Question

In: Psychology

This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy?

 This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy?

 (For this problem, accept the italicized part as factually true. The fallacy occurs with what this argument does with the facts.) On a full tank of gasoline for each car, on the same roadway under the same

 conditions, and being driven at the same speed by the same driver, car A goes 80 miles farther than does car B. Therefore, car A is more fuel efficient.

  •  Ad hominem

  •  Faulty appeal to tradition

  •  Ad populum

  •  Ad astra

  •  False infinitum

  •  Begging the question


Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer: Begging the question

Explanation: Here the premise is true and the conclusion is true. It does not leave any question. Here the conclusion is valid. It is not faulty appeal because there is no tradition. Ad populum fallacy is a part of false authority and there is no subject matter mentioned here. On the other hand it is not ad hominem as there is no opposite view against human beings.


Related Solutions

This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy?
 This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy? This fallacy occurs when we inject personality into something that doesn't involve personality, or when we exaggerate personality's role or relevance when personality isn't relevant to the degree claimed. Begging the question Faulty appeal to tradition Slippery slope Faulty appeal to authority Bandwagon Ad hominem Strawman
Which fallacy is most obvioulsy committed in the following argument? America—Love it or leave it! Multiple...
Which fallacy is most obvioulsy committed in the following argument? America—Love it or leave it! Multiple Choice False dilemma Appeal to ignorance Ad hominem Appeal to unqualified authority Complex question Appeal to the nation
5. Create your own three statement argument which clearly illustrates the interdependent pattern of support for a conclusion.
5. Create your own three statement argument which clearly illustrates the interdependent pattern of support for a conclusion. Write your argument in the well-crafted format (2.2). Topic = medical professionals (2.3). 6. Create your own three statement argument which clearly illustrates the independent pattern of support for a conclusion. Write your argument in the well-crafted format (2.2). Topic = justice (2.3).
Any argument that depends on an ambiguity commits the fallacy of equivocation the fallacy of begging...
Any argument that depends on an ambiguity commits the fallacy of equivocation the fallacy of begging the question the fallacy of appealing to ignorance the gambler's fallacy none of the above As a contestant on a game show you win the following prize. You are allowed to blindly choose one card from a regular deck. If you get a heart, you win $29; otherwise you win $13. The expected payoff of this opportunity is: $14 $15 $16 $17 $18 You...
What test does this argument fail? What fallacy does the argument contain? Seventy-three percent of the...
What test does this argument fail? What fallacy does the argument contain? Seventy-three percent of the people surveyed said that they wanted universal health care coverage. Fifty-four percent said that they were worried about the cost of the program or the quality of the care that would be provided. Therefore, the American people are opposed to the President’s health care reform legislation
A proton can accept an electron pair. This illustrates which definition of acids and bases? Amphoteric,...
A proton can accept an electron pair. This illustrates which definition of acids and bases? Amphoteric, Bronsted-Lowry, Arrhenius, or Lewis
The following passage contains an argument that commits at least one informal fallacy. Name the type...
The following passage contains an argument that commits at least one informal fallacy. Name the type of fallacy committed and explain why the passage is an example of that type. That biscotti ought to be good—I used only the best ingredients in it.
Clearly Identify the Syllogistic Rule(s) broken and Name the Formal Fallacy or Fallacies committed in each...
Clearly Identify the Syllogistic Rule(s) broken and Name the Formal Fallacy or Fallacies committed in each of these argumentative Passages: 1) EAO-2 2) OOI-4 3) III-3
Which of the following is the most accurate definition of the price elasticity of demand? a....
Which of the following is the most accurate definition of the price elasticity of demand? a. The percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in price. b. The total change in quantity demanded divided by the average price. c. The total change in demand divided by the total change in price. d. The percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in the price of a substitute.
Which of the following is an example of the ad hominem fallacy?
Which of the following is an example of the ad hominem fallacy?a.John assures his wife that it’s ethically acceptable for him to cheat on her because history is filled with spouses cheating on each other; it’s “natural,” says Johnb.Paul lost his job one month after President Obama was sworn into office. He concludes, therefore, that President Obama's policies caused his job lossc.George rejects Elvis's argument that America is a good country to live in; George reasons that Elvis's argument about...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT