Question

In: Economics

Some economists argue that the government intervention makes the economic outcome even worse. Some argue that...

Some economists argue that the government intervention makes the economic outcome even worse. Some argue that there are important economic roles of the government. What is your opinion? Does the government do good or bad?

Briefly discuss.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Government intervention-Government intervention is regulatory action taken by government that “interferes" with decisions made by individuals, groups and organizations about social and economic matters.

I agree that it is a little of both. Sometimes the government has to step in and take charge. If they didn't, the system would crumble. Certainly, the government needs to regulate many aspects of business and economic practice. The system couldn't function if there wasn't a governing body in charge, governmental action to provide public goods is essential and beneficial. But when the government becomes overly intrusive, it can do harm.

Market structure is very uncertain, so it becomes very important for the government to take decisions accordingly or whether to interfere or not depends upon how sound is our market.

In India where is perfect competition there becomes necessary government intervention because it is truly not perfectly competitive, very few are monopoly and largely oligopoly.

At various places like traffic control should be assigned to private players and should be given good salaries and should be organized and chained by a number of people in a hierarchy i.e. there should be proper system or we can say organizational structure, because government intervention in some countries is exploited fully by traffic police itself by taking bribes. So, here should be no government intervention.

Role of government- There are various roles of Government

The main role of the government is to establish security and justice in the land and make sure the constitution is upheld and that the roots of this country are never forsaken in any way .To "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity

Whether the government is good or bad really has to be looked at on a case by case basis rather than as a whole.


Related Solutions

Some politicians and economists argue that tax cuts are beneficial for the government budget balance and...
Some politicians and economists argue that tax cuts are beneficial for the government budget balance and are also beneficial for the economy in the short run and the long run. Explain their arguments and evaluate them briefly.
Some economists, such as Paul Krugman, argue for government to take a more Keynesian approach to...
Some economists, such as Paul Krugman, argue for government to take a more Keynesian approach to promoting economic growth—that government borrowing can be economically healthy, in developing infrastructure for future needs or to spend its way out of a recession. More conservative economists argue that a country’s economic growth over the long term is better obtained through a tighter monetary policy and a more aggressive approach to balancing the budget. Which is more important for a healthy economy, a balanced...
What are some of the economic arguments for and against government intervention in the market for...
What are some of the economic arguments for and against government intervention in the market for student loans? Do you believe that class size reductions will help student performance?
Some economists argue that the government should avoid active use of monetary and fiscal policy to...
Some economists argue that the government should avoid active use of monetary and fiscal policy to try to stabilize the economy. What are the key points of each side of the issue? Explain what opinion you support and why.
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss.
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss. Search entries...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss.
Why might some economists argue that plentiful commodities (natural resources & minerals) might be an economic...
Why might some economists argue that plentiful commodities (natural resources & minerals) might be an economic drag overall? What is your view, as for example regarding Russian oil and other such examples? discus through the article.... Raw materials need not undermine the countries that export them THE LAMP POSTS in Kliptown, South Africa, do not all stand up straight. One lists awkwardly, laden with cables carrying stolen electricity to a squatters' settlement nearby. Many families in this suburb of Soweto,...
(History of Economic Thought) Question. Even though he considered the analyses of some classical economists to...
(History of Economic Thought) Question. Even though he considered the analyses of some classical economists to be vulgar, Marx valued highly the contributions of economists like Smith and Ricardo, and considered them to be true scientists. In what sense did Marx consider their efforts in economics to be ‘scientific’?
economic argument for government intervention in the international trade.
economic argument for government intervention in the international trade.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT