Question

Please respond to each of the following case scenarios. Your perspective is that of a Supervisor or as an observer evaluating the supervisor’s decision in each of the scenarios, unless otherwise advised. Ensure that you identify the specific prohibited grounds, if you find that there is the basis for a Human Rights complaint. Also, make sure that you address the relevant issues in each case and provide an explanation, as needed. Limit your response for each scenario, to about 150 words per scenario, but if you need more words for some scenarios, then go ahead.

1. You meet your friend Clement, for lunch and he is upset. A new buyer has purchased his company and Clement was just told by his supervisor that he is being terminated without cause. Clement is a junior designer has been with the company for 4 ½ years. He tells you that the company is offering him 7 weeks of pay as severance, and that his supervisor told him that this offer is “quite generous.” He wants to call a lawyer and sue the Company as he tells you, “I am a good employee. I am the most productive on my team and I follow all the rules. This is so unfair.” He asks you for your advice, knowing that you understand Employment Law better than he does. Should Clement accept the Company’s offer or should he retain a lawyer to sue the Company? Explain the pros and cons of each option fully in making your clear recommendation.

Answer 1

Ans: Employment Law:

Employment law is the combination of rules also jurisdictions that improve bonds linking companies also workers. It depicts that when an entrepreneur can retain workers furthermore while during the workers can operate.

Yes, he retains a lawyer to sue the company under employment law as this law negotiates the alliance within employes, contracting articles, enterprise organizations including the chamber.

Pros:

• If he hires a lawyer and wins the case in that situation he will not lose his job.
• He can also work in that company being a good employee as in a previous company.
• He will be an asset to that company as he was the most productive and also follows all the rules in his previous company and also company need skilled and hardworking employees for the organization.

Cons:

• It may possible that the new company will not let him involve in some projects and as a result, he will not work and it can affect even his salary also.
• It was not easy to work for a different company with different scenarios.
• It may be possible that the expertise and knowledge he uses in his previous company can not be used in the new company and as result, he may degrade his performance level.