In: Accounting
Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrial component parts—the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown:
|
Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement |
|||
| Sales | $ | 1,704,000 | |
| Cost of goods sold | 1,232,390 | ||
| Gross margin | 471,610 | ||
| Selling and administrative expenses | 610,000 | ||
| Net operating loss | $ | (138,390 | ) |
Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,000 units of B300 at a price of $20 per unit and 12,600 units of T500 at a price of $40 per unit. The company’s traditional cost system allocates manufacturing overhead to products using a plantwide overhead rate and direct labor dollars as the allocation base. Additional information relating to the company’s two product lines is shown below:
| B300 | T500 | Total | ||||
| Direct materials | $ | 400,200 | $ | 162,000 | $ | 562,200 |
| Direct labor | $ | 120,900 | $ | 42,900 | 163,800 | |
| Manufacturing overhead | 506,390 | |||||
| Cost of goods sold | $ | 1,232,390 | ||||
The company has created an activity-based costing system to evaluate the profitability of its products. Hi-Tek’s ABC implementation team concluded that $53,000 and $102,000 of the company’s advertising expenses could be directly traced to B300 and T500, respectively. The remainder of the selling and administrative expenses was organization-sustaining in nature. The ABC team also distributed the company’s manufacturing overhead to four activities as shown below:
| Manufacturing Overhead |
Activity | |||||
| Activity Cost Pool (and Activity Measure) | B300 | T500 | Total | |||
| Machining (machine-hours) | $ | 209,610 | 90,900 | 62,100 | 153,000 | |
| Setups (setup hours) | 136,080 | 74 | 250 | 324 | ||
| Product-sustaining (number of products) | 100,600 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Other (organization-sustaining costs) | 60,100 | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Total manufacturing overhead cost | $ | 506,390 | ||||
Required:
1. Compute the product margins for the B300 and T500 under the company’s traditional costing system.
2. Compute the product margins for B300 and T500 under the activity-based costing system.
3. Prepare a quantitative comparison of the traditional and activity-based cost assignments.
| 1. | Compute the product margins for the B300 and T500 under the company's traditional | ||||||||
| costing system. | |||||||||
| Plantwide overhead rate = | Estimated total mfg. cost / Estimated total DL $ | ||||||||
| PMOH Rate = | $5,06,390 | / | $1,63,800 | $3 | per DLS | ||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Sales | $12,00,000 | $5,04,000 | $17,04,000 | ||||||
| Direct materials | $4,00,200 | $1,62,000 | $5,62,200 | ||||||
| Direct labor | 1,20,900 | 42,900 | 1,63,800 | ||||||
| Manufacturing overhead applied | 3,73,764 | 1,32,626 | 5,06,390 | ||||||
| Total manufacturing costs | $8,94,864 | $3,37,526 | $12,32,390 | ||||||
| Product margin (Traditional) | $3,05,136 | $1,66,474 | $4,71,610 | ||||||
| Note: All of the mfg. overhead costs is applied to each product based on direct labor dollars | |||||||||
| 2. | Compute the product margins for the B300 and T500 under the activity-based costing | ||||||||
| system. | |||||||||
| Cost | 1st Stage | Cost | |||||||
| Pool | Pool | Activity Driver Usage | Pool | ||||||
| Activity Cost Pool | Driver | Allocations | B300 | T500 | Total | Rates | |||
| Machining | MHr. | $2,09,610 | 90,900 | 62,100 | 1,53,000 | $1.370 | |||
| Setups | Setup Hrs. | 1,36,080 | 74 | 250 | 324 | $420 | |||
| Product Sustaining | # of Products | 1,00,600 | 1 | 1 | 2 | $50,300 | |||
| Organizational Sustaining | NA | 60,100 | NA | NA | NA | ||||
| Total Mfg. Overhead | $5,06,390 | ||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Sales | $12,06,000 | $5,00,000 | $17,06,000 | ||||||
| Direct materials | $4,00,200 | $1,62,000 | $5,62,200 | ||||||
| Direct labor | 1,20,900 | 42,900 | 1,63,800 | ||||||
| Advertising expense | 53,000 | 1,02,000 | 1,55,000 | ||||||
| Mfg. Overhead assigned | |||||||||
| Machining pool | 1,24,533 | 85,077 | 2,09,610 | ||||||
| Setup pool | 31,080 | 1,05,000 | 1,36,080 | ||||||
| Product sustaining | 50,300 | 50,300 | 1,00,600 | ||||||
| Total costs assigned | $7,80,013 | $5,47,277 | $13,27,290 | ||||||
| Product margin (ABC) | $4,25,987 | ($47,277) | $3,78,710 | ||||||
| 3. | Prepare a quantitative comparison of the traditional and activity-based cost assignments. | ||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Amount | % of | Amount | % of | ||||||
| Direct materials | $4,00,200 | 71.2% | $1,62,000 | 28.8% | $5,62,200 | ||||
| Direct labor | $1,20,900 | 73.8% | $42,900 | 26.2% | $1,63,800 | ||||
| Manufacturing overhead applied | $3,73,764 | 73.8% | $1,32,626 | 26.2% | $5,06,390 | ||||
| Total manufacturing costs | $8,94,864 | $3,37,526 | $12,32,390 | ||||||
| Selling & administrative | 6,10,000 | ||||||||
| Total Costs | $18,42,390 | ||||||||
| Note: Total costs accounted for | $18,42,390 | ||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Amount | % of | Amount | % of | ||||||
| Direct materials | $4,00,200 | 71.2% | $1,62,000 | 28.8% | $5,62,200 | ||||
| Direct labor | $1,20,900 | 73.8% | $42,900 | 26.2% | $1,63,800 | ||||
| Advertising expense | $53,000 | 34.2% | $1,02,000 | 65.8% | $1,55,000 | ||||
| Mfg. Overhead assigned | |||||||||
| Machining pool | $1,24,533 | 59.4% | $85,077 | 40.6% | $2,09,610 | ||||
| Setup pool | $31,080 | 22.8% | $1,05,000 | 77.2% | $1,36,080 | ||||
| Product sustaining | $50,300 | 50.0% | $50,300 | 50.0% | $1,00,600 | ||||
| Total costs assigned | $7,80,013 | $5,47,277 | $13,27,290 | ||||||
| Selling & Administrative (Indirect) | 4,55,000 | ||||||||
| Organizational Sustaining Costs | 60,100 | ||||||||
| Total Costs | $18,42,390 | ||||||||
| Explain why the traditional and activity-based cost assignments differ. | |||||||||
| First: | The traditional costing system assigns all $506,390 of mfg. overhead to the products. | ||||||||
| The ABC costing system does not assign organizational-sustaining costs to products. | |||||||||
| Second: | The traditional costing system uses one unit-level allocation base, direct labor dollars, | ||||||||
| to assign. | |||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Consumption ratio: | 73.8% | 26.2% | 100% | ||||||
| The ABC costing system uses three different pool drivers. | |||||||||
| 1. Machine hours (unit-level driver) | |||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Consumption ratio: | 59.4% | 40.6% | 100% | ||||||
| 2. Setup hours (batch-level driver) | |||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Consumption ratio: | 22.8% | 77.2% | 100% | ||||||
| 3. Products (product-level driver) | |||||||||
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||||
| Consumption ratio: | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100% | ||||||
| Third: | The traditional system does not trace any non-manufacturing direct costs to the products. | ||||||||
| The ABC costing system traces direct advertising costs to the products. | |||||||||