Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Students in a business statistics course performed a completely randomized design to test the strength of...

Students in a business statistics course performed a completely randomized design to test the strength of four brands of trash bags. One-pound weights were placed into a bag, one at a time, until the bag broke. A total of 40 bags, 10 for each brand, were used. The data in give the weight (in pounds) required to break the trash bags. Dataset: Trashbags

  1. At the 0.05 level of significance, is there evidence of a difference in the mean strength of the four brands of trash bags?
  2. If appropriate, determine which brands differ in mean strength.
  3. At the 0.05 level of significance, is there evidence of a difference in the variation in strength among the four brands of trash bags?
    Kroger Glad Hefty TuffStuff
    34 32 33 26
    30 42 34 18
    40 34 32 20
    38 36 40 15
    36 32 40 20
    30 40 34 20
    30 36 36 17
    42 43 34 18
    36 30 32 19
    38 38 34 20

Solutions

Expert Solution

(a) The hypothesis being tested is:

H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = µ4

Ha: At least one means is not equal

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Factor 3 1986.5 662.16 48.11 0.000
Error 36 495.5 13.76
Total 39 2482.0

The p-value is 0.000.

Since the p-value (0.000) is less than the significance level (0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we can conclude that there is a difference in the mean strength of the four brands of trash bags.

(b) Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Factor N Mean Grouping
Glad 10 36.30 A
Kroger 10 35.40 A
Hefty 10 34.900 A
TuffStuff 10 19.300 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

(c) The hypothesis being tested is:

Null hypothesis All variances are equal
Alternative hypothesis At least one variance is different
Significance level α = 0.05

Test

Method Test
Statistic
P-Value
Multiple comparisons 0.576
Levene 1.46 0.242

The p-value is 0.242.

Since the p-value (0.242) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we can conclude that there is no difference in the variation in strength among the four brands of trash bags.


Related Solutions

Students in a business statistics course performed a completely randomized design to test the strength of...
Students in a business statistics course performed a completely randomized design to test the strength of four brands of trash bags. One-pound weights were placed into a bag, one at a time, until the bag broke. A total of 24 bags, 6 for each brand, were used. The data in the accompanying table give the weight (in pounds) required to break the trash bags. Brand 1 Brand 2 Brand 3 Brand 4 31 42 34 22 40 36 38 16...
Students in a business statistics course performed a single factor analysis to test the strength of...
Students in a business statistics course performed a single factor analysis to test the strength of three brands of trash bags. One-pound weights were placed into a bag one at a time until the bag broke. A total of 30 bags, 10 for each brand, were used. An Analysis of Variance was performed on the data to determine if the average breaking strengths were the same for the three brands. The value of MSW in the resulting ANOVA table was...
Students in a business statistics course performed a single factor analysis to test the strength of...
Students in a business statistics course performed a single factor analysis to test the strength of three brands of trash bags. One-pound weights were placed into a bag one at a time until the bag broke. A total of 30 bags, 10 for each brand, were used. An Analysis of Variance was performed on the data to determine if the average breaking strengths were the same for the three brands. The value of MSW in the resulting ANOVA table was...
The following data are from a completely randomized design.
You may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question. The following data are from a completely randomized design. Treatment A B C 162 142 126 142 157 123 166 123 138 144 142 140 148 137 150 168 157 127 Sample mean 155 143 134 Sample variance 135.6 166.0 108.4 (a) Compute the sum of squares between treatments. (b) Compute the mean square between treatments. (c) Compute the sum of squares due to error. (d) Compute the...
i.Briefly describe the three methods of  CRD( completely randomized design) , RCBD(randomized complete block design), FD(factorial design)....
i.Briefly describe the three methods of  CRD( completely randomized design) , RCBD(randomized complete block design), FD(factorial design). You can present this part using Table or Figure. ii.What are the similarities and differences between CRD( completely randomized design , RCBD(randomized complete block design), FD(factorial design)? You can present this part using Table or Figure.
23.(8 pts) An algebra test is given to students at the beginning of a statistics course....
23.(8 pts) An algebra test is given to students at the beginning of a statistics course. The algebra test scores and the final statistics grades are collected for several randomly selected students and the results are given below. x = Algebra 80 78 75 63 84 y = Statistics 77 92 87 81 68 a. n = _____ r = ___________b0 =________ b1 = _____________ ?bar = __________ b. Test the claim that there is a linear correlation using the...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use α =...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use α = 0.05 (level of significance) Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3 63 82 69 47 72 54 54 88 61 40 66 48 sample mean 51 77 58 sample variance 96.67 97.34 81.99 a. Use analysis of variance to test for a significant difference among the means of the three treatments. b. Use Fisher’s LSD procedure to determine which means are different.
Develop the analysis of variance computations for the following completely randomized design. At α = 0.05,...
Develop the analysis of variance computations for the following completely randomized design. At α = 0.05, is there a significant difference between the treatment means? Treatment A B C 135 106 93 120 114 82 114 124 84 106 104 102 132 107 90 115 108 117 128 96 110 102 115 120 104 99 82 93 xj 119 106 99 sj2 143.71 128.67 173.56 State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: Not all the population means are equal. Ha:...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use α =...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use α = 0.05. Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3 64 81 68 48 71 55 53 88 60 43 64 49 xj 52 76 58 sj2 80.67 112.67 64.67 (a)Use analysis of variance to test for a significant difference among the means of the three treatments. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: At least two of the population means are equal. Ha: At least two...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use α =...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use α = 0.05. Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3 62 83 68 46 71 55 53 88 62 39 70 47 xj 50 78 58 sj2 96.67 79.33 82.00 (a) Use analysis of variance to test for a significant difference among the means of the three treatments. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: At least two of the population means are equal. Ha: At least...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT