.

The parties' obligations do not end when the contract expires. They must bargain in good faith for a successor contract, or for the termination of the agreement, while terms of the expired contract continue.

A party wishing to end the contract must notify the other party in writing 60 days before the expiration date, or 60 days before the proposed termination. The party must offer to meet and confer with the other party and notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service(link is external) of the existence of a dispute if no agreement has been reached by that time.

How is "good faith" bargaining determined?

There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of NLRB cases dealing with the issue of the duty to bargain in good faith. In determining whether a party is bargaining in good faith, the Board will look at the totality of the circumstances. The duty to bargain in good faith is an obligation to participate actively in the deliberations so as to indicate a present intention to find a basis for agreement. This implies both an open mind and a sincere desire to reach an agreement as well as a sincere effort to reach a common ground.

The additional requirement to bargain in "good faith" was incorporated to ensure that a party did not come to the bargaining table and simply go through the motions. There are objective criteria that the NLRB will review to determine if the parties are honoring their obligation to bargain in good faith, such as whether the party is willing to meet at reasonable times and intervals and whether the party is represented by someone who has the authority to make decisions at the table.

Conduct away from the bargaining table may also be relevant. For instance if an Employer were to make a unilateral change in the terms and conditions of employees employment without bargaining, that would be an indication of bad faith.

What are the rules about union dues?

The amount of dues collected from employees represented by unions is subject to federal and state laws and court rulings.

The NLRA allows employers and unions to enter into union-security agreements, which require all employees in a bargaining unit to become union members and begin paying union dues and fees within 30 days of being hired.

Even under a security agreement, employees who object to full union membership may continue as 'core' members and pay only that share of dues used directly for representation, such as collective bargaining and contract administration. Known as objectors, they are no longer full members but are still protected by the union contract. Unions are obligated to tell all covered employees about this option, which was created by a Supreme Court ruling and is known as the Beck right.

An employee may object to union membership on religious grounds, but in that case, must pay an amount equal to dues to a nonreligious charitable organization.

What about Right to Work states?

27 states have banned union-security agreements by passing so-called "right to work" laws. In these states, it is up to each employee at a workplace to decide whether or not to join the union and pay dues, even though all workers are protected by the collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the union.

Labor and employment law is a type of law intended to control and mediate the relationships between employees, employers, labor unions and the government. Under labor law, there are a few separate categories:

  • Collective labor law which concerns employees, employers and labor unions
  • Individual labor law which concerns the rights of the employees

The history of labor law is fairly recent. Labor law first emerged during the Industrial Revolution as a result of the changing nature of production from small-scale to large-scale. This shift allowed employers to hire many more employees, however, the growth of production allowed for exploitation of workers. Enter, labor law. Employees wished to have better working conditions. Another issue that labor law was created to protect was child labor. As the Revolution progressed, laws were passed to limit the age group of children who could work, then eventually, eliminate child labor all together.

As previously mentioned, collective labor law mediates the relationship between employees, employers and labor unions. Terms of collective labor law are:

  • Labor unions: collective labor law controls the participation or lack of participation of employees in a labor union or trade union. Some trades require that all workers be a member of the respective trade union, while some do not make participation mandatory.
  • Workplace participation: a right that binds workers to participate in workplace management, such as elect the board of directors.
  • Information and consultation: requires that employers inform employees of issues within the company
  • Collective action: this describes the procedures required to legally start and participate a strike on the part of the employees

Individual labor law, as mentioned, concerns the rights of the employees as individuals. The terms of individual labor law include:

  • Employment terms: the terms of employment under which the employee is hired, as legally confirmed by a contract.
  • Minimum wage: this term defines the minimum amount of pay the worker can receive per hour of work.
  • Living wage: this is designed to protect workers who are hired under full-time conditions and need to support a family
  • Hours: the amount of hours a worker can work a day is defined in this section. This also ensures that workers who do go overtime receive suitable compensation.
  • Health and safety
  • Discrimination: concerning the presence of racial and gender discrimination
  • Dismissal: this term defines the conditions under which an employee can fired and the compensation they receive as a result of this.

Many governments have specific and defined labor laws to protect the rights of all workers in their respective country. For example, in the United States, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, with an amendment in 1950, sets standards that require an employee to work a maximum of 40 hours a week. This law applies to all citizens of the United States who are employed.

As per my view, I totally agree with the law made for the rights of labour and union regarding the employer conduct. An employer can no way stop an employee for joining a union or can no way take away their rights but it is the responsibility of an employee also to practice the rights in a healthy way and not to misuse thei rights or not to take any unnecessary advantage of the same. The rights are meant for safe guarding the rights of labour and to save them from employer exploitation and not for any trouble to the employers.


Related Solutions

2. "Unions do not happen, they are caused by management." Do you agree or disagree with...
2. "Unions do not happen, they are caused by management." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?
what do you think the current state of (or perception of) the law is with respect...
what do you think the current state of (or perception of) the law is with respect to our society?  Are lawyers and lawsuits bad for a prosperous economy? Do they have a function to help the economy? What do you think is the biggest influence on your personal perceptions of the law? The media? Internet postings blogs? Discussions with friends, relatives, coworkers? Opinions offered by Politicians or your employer?  
Does your employer offer an accountable or non-accountable plans for employee business expenses? Do you agree...
Does your employer offer an accountable or non-accountable plans for employee business expenses? Do you agree with the method? Provide support four your rationale.   If you are unsure of the type of plan your company has, would you suggest an accountable or non-accountable plan. Provide support for your rationale.
The law of demand is the first and primary law of economics. Do you agree? Explain...
The law of demand is the first and primary law of economics. Do you agree? Explain the law of demand with the help of a clearly labelled diagram.              [Answer in 150 – 200 words] [Draw in paper; take photo and paste/Use MS Word/add screenshot] Though, the law of demand is the primary law of economics, it is subject to certain limitations in the form of exceptions. Discuss any five such exceptions to law of demand with valid examples. [Answer in...
15.3     What does the Wagner Act prohibit?
15.3     What does the Wagner Act prohibit?
Do you agree the employer usually has the upper hand when it comes to establishing the...
Do you agree the employer usually has the upper hand when it comes to establishing the employment relationship? Why might the employee have maximum power over the employer?
Based on your experiences, do you agree that there is a “law of karma” that explains...
Based on your experiences, do you agree that there is a “law of karma” that explains the course your life takes? In addition, after reading the materials on “Why do bad things happen to good people?” what are some of the key points made regarding suffering? Also, speculate how a monotheist might explain why bad things happen to good people.
What do you agree in this? What challenges does this pose for democracy? I may be...
What do you agree in this? What challenges does this pose for democracy? I may be going on a limb here, but DEMOCRACY itself is at stake. If we were to allow the e-votes to be easily changed, discarded, or altered, it could change the landscape of an entire nation. Peoples votes would essentially not matter in a prime election where you elect the least qualified individual to a position of great importance. The damage they can do, not because...
What are the pros and cons of unions? How do you see unions and labor rights...
What are the pros and cons of unions? How do you see unions and labor rights fitting in to social justice? Google & read a bit about César Chávez and Dolores Huerta. How do you see social justice in their farm worker union struggle? Hint: are farm workers in California a particularly vulnerable group of people?
Does anybody belong to a union? What are your thoughts/perceptions about unions? Do you believe that...
Does anybody belong to a union? What are your thoughts/perceptions about unions? Do you believe that unions are necessary and ethical in the marketplace? Explain why or why not.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT