Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Researchers at Johns Hopkins decide to use a case control study design to explore the association...

Researchers at Johns Hopkins decide to use a case control study design to explore the association between women with breast cancer and DDT exposure. They interview women that have breast cancer undergoing chemo at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore in 2014 and then take blood samples to test for DDT exposure. They also enroll a group of controls (without breast cancer) in the study based on patient lists at the hospital and also test them for DDT exposure. They find that that 360 of the women with breast cancer have DDT, exposure while 1,079 do not. Among the controls 432 have DDT exposure, and 2,446 do not.

A. Create an appropriate 2x2 table for this data.

Breast Cancer (Cases) No Breast Cancer (Controls)
DDT EXPOSURE 360 432
NO DDT EXPOSURE 1,079 2,446

B. Calculate the odds ratio comparing the odds of exposure for those with breast cancer to the odds of exposure for those without breast cancer (show work please)

C. Assume that this OR is significant. What does this OR mean (be specific using the context of this study)?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Result:

Researchers at Johns Hopkins decide to use a case control study design to explore the association between women with breast cancer and DDT exposure. They interview women that have breast cancer undergoing chemo at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore in 2014 and then take blood samples to test for DDT exposure. They also enroll a group of controls (without breast cancer) in the study based on patient lists at the hospital and also test them for DDT exposure. They find that that 360 of the women with breast cancer have DDT, exposure while 1,079 do not. Among the controls 432 have DDT exposure, and 2,446 do not.

A. Create an appropriate 2x2 table for this data.

Breast Cancer (Cases)

No Breast Cancer (Controls)

DDT EXPOSURE

360

432

NO DDT EXPOSURE

1,079

2,446

B. Calculate the odds ratio comparing the odds of exposure for those with breast cancer to the odds of exposure for those without breast cancer (show work please)

For cancer: people who exposure / people who did not = 360/1079

People who No cancer people who exposure / people who did not = 432/2446

Dividing the two results, we get (360/1079) / (432/2446) = 1.889

Odds ratio= 1.889

C. Assume that this OR is significant. What does this OR mean (be specific using the context of this study)?

The odds are 1.889 times higher ( or 88.9% more than) that a person with DDT exposure will get the Breast Cancer compared to a person without DDT exposure.


Related Solutions

A. Researchers conducted a case control study to identify the association between alcohol consumption and esophageal...
A. Researchers conducted a case control study to identify the association between alcohol consumption and esophageal cancer among men. They enrolled 187 men with esophageal cancer and 715 men without esophageal cancer. The men were asked about their regular alcohol consumption and the men were categorized as either drinking ≥80 g/day (exposed) or <80 g/day (unexposed). Among the men with esophageal cancer, 92 drank ≥80 g of alcohol per day; 177 of the men without esophageal cancer drank ≥80 g...
Researcher A conducts a case-control study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the...
Researcher A conducts a case-control study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of endometrial cancer. The results of the study indicate a lower risk of cancer with vegetable consumption. Researcher B conducts a cross-sectional study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of endometrial cancer. The results of the study indicate a higher risk of cancer with vegetable consumption. Conduct research by reading the articles and journals on endometrial cancer. Based...
Researchers found a crude odds ratio of 1.8 in a case-control study.
Researchers found a crude odds ratio of 1.8 in a case-control study.  They stratified their analysis within levels of a binary potential confounder and found an odds ratio of 1.2 in one level of the confounder and an odds ratio of 2.8 in the other level of the confounder.   A. Do you think they should present the adjusted odds ratio in the report of their results?   B. Why or why not?
Investigators conducted a case control study to determine if there was an association between asthma symptoms...
Investigators conducted a case control study to determine if there was an association between asthma symptoms and exposure to dust (dust or no dust). They collected information from 62 matched pairs of cases (those experiencing asthma symptoms) and controls (those not experiencing asthma symptoms). They entered their observed counts in SAS using the code below: data study; input case $ control $ count @@; cards; dust dust 10 dust no_dust 35 no_dust dust 12 no_dust no_dust 5 ; run; a)...
You are conducting a case control study to determine if an association exists between melanoma and...
You are conducting a case control study to determine if an association exists between melanoma and indoor tanning. From a statewide cancer registry, you identify 1,107 people who were diagnosed with melanoma during the last three years. You select 1,500 controls for your study. Through a follow-up survey, you find that 696 of those with melanoma had a history of indoor tanning. 48.2% of the control group reported no exposure to indoor tanning. Part I: Calculate the odds ratio. Part...
In a hypothetical case-control study, researchers are interested in exploring the activities and behaviors of individuals...
In a hypothetical case-control study, researchers are interested in exploring the activities and behaviors of individuals at Northwestern University that may be associated with increased risk for testing positive for COVID-19. a. What inclusion and exclusion criteria would you use? Why? b. Define who is considered a case. How might you identify cases? c. Carefully define who is in the control group. How might you accurately identify control individuals? d. For the case-control study, how would you collect information on...
Endometrial Cancer Researcher A conducts a case-control study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables...
Endometrial Cancer Researcher A conducts a case-control study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of endometrial cancer. The results of the study indicate a lower risk of cancer with vegetable consumption. Researcher B conducts a cross-sectional study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of endometrial cancer. The results of the study indicate a higher risk of cancer with vegetable consumption. Conduct research by reading the articles and journals on endometrial...
Endometrial Cancer Researcher A conducts a case-control study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables...
Endometrial Cancer Researcher A conducts a case-control study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of endometrial cancer. The results of the study indicate a lower risk of cancer with vegetable consumption. Researcher B conducts a cross-sectional study to explore the consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of endometrial cancer. The results of the study indicate a higher risk of cancer with vegetable consumption. Conduct research by reading the articles and journals on endometrial...
Consider a case-control study of the possible association between alcohol consumption and the risk of esophageal...
Consider a case-control study of the possible association between alcohol consumption and the risk of esophageal cancer as reported by Tyns et al. (1977). The study entailed 200 males diagnosed with esophageal cancer in one of the regional hospitals between the years1972 and 1974, and controls were a sample of 775 adult males selected from electoral lists in each community. The data on alcohol consumption dichotomized at a value of 80 g/d for cases and controls are summarized below: Average...
Which study design is best to minimize confounders--cohort or case-control?
Which study design is best to minimize confounders--cohort or case-control?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT