Question

In: Economics

Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered...

Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered for a production upgrade of a printing facility. Alternative A has a life of 2 years, first cost of $1200, annual reduction in maintenance cost (can be treated as revenue in this cash flow) of $650, and salvage value after 2 years of $250. Alternative B has a life of 3 years, first cost of $1650, annual reduction in maintenance cost of $790, and salvage value after 3 years of $250. MARR = 8%. Alternatives are replicable in the future. Calculate the NPW of each alternative. Show calculation steps leading to this choice and provide explanations whenever possible.

Solutions

Expert Solution

In the given question, the life of the alternatives is not equal. So, for the evaluation, use the common multiple method and convert the unequal life into equal life. The Alternative A has 2 years of life and Alternative B has 3 years of life. The LCM of 2 and 3 is 6. Hence, the common time period will be 6 years. Alternative A is to repeated 3 times and Alternative B is to be repeated 2 times.

NPW of Alternative A

Initial Cost = 1,200

Annual revenues = 650 per year

Salvage Value = 250

MARR = 8%

NPW = -1,200 – 1,200 (P/F, 8%, 2) – 1,200 (P/F, 8%, 4) + 650 (P/A, 8%, 6) + 250 (P/F, 8%, 2) + 250 (P/F, 8%, 4) + 250 (P/F, 8%, 6)

NPW = -1,200 – 1,200 (0.85734) – 1,200 (0.73503) + 650 (4.62288) + 250 (0.85734) + 250 (0.73503) + 250 (0.63017)

NPW = 449.66

NPW of Alternative B

Initial Cost = 1,650

Annual revenues = 790 per year

Salvage Value = 250

MARR = 8%

NPW = -1,650 – 1,650 (P/F, 8%, 3) + 790 (P/A, 8%, 6) + 250 (P/F, 8%, 3) + 250 (P/F, 8%, 6)

NPW = -1,650 – 1,650 (0.79383) + 790 (4.62288) + 250 (0.79383) + 250 (0.63017)

NPW = 1,048.25

From the above calculations, select the Alternative B.


Related Solutions

Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered for a production upgrade of a printing facility. Alternative A has a life of 2 years, first cost of $1200, annual reduction in maintenance cost (can be treated as revenue in this cash flow) of $650, and salvage value after 2 years of $250. Alternative B has a life of 3 years, first cost of $1650, annual reduction in maintenance cost of $790, and...
Two mutually exclusive cost alternatives, Machine A and Machine B, are being evaluated. Given the following...
Two mutually exclusive cost alternatives, Machine A and Machine B, are being evaluated. Given the following time events and incremental cash flow, if the MARR is 12% per year, which alternative (Machine A or Machine B) should be selected on the basis of the incremental rate of return analysis? Assume Machine B requires the extra $10,000 initial investment. (You can use Excel).                                                                                                                       Year Incremental Cash Flow ($) (Machine B - Machine A) 0 -10,000 1 - 4 1,300 5...
ABC Printing Corporation is considering purchasing a new printing machine. The following information relates to the...
ABC Printing Corporation is considering purchasing a new printing machine. The following information relates to the proposed machine: The proposed machine will be disposed at the end of its usable life of four years at an estimated sale price of K800 000. The machine has an original purchase price of K8 000 000, installation cost of K500 000, and will be depreciated under the five year WTA using the rates provided below. WTA Depreciation Schedule Year Depreciation Rate 1 25%...
Two alternative machines, A and B, as being considered as replacements for an older, worn-out machine....
Two alternative machines, A and B, as being considered as replacements for an older, worn-out machine. The cash flows for the two mutually exclusive alternatives are presented in the following table; the MARR is 12%. Select the best alternative using the NPV criterion. End of Year Machine A Machine B 0 -$20,000 -$28,000 1 $ 4,864 $8,419 2 $ 4,864 $8,419 3 $ 4,864 $8,419 4 $ 4,864 $8,419 5 $ 4,864 $8,419 6 $ 4,500 $8,419
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinery....
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinery. One of these alternatives must be selected. a. Which environmental protection equipment alternative should be​ selected? The​ firm's MARR is ​20% per year. Assume the equipment will be needed indefinitely. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. b. Assume the study period is shortened to five years. The market value of Alternative B after five years is estimated to be ​$16000. Which alternative would...
Two alternatives to investing in an e-commerce business with a five-year horizon are being considered. The...
Two alternatives to investing in an e-commerce business with a five-year horizon are being considered. The first alternative (A) has an initial investment cost of 21,000 Euros and it is estimated that an additional investment cost of 10,000 Euros will be required in the third year (due to the necessary adjustment of the content in the online material). Benefits of around 12,000 Euros per year are expected and the entire investment will have a final value estimated at 15,000 Euros...
The following two investment alternatives are being evaluated using the​ B/C ratio method. The alternatives have...
The following two investment alternatives are being evaluated using the​ B/C ratio method. The alternatives have a​ 5-year service life and the MARR is 18​% per year. Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment ​$10,900    ​$16,000    Annual revenues 4,000   7,500   Annual costs 250   900   Market value at EOY 5 5,000   9,200   Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when i equals=18​%per year. Calculate the modified​ B/C ratio of Alternative A A. 1.32 B.1.35 C.1.26 D.0.90...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. A decision maker must select one of these alternatives. A B Investment cost $50,000 $30,000 Annual Revenue 15,000 10,000 Salvage value 5,000 3,000 Useful life (yrs.) 5 5 For all parts below, do not convert from another form of equivalent worth; e.g., AW→FW. 1. Compute the AW for Alt A. Based on this measure, should the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT