In: Finance
A) In the first case, using Replacement Chain method, we need to repeat the project with the lower time scale in order to bring it similar to that of the project with larger time scale. In this case, the first project has to be repeated to twice. Thus the Cash flows and the NPV of the projects is as given below
Project A:
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
CF | -13000 | 5000 | 5000 | -8000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 |
Discount rate | 1 | 0.909091 | 0.826446 | 0.751315 | 0.683013 | 0.6209213 | 0.564474 |
DCF | -13000 | 4545.455 | 4132.231 | -6010.52 | 3415.067 | 3104.6066 | 2822.37 |
NPV | -990.789 |
Project B:
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
CF | -15000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 |
Discount rate | 1 | 0.909091 | 0.826446 | 0.751315 | 0.683013 | 0.6209213 | 0.564474 |
DCF | -15000 | 2727.273 | 2479.339 | 2253.944 | 2049.04 | 1862.764 | 1693.422 |
NPV | -1934.22 |
From the above NPVs, we can deduce that both the projects are loss making and we should not choose either of them. However, for comparison, Project A is better than Project B.
B) Using Equivalent Annual Annuity Method:
The formulae for calculating the Annual Annuity is
Equivalent Annuity cash flow = (Cost of capital x NPV) / (1 - (1 + Cost of capital)-t )
For Project A, Annuity cash flow = (0.1 x -990)/(1-(1+0.1)^-3) = -398.411
For Project B, Annuity cash flow = (0.1 x -1934.22)/(1-(1+0.1)^-6) = -444.111
Therefore, both the projects should be avoided. However, Project A is comparitively better than Project B.