In: Statistics and Probability
In an experiment to determine the effects of conventional and reduced tillage agriculture on crop yield for oats, 3 varieties of oats and two levels of fertilization (0.5 and 1 kg/ acre) were examined using conventional and reduce tillage techniques. Twenty 20 x 60m plots were each partitioned into 6 -10 x 20m subplots and subplots assigned at random to receive a combination of oat variety and fertilizer treatment. Ten of these plots were subjected to conventional tillage practices and 10 were subjected to reduced tillage practices. Each subplot was harvested at seasons' end and crop yield is expressed in bushels/acre. Examine the data provided in the data file oats.csv. Report hypothesis tests for all possible effects.
Data provided in the data file oats.csv. :
tr | fert1v1 | fert1v2 | fert1v3 | fert2v1 | fert2v2 | fert2v3 | |
1 | 1 | 55.59555 | 62.28367 | 54.02856 | 52.3082 | 66.11916 | 47.28625 |
2 | 1 | 54.83042 | 66.4528 | 58.34965 | 51.20269 | 70.35817 | 59.59235 |
3 | 1 | 47.17417 | 53.11721 | 48.0996 | 42.20308 | 56.72854 | 49.01972 |
4 | 1 | 49.92158 | 59.02375 | 51.37804 | 47.1327 | 63.70916 | 51.65932 |
5 | 1 | 63.2877 | 69.37552 | 67.33111 | 60.75426 | 76.44359 | 64.48788 |
6 | 1 | 43.26808 | 51.84271 | 43.80456 | 43.46588 | 58.33783 | 41.24954 |
7 | 1 | 53.43448 | 61.23901 | 56.50824 | 55.53189 | 66.73144 | 54.54501 |
8 | 1 | 52.09698 | 59.69132 | 56.43002 | 46.99428 | 67.06747 | 57.05954 |
9 | 1 | 53.23395 | 59.83314 | 57.81001 | 54.74937 | 64.69777 | 57.40591 |
10 | 1 | 43.52501 | 48.36869 | 43.50235 | 40.54583 | 53.5147 | 45.39921 |
11 | 2 | 49.76705 | 52.92597 | 51.92696 | 48.5611 | 58.35346 | 48.73186 |
12 | 2 | 57.11089 | 60.52846 | 55.08849 | 52.75431 | 63.08562 | 58.9274 |
13 | 2 | 57.08448 | 69.46167 | 59.38628 | 59.41141 | 77.39677 | 59.74098 |
14 | 2 | 55.65932 | 64.41633 | 55.02598 | 55.76469 | 72.4667 | 56.30465 |
15 | 2 | 67.73778 | 72.19191 | 67.87371 | 67.11457 | 77.51533 | 64.34463 |
16 | 2 | 63.81949 | 66.31592 | 59.74957 | 63.24728 | 70.01633 | 61.11576 |
17 | 2 | 59.57243 | 63.58954 | 59.51328 | 60.33233 | 68.53625 | 59.57449 |
18 | 2 | 53.61506 | 60.7735 | 56.80479 | 47.1538 | 64.1669 | 59.46785 |
19 | 2 | 61.84216 | 67.61936 | 64.58683 | 57.77677 | 75.37341 | 63.0163 |
20 | 2 | 60.88292 | 67.25251 | 60.19583 | 58.40519 | 72.17987 | 57.51454 |
Let CT be the Conventional Tillage and RT be the Reduced Tillage.
Now a thorough examination of the yield data of Oat given above gives the following insights:
Tillage Practice | Max of fert1v1 | Max of fert1v2 | Max of fert1v3 | Max of fert2v1 | Max of fert2v2 | Max of fert2v3 | Max Yield | Mean Yield |
CT | 63.2877 | 69.37552 | 67.33111 | 60.75426 | 76.44359 | 64.48788 | 76.44359 | 66.94668 |
RT | 67.73778 | 72.19191 | 67.87371 | 67.11457 | 77.51533 | 64.34463 | 77.51533 | 69.46299 |
It can be inferred from the above findings that there is no significant difference between CT and RT practices as the average yield per acre are almost same, 67 and 69 bushels per acre. The difference may be attributed to treatment effect or inherent fertility variation.
Let's formulate the relevant hypotheses to test and validate the above inference at say, 5% level of significance.
H0: CT = RT, CT_fert1v1 = RT_fert1v1, CT_fert1v2 = RT_fert1v2, CT_fert1v3 = RT_fert1v3, CT_fert2v1 = RT_fert2v1, CT_fert2v2 = RT_fert2v2, CT_fert2v3 = RT_fert2v3, CT_fert1v1 = CT_fert1v2 = CT_fert1v3 = CT_fert2v1 = CT_fert2v2 = CT_fert2v3, RT_fert1v1 = RT_fert1v2 = RT_fert1v3 = RT_fert2v1 = RT_fert2v2 = RT_fert2v3
Against,
H1: CT < RT