An experiment was conducted to compare the alcohol content of soy sauce on two different production...

An experiment was conducted to compare the alcohol content of soy sauce on two different production lines. Production was monitored eight times a day in both production lines. Production line 1 has a sample standard deviation of 0.15 and Production line 2 has a sample standard deviation of 0.8. Assume both populations are normal.

State and conclude your hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance if the both of production lines have the same variability?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Above problem is solved using Minitab as well as Manually,

Dear student,
I am waiting for your feedback. I have given my 100% to solve your queries. If you satisfied with my answer then please please like this.
Thank You

orchestra answered 11 months ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

An experiment was conducted to compare the lifetimes of two different car batteries(from two different manufacturer)...

An experiment was conducted to compare the lifetimes of two different car batteries(from two different manufacturer) that both claim a lifetime of at least 4 years. 12 batteries from apremium manufacturer were tested and the results were a mean lifetime of 4.31 years with a standarddeviation of 0.39 years. 15 batteries from a budget manufacturer were tested and the results werea mean lifetime of 3.94 years with a standard deviation of 0.63 years. Can you conclude up to aα= 0.05level...

Question 1 John is the production manager of Kam Kee Limited, a famous soy sauce manufacturer...

Question 1 John is the production manager of Kam Kee Limited, a famous soy sauce manufacturer in Hong Kong. Currently, he is reviewing the possibility of replacing the old brewing system in order to boost production volume. The old brewing system was purchased eight years ago with a total cost of $6,600,000. It has a 12-year economic life with four years remaining and zero salvage value. If this system were to be sold today, it would be worth $2,200,000. The...

Question 1 John is the production manager of Kam Kee Limited, a famous soy sauce manufacturer...

An experiment is conducted to compare the effects of weathering on paint of three different types....

An experiment is conducted to compare the effects of weathering on paint of three different types. To do so, identical surfaces are coated with some paint of each type that has been exposed to four different environments. Measurements of the degree of deterioration we made for each surface. The data set is uploaded to Moodle. What can you say about the different paint types and different environments and their effects on the paint degradation? Deterioration Paint Type Environment 9.42 A...

An experiment to test the effects of alcohol on motor skills was conducted for a group...

An experiment to test the effects of alcohol on motor skills was conducted for a group that drank alcohol and a group that had a placebo. The 22 individuals in the alcohol group had a mean error rate of 4.20 and a standard deviation of 2.20. The 22 individuals in the placebo group had a mean error rate of 1.71 and a standard deviation of 0.72. a. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the population means. b....

An experiment is conducted to compare four different formulations (which we will call A, B, C...

An experiment is conducted to compare four different formulations (which we will call A, B, C and D) on the tensile strength of cement. The resulting values are given in the table below. A B C D 28642864 28192819 29342934 29592959 26702670 29242924 30593059 31583158 27032703 29992999 31083108 32203220 Use the Kruskal-Wallis test to test for differences among the formulations. To 4 decimal place accuracy, the value of the test statistic is To 4 decimal place accuracy, the p-value is

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Thirty minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with an α of 0.01? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 6.5 1.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Thirty minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with an α of 0.05? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 2.5 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Twenty-five minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with an α of 0.05? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...

An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Twenty-five minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with α = 0.01? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 6.2 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1 2.1...

Subjects