Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A study2examines chocolate’s effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled...

A study2examines chocolate’s effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 11 people received 46 grams (1.6 ounces) of dark chocolate (which is naturally flavonoid-rich) every day for two weeks, while a control group of 10 people received a placebo consisting of dark chocolate with low flavonoid content. Participants had their vascular health measured (by means of flow-mediated dilation) before and after the two-week study. The increase over the two-week period was measured, with larger numbers indicating greater vascular health. For the group getting the good dark chocolate, the mean increase was 1.3 with a standard deviation of 2.32, while the control group had a mean change of -0.96 with a standard deviation of 1.58.Find a 95%confidence interval for the difference in means between the two groups CN−, whereCrepresents the mean increase in flow-mediated dilation for people eating dark chocolate every day and Nrepresents the mean increase in flow-mediated dilation for people eating a dark chocolate substitute eachday. .Does the scenario represent a confidence interval or a hypothesis test?b.Does the scenario represent a one population or two populations?c.What is the appropriate formula for this scenario?d.What does each symbol represent in the appropriate formula?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a.
TRADITIONAL METHOD
given that,
mean(x)=1.3
standard deviation , s.d1=2.32
number(n1)=11
y(mean)=-0.96
standard deviation, s.d2 =1.58
number(n2)=10
I.
standard error = sqrt(s.d1^2/n1)+(s.d2^2/n2)
where,
sd1, sd2 = standard deviation of both
n1, n2 = sample size
standard error = sqrt((5.382/11)+(2.496/10))
= 0.86
II.
margin of error = t a/2 * (standard error)
where,
t a/2 = t -table value
level of significance, α = 0.05
from standard normal table, two tailed and
value of |t α| with min (n1-1, n2-1) i.e 9 d.f is 2.262
margin of error = 2.262 * 0.86
= 1.944
III.
CI = (x1-x2) ± margin of error
confidence interval = [ (1.3--0.96) ± 1.944 ]
= [0.316 , 4.204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIRECT METHOD
given that,
mean(x)=1.3
standard deviation , s.d1=2.32
sample size, n1=11
y(mean)=-0.96
standard deviation, s.d2 =1.58
sample size,n2 =10
CI = x1 - x2 ± t a/2 * Sqrt ( sd1 ^2 / n1 + sd2 ^2 /n2 )
where,
x1,x2 = mean of populations
sd1,sd2 = standard deviations
n1,n2 = size of both
a = 1 - (confidence Level/100)
ta/2 = t-table value
CI = confidence interval
CI = [( 1.3--0.96) ± t a/2 * sqrt((5.382/11)+(2.496/10)]
= [ (2.26) ± t a/2 * 0.86]
= [0.316 , 4.204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
interpretations:
1. we are 95% sure that the interval [0.316 , 4.204] contains the true population proportion
2. If a large number of samples are collected, and a confidence interval is created
for each sample, 95% of these intervals will contains the true population proportion
b.
Given that,
mean(x)=1.3
standard deviation , s.d1=2.32
number(n1)=11
y(mean)=-0.96
standard deviation, s.d2 =1.58
number(n2)=10
null, Ho: u1 = u2
alternate, H1: u1 != u2
level of significance, α = 0.05
from standard normal table, two tailed t α/2 =2.262
since our test is two-tailed
reject Ho, if to < -2.262 OR if to > 2.262
c.
we use test statistic (t) = (x-y)/sqrt(s.d1^2/n1)+(s.d2^2/n2)
to =1.3--0.96/sqrt((5.3824/11)+(2.4964/10))
to =2.6291
| to | =2.6291
critical value
the value of |t α| with min (n1-1, n2-1) i.e 9 d.f is 2.262
we got |to| = 2.62906 & | t α | = 2.262
make decision
hence value of | to | > | t α| and here we reject Ho
p-value: two tailed ( double the one tail ) - Ha : ( p != 2.6291 ) = 0.027
hence value of p0.05 > 0.027,here we reject Ho
ANSWERS
---------------
d.
null, Ho: u1 = u2
alternate, H1: u1 != u2
test statistic: 2.6291
critical value: -2.262 , 2.262
decision: reject Ho
p-value: 0.027
we have enough evidence to support the claim that the difference in means between the two groups


Related Solutions

Design either a randomized controlled double blind experiment on a particular study of interest OR design...
Design either a randomized controlled double blind experiment on a particular study of interest OR design a matched pairs study. State how you have been able to eliminate bias in your study. Be highly specific in your answer. Your answer must be at least 8 COMPLETE sentences in length.
15.34 Treating insomnia. Belsomra is a drug prescribed for the treatment of insomnia. A randomized, placebo-controlled...
15.34 Treating insomnia. Belsomra is a drug prescribed for the treatment of insomnia. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial found that patients assigned to take Belsomra for three months fell asleep 35 minutes faster, on average, than they did before the study started—a statistically significant improvement. By comparison, patients assigned to take a placebo for three months fell asleep 27 minutes faster than they did originally. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (reported as P<0.01).14 Would you consider...
Explain the meaning of the following terms: a) placebo b) double-blind c) confounding d) response
Explain the meaning of the following terms: a) placebo b) double-blind c) confounding d) response
In a comparative double-blind randomized study of single dose fosfomycin trometamol with trimethoprim in the treatment...
In a comparative double-blind randomized study of single dose fosfomycin trometamol with trimethoprim in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary infections, 20 of 26 were cured with fosfomycin trometamol and 22 of 41 were cured with the reference drug trimethoprim. Denote the eradication rates for fosfomycin trometamol and the reference drug trimethoprim by p1p1 and p2p2 respectively. (a) Evaluate the test statistic Z=p̂ 1−p̂ 2p̂ (1−p̂ )(1n1+1n2)‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√.Z=p^1−p^2p^(1−p^)(1n1+1n2). Answer (b) Use the R function pnorm() and the value of the test statistic...
The Salk Vaccine Trials of 1954 included a randomized control double blind study in which elementary...
The Salk Vaccine Trials of 1954 included a randomized control double blind study in which elementary school children of consenting parents were assigned at random to injection with the Salk Vaccine or a placebo. Both treatment and control group were set at 200,000 because the target disease , infantile paralysis (POLIO) was uncommon, but in many cases deadly. The number in the control group ended up to be 199,858 and the number in the treatment group ended up to be...
1. what do the terms "double-blind" and "controlled" mean in the title of botulinum toxin type...
1. what do the terms "double-blind" and "controlled" mean in the title of botulinum toxin type A in MS-related tremor? 2. why did the treatment work to reduce tremor(trembling? 3. why was muscle weakness a side effect of the treatment? 4. what other ways is botulinum toxin used medically?
1. what do the terms "double-blind" and "controlled" mean in the title of botulinum toxin type...
1. what do the terms "double-blind" and "controlled" mean in the title of botulinum toxin type A in MS-related tremor? 2. why did the treatment work to reduce tremor(trembling? 3. why was muscle weakness a side effect of the treatment? 4. what other ways is botulinum toxin used medically?
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, infants were randomly divided into two groups....
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, infants were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second​ dose,114 of 726 subjects in the experimental group​ (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second​ dose, 71 of 607 of the subjects in the control group​ (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a...
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, monkeys were randomly divided into two groups....
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, monkeys were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second​ dose, 113 of 727 subjects in the experimental group​ (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second​ dose, 70 of 608 of the subjects in the control group​ (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that...
In randomized, double blind clinical trials of a new vaccine,Monkeys were randomly divided into two groups.Subjects...
In randomized, double blind clinical trials of a new vaccine,Monkeys were randomly divided into two groups.Subjects in group x received the new vaccine while subject in group y received a control vaccine.After the first dose, 118 of 715 subjects in the experimental group ( group x) experienced fever as a side effect. After the first dose, 56 of 606 of the subjects in the control group ( group y ) experienced fever as a side effect.Construct a 90 % confidence...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT