Explain why some argue that income tax loopholes primarily benefit the rich.

Expert Solution

It is not illegal to have a tax loophole. It just seems that the person who benefits from the loophole often follows the tax law letter but not the spirit of the law. Ordinary taxpayers pay up to 35 per cent tax on their wages at regular income tax rates. However, the really rich are different from you and me in that they tend to make most of their money through investments rather than standard paychecks, meaning that most of their money is taxed at 15 per cent.

Many citizens on those tax rates have little, if any, cash left to spend after paying their bills. But by giving them the option, Congress members felt better about voting for a tax break which primarily benefits the wealthy. The advantages of deducting interest on mortgages are often geographically disproportionate. Even as high-income residents get more out of it, so do high-income, land- and housing-priced metropolitan areas. That has tended to be locations in California and the Northeast, historically.

Not to keep picking on homeowners but there's another residential deduction that needs to go: the interest deduction on a holiday home loan. Yes, some second-home owners are far from wealthy. But those who own a ski chalet in Aspen, Col., an ocean-view getaway along Miami's South Beach or a pied-a-terre in New York City where they are usually rich to rest after a late opening night on Broadway. And as an itemized deduction, they get to write off interest on those expensive second homes, for mortgage debt as high as $1 million.

Managers of most private equity funds get a percentage of the net gains as a management fee. This allowance is known as carried interest, and that is the wonderful part for the fund manager: Carried interest is not paid like normal interest on traditional savings accounts that most taxpayers receive. It is being paid as a gain in income.

Rahul Sunny answered 8 months ago

Some economists and policymakers argue in favor of replacing the current income tax in the USA...

Some economists and policymakers argue in favor of replacing the current income tax in the USA with consumption tax. What are your opinions on the issue? How do think such change impacts your income and expenditure pattern? Which tax method do you prefer- Income tax or consumption tax? Why? What are the pros and cons of the two tax methods?

Why are some countries rich with high per capita income and some countries poor with Low...

Why are some countries rich with high per capita income and some countries poor with Low per capita income?

Briefly argue against high tax rates on the rich from an equity standpoint, and then separately,...

Briefly argue against high tax rates on the rich from an equity standpoint, and then separately, from an efficiency standpoint.

Explain why some economists argue that payment by cheque is the same as giving trade credit....

Explain why some economists argue that payment by cheque is the same as giving trade credit. If this is the case and considering that cheques are drawn on bank current accounts (as are payments by bank debit cards), do cheque payments count as money?

Should we tax the rich more and give to the poor? Why should we tax the...

Should we tax the rich more and give to the poor? Why should we tax the rich more or why not give examples? What is the outcome of taxing the rich more or staying the same? With references please!

Tax on risk and capital. Some city-level officials argue that targeted tax breaks will be good...

Tax on risk and capital. Some city-level officials argue that targeted tax breaks will be good for their city. Other officials argue that there should be a state law that bans the use of targeted state-level tax breaks. Explain why both arguments are reasonable. Would it be reasonable for the same city-level official to make -or at least to believe in- both arguments simultaneously?

Under the tax benefit rule, $ of the state income tax refund is included in gross...

Under the tax benefit rule, $ of the state income tax refund is included in gross income in 2017.Myrna and Geoffrey filed a joint tax return in 2016. Their AGI was $97,325, and itemized deductions were $21,200, which included $16,960 in state income tax. In 2017, they received a $10,176 refund of the state income taxes that they paid in 2016. The standard deduction for married filing jointly in 2016 was $12,600. Under the tax benefit rule, $ of the...

It is argue that if a rich high wage country such as the United States were...

It is argue that if a rich high wage country such as the United States were to expand trade with a relatively poor and low wage country such as Mexico, then U.S. industry would migrate south, and U.S. wages would fall to the level of Mexico’s. What do you think about this argument?

Some politicians and economists argue that tax cuts are beneficial for the government budget balance and...

Some politicians and economists argue that tax cuts are beneficial for the government budget balance and are also beneficial for the economy in the short run and the long run. Explain their arguments and evaluate them briefly.

Apply the tax benefit rule to determine the amount of the state income tax refund included in gross income in 2020.

Exercise 5-26 (Algorithmic) (LO. 3)Apply the tax benefit rule to determine the amount of the state income tax refund included in gross income in 2020.If an amount is zero, enter "0".a. Myrna and Geoffrey filed a joint tax return in 2019. Their AGI was $79,825, and itemized deductions were $31,800, which included $25,440 in state income tax and no other state or local taxes. In 2020, they received a $15,264 refund of the state income taxes that they paid in 2019....

Question