In: Statistics and Probability
A recent study by the Center for Disease Control claims that a new super-contagious virus will impact a population in which it is found if left unchecked. A recent occurrence of this virus happened on an very isolated island nation with over 30,000 inhabitants. In randomly testing 400 residents of this island after the virus outbreak, a research team found 330 tested positive for having been infected by the virus.
H0:
H1:
K) Based upon the work above (and assuming requirements of the hypothesis tests are met), is there statistically sufficient evidence in this sample to support the claim that the percentage of a population that will be infected by the virus if left unchecked will be over 80%? Explain your reasoning.
A. From the given information, p-hat= 330/400= 0.825
B. We can use this proportion for the whole population, since we have used a sufficiently large sample of 400 to estimate this proportion.
C. We are testing,
H0: p=0.8
vs H1: p not equal 0.8
2. A. To determine what type of test to use, we look at H1. H1 above has not equal to sign, hence it's a two tailed test(if H1 had > sign then it would have been right tailed, if H1 had < sign then it would have been left tailed test)
B. A Type I error is Rejection of a true null hypothesis. Here it would be concluding that p is not equal to 0.8, when p is actually 0.8