Question

In: Economics

Some economists and policymakers argue in favor of replacing the current income tax in the USA...

  • Some economists and policymakers argue in favor of replacing the current income tax in the USA with consumption tax. What are your opinions on the issue? How do think such change impacts your income and expenditure pattern? Which tax method do you prefer- Income tax or consumption tax? Why? What are the pros and cons of the two tax methods?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A consumption tax essentially taxes people on every point of consumption of goods and services or in other words they are taxed whenever they spend money. Whereas the income tax you're taxed when you earn money from different sources like interest on loans or savings, dividends on shares held, capital gains (increase in the share prices) and so on. And in a consumption tax that wouldn't be the case, you would only be taxed when you actually spend money.

A higher consumption tax and a lower or insignificant income tax will make the states more attractive as a business hub to different corporations, employers and employees (who will have to pay no income tax on their salaries) and would simplify their tax code, and would curb government spending.

Many economists agree with the view that the economy would be better served by consumption tax, rather than income tax. Their point is that that taxing consumption, rather than income, can lead to increased saving and investment. However, economist are also apprehensive that the burden shift will be more on the poor rather than the rich as consumption tax is not progressive and each and every individual of the society irrespective of his income will pay equal tax. This would contradict the principal of equity of taxation.

Some who praise the idea of consumption tax argue that illegal income, black money and unaccounted income will come under the tax purview with consumption tax which will surely increase the size of the revenue and therefore the economy. Tax evaders, those who make money through illegal sources and are paid under the table, would no longer have a tax advantage. They too are forced to pay sales/consumption tax each time they purchase goods or services. Another advantage of consumption tax is that it only applies to the spent money rather than earned which for a rational consumer who try to save is a boon. This also means that nobody is forced to pay tax like income taxes.

Overall, it could prove to be the better system if the principal of equity is taken care of and abuse could be controlled.


Related Solutions

Some politicians and economists argue that tax cuts are beneficial for the government budget balance and...
Some politicians and economists argue that tax cuts are beneficial for the government budget balance and are also beneficial for the economy in the short run and the long run. Explain their arguments and evaluate them briefly.
Some economists argue that the government intervention makes the economic outcome even worse. Some argue that...
Some economists argue that the government intervention makes the economic outcome even worse. Some argue that there are important economic roles of the government. What is your opinion? Does the government do good or bad? Briefly discuss.
Explain why some argue that income tax loopholes primarily benefit the rich.
Explain why some argue that income tax loopholes primarily benefit the rich.
Some economists argue as follows: Suppose that Y=Y* currently.  An increased rate of saving from income (a...
Some economists argue as follows: Suppose that Y=Y* currently.  An increased rate of saving from income (a lower rate of consumption) reduces interest rates by raising the supply of savings that can be borrowed.  Investors borrow the extra savings, and investment rises to replace the decline in consumption. Y remains at Y*.   Evaluate this argument. [Limit 80 words: 4 marks] Answer:
Why might both Keynesians and Neclassical Economists be in favor of The Tax Cut of 2017?...
Why might both Keynesians and Neclassical Economists be in favor of The Tax Cut of 2017? Why might they worry about it? (Hint: National Debt.)
A. Some economists argue strongly that monopoly (or monopoly power) is a huge problem for the...
A. Some economists argue strongly that monopoly (or monopoly power) is a huge problem for the economy, and that the government needs to take vigorous action to eliminate or control monopoly (through the use of anti-trust laws or regulation). Other economists seem to believe that monopoly really isn’t a problem that we need to worry about that much. (20) 1. Why do some economists worry so much about monopoly –in what ways do they believe that monopoly is inferior to...
Some economists and politicians argue that raising the minimum wage does a disservice to those it...
Some economists and politicians argue that raising the minimum wage does a disservice to those it tries to help. They claim that businesses will resist a higher minimum wage by laying off workers, moving their businesses offshore, or just closing down. Some sympathetic to the plight of the poor claim that society should deal with poverty in a different way, such as through private charities. Most opponents of a minimum wage claim that workers are free to seek better paying...
Some economists, such as Paul Krugman, argue for government to take a more Keynesian approach to...
Some economists, such as Paul Krugman, argue for government to take a more Keynesian approach to promoting economic growth—that government borrowing can be economically healthy, in developing infrastructure for future needs or to spend its way out of a recession. More conservative economists argue that a country’s economic growth over the long term is better obtained through a tighter monetary policy and a more aggressive approach to balancing the budget. Which is more important for a healthy economy, a balanced...
Why do economists argue that the tax definition of corporate profits overstates the true profits of...
Why do economists argue that the tax definition of corporate profits overstates the true profits of corporations? How can this mis-definition of profit affect the financial structure of the corporation? In what sense does the corporate income tax subject corporate profits to double taxation?
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT