Question

In: Economics

Your company has two alternatives to consider for purchasing new heat treating ovens for hardening and...

Your company has two alternatives to consider for purchasing new heat treating ovens for hardening and annealing production metal assemblies. Details of each alternative are given below. Draw the cash flow diagram for each and assume your company’s MARR is 8%. Using a present value comparison which alternative do you recommend?

Alternative A: The TomKin Oven Company will sell your company 5 heat treating ovens with manual feeds and extraction mechanisms. The ovens will initially cost $18,000 each and have an estimated life of 7 years. They will all require insulation overhauls in year 4 costing $2,500 each. At the end of their life each oven is estimated to be worth $2,000. The ovens will result in tougher metal assemblies which is estimated to save the company $57,000 per year total in year 1 increasing by $3,500 per year total every year after year 1.

Alternative B: The Quickspeed Heat Treat Equipment Company will also sell your company 5 heat treating ovens but with automatic feeds and extraction mechanisms. The ovens will initially cost $25,000 each and have an estimated life of 7 years. They will not require any insulation overhauls but are each expected to have maintenance issues costing $700 each in year 1 and then increasing by $400 each for every year after year 1. At the end of their life, each oven is estimated to be worth $3,000. The ovens will result in tougher metal assemblies which is estimated to save the company $70,000 per year total in year 1 increasing by $4,100 per year total every year after year 1.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Alternative A

No. of Ovens= 5

Initial Cost =$18000

Total Initial Cost = 18000*5=$90000

Life 7 years

Overhaul cost in year 4 = $2500*5 = $12500

Salvage value = $2000*5 =$10000

Saving in Year 1 = $57000

Saving in Year 2 = 57000+3500 = 60500

Saving in Year 3 = 60500+3500 = 64000

Saving in Year 4 = 64000+3500 = 67500

Saving in Year 5 = 67500+3500 = 71000

Saving in Year 6 = 71000+3500 = 74500

Saving in Year 7 = 74500+3500 = 78000

Cashflow can be calculated as follows:

YR0 YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7
Initial Cost -90000
Overhaul Cost -12500
Salvage Value 10000
Savings 57000 60500 64000 67500 71000 74500 78000
Total Cashflow -90000 57000 60500 64000 -12500+67500 71000 74500 10000+78000
Total Cashflow -90000 57000 60500 64000 55000 71000 74500 88000

Total Present Value can be calculated as follows:

YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7
Total Cashflow -90000 57000 60500 64000 55000 71000 74500 88000
Present Value -90000 =57000/(1+8%)^1 =60500/(1+8%)^2 =64000/(1+8%)^3 =55000/(1+8%)^4 =71000/(1+8%)^5 =74500/(1+8%)^6 =88000/(1+8%)^7
Present Value -90000 =57000/1.08 =60500/1.08^2 =64000/1.08^3 =55000/1.08^4 =71000/1.08^5 =74500/1.08^6 =88000/1.08^7
Present Value -90000 =57000/1.08 =60500/1.1664 =64000/1.260 =55000/1.3605 =71000/1.4693 =74500/1.5869 =88000/1.7138
Present Value -90000 52777.78 51869.00 50805.26 40426.64 48321.41 46947.64 51347.15
Total Present Value =-90000+52777.78+51869+50805.26+40426.64+48321.41+46947.64+51347.15
Total Present Value 252494.9

Alternative B

No. of Ovens= 5

Initial Cost =$25000

Total Initial Cost = 25000*5=$125000

Life 7 years

Maintenance cost in each year = $700*5 = $3500 with increase of 400*5=$2000 every year

Maintenance cost in Year 2 = 3500+2000= 5500

Maintenance cost in Year 3 = 5500+2000 = 7500

Maintenance cost in Year 4 = 7500+2000 = 9500

Maintenance cost in Year 5 = 9500+2000 = 11500

Maintenance cost in Year 6 = 11500+2000 = 13500

Maintenance cost in Year 7 = 13500+2000 = 15500

Salvage value = $3000*5 =$15000

Saving in Year 1 = $70000

Saving in Year 2 = 70000+4100 = 74100

Saving in Year 3 = 74100+4100 = 78200

Saving in Year 4 = 78200+4100 = 82300

Saving in Year 5 = 82300+4100 = 86400

Saving in Year 6 = 86400+4100 = 90500

Saving in Year 7 = 90500+4100 = 94600

Cashflow can be calculated as follows:

YR0 YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7
Initial Cost -125000
Maintenance Cost -3500 -5500 -7500 -9500 -11500 -13500 -15500
Salvage Value 15000
Savings 70000 74100 78200 82300 86400 90500 94600
Total Cashflow -125000 66500 -5500+74100 -7500+78200 -9500+82300 -11500+86400 -13500+90500 -15500+15000+94600
Total Cashflow -125000 66500 68600 70700 72800 74900 77000 94100

Total Present Value can be calculated as follows:

YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7
Total Cashflow -125000 66500 68600 70700 72800 74900 77000 94100
Present Value -125000 =66500/(1+8%)^1 =68600/(1+8%)^2 =70700/(1+8%)^3 =72800/(1+8%)^4 =74900/(1+8%)^5 =77000/(1+8%)^6 =94100/(1+8%)^7
Present Value -125000 =66500/1.08 =68600/1.08^2 =70700/1.08^3 =72800/1.08^4 =74900/1.08^5 =77000/1.08^6 =94100/1.08^7
Present Value -125000 =66500/1.08 =68600/1.1664 =70700/1.260 =72800/1.3605 =74900/1.4693 =77000/1.5869 =94100/1.7138
Present Value -125000 61574.07 58813.44 56111.11 53509.74 50976.65 48522.28 54907.22
Total Present Value =-125000+61574.07+58813.44+56111.11+53509.74+50976.65+48522.28+54907.22
Total Present Value 259414.51

Since Present value of Alternate B is more it shall be chosen


Related Solutions

Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered for a production upgrade of a printing facility. Alternative A has a life of 2 years, first cost of $1200, annual reduction in maintenance cost (can be treated as revenue in this cash flow) of $650, and salvage value after 2 years of $250. Alternative B has a life of 3 years, first cost of $1650, annual reduction in maintenance cost of $790, and...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered for a production upgrade of a printing facility. Alternative A has a life of 2 years, first cost of $1200, annual reduction in maintenance cost (can be treated as revenue in this cash flow) of $650, and salvage value after 2 years of $250. Alternative B has a life of 3 years, first cost of $1650, annual reduction in maintenance cost of $790, and...
An automobile dealer has recently advertised for its new car. There are three alternatives of purchasing...
An automobile dealer has recently advertised for its new car. There are three alternatives of purchasing the car which are explained below. Alternative 1 The customer can take delivery of a car after making a down payment of Rs. 25,000. The remaining money should be paid in 36 equal monthly installments of Rs. 10,000 each. 86 Engineering Economics Alternative 2 The customer can take delivery of the car after making a down payment of Rs. 1,00,000. The remaining money should...
Q1)​A company is considering two location alternatives for a new facility. The management has identified the...
Q1)​A company is considering two location alternatives for a new facility. The management has identified the relevant factors for choosing a location and scored the non-quantitative factors as shown below. FACTOR WEIGHT LOCATION A LOCATION B Labor availability 20 80 95 Supplier network 20 90 85 Quality of life 15 95 100 Initial fixed cost 5 Operating cost 35 Business friendliness 5 50 90 Initial fixed cost and operating cost are quantitative factors. The firm management is undecided about how...
You are a manager at PopUp Company, who manufactures toaster ovens. Your company produces two types...
You are a manager at PopUp Company, who manufactures toaster ovens. Your company produces two types of toaster ovens: basic and deluxe.  PopUp Company currently uses a traditional unit-based costing system, however, you feel strongly the company should switch to an activity-based costing system. You believe this change would provide you more accurate costing information, which would allow for better strategic decision making. Required: 1.Compare the traditional and activity-based cost management systems. Give advantages and disadvantages of each and discuss how...
6. Consider the two loan financing alternatives: Home Value = $180,000 Two Financing Alternatives #1: 70%...
6. Consider the two loan financing alternatives: Home Value = $180,000 Two Financing Alternatives #1: 70% Loan to Value (LTV), 7.5% Interest Rate, 30 Years #2: 80% Loan to Value (LTV), 8% Interest Rate, 30 Years What are the monthly payments with alternatives 1 and 2? What is the incremental borrowing cost for the additional amount borrowed through alternative 2 (i.e., the loan with the higher LTV)? Suppose you expect to relocate after 11 years, but you do not have...
A borrower is purchasing a property for $725,000 and can choose between two possible loan alternatives....
A borrower is purchasing a property for $725,000 and can choose between two possible loan alternatives. The first is 85% LTV loan for 30 years at 3.5% interest and 1 point and the second is at 70% LTV loan for 30 years at 2.875% interest and no points. Assuming the loan will be held until maturity, what is the incremental cost of borrowing the extra money? A) 6.14% B) 6.7% C)6.33% D)7.74%
A borrower is purchasing a property for $725,000 and can choose between two possible loan alternatives....
A borrower is purchasing a property for $725,000 and can choose between two possible loan alternatives. The first is an 85% loan for 30 years at 3.5% interest and 1 point and the second is a 70% loan for 30 years at 2.875% interest and no points. Assuming the loan will be repaid in 5 years, what is the incremental cost of borrowing the extra money? A. 6.14% B. 6.7% C. 6.33% D. 7.74%
When purchasing a $260,000 house, a borrower is comparing two loan alternatives. The first loan is...
When purchasing a $260,000 house, a borrower is comparing two loan alternatives. The first loan is a 90% loan at 8.5% for 25 years. The second loan is an 85% loan for 7.75% over 15 years. Both have monthly payments and the property is expected to be held over the life of the loan. What is the incremental cost of borrowing the extra money?
When purchasing a $260,000 house, a borrower is comparing two loan alternatives. The first loan is...
When purchasing a $260,000 house, a borrower is comparing two loan alternatives. The first loan is a 90% loan at 8.5% for 25 years. The second loan is an 85% loan for 7.75% over 15 years. Both have monthly payments and the property is expected to be held over the life of the loan. What is the incremental cost of borrowing the extra money? could you please show the work
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT