Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In a comparative double-blind randomized study of single dose fosfomycin trometamol with trimethoprim in the treatment...

In a comparative double-blind randomized study of single dose fosfomycin trometamol with trimethoprim in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary infections, 20 of 26 were cured with fosfomycin trometamol and 22 of 41 were cured with the reference drug trimethoprim.

Denote the eradication rates for fosfomycin trometamol and the reference drug trimethoprim by p1p1 and p2p2 respectively.

(a) Evaluate the test statistic

Z=p̂ 1−p̂ 2p̂ (1−p̂ )(1n1+1n2)‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√.Z=p^1−p^2p^(1−p^)(1n1+1n2).

Answer

(b) Use the R function pnorm() and the value of the test statistic from (a) to find the p-value for the test H0:p1=p2H0:p1=p2 versus HA:p1≠p2.HA:p1≠p2. Answer

(c) Calculate a 98% two-sided confidence interval for the difference p1−p2p1−p2using the formula

p̂ 1−p̂ 2±z⋆p̂ 1(1−p̂ 1)n1+p̂ 2(1−p̂ 2)n2‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√p^1−p^2±z⋆p^1(1−p^1)n1+p^2(1−p^2)n2

and the critical value z⋆=2.3263.z⋆=2.3263. The interval ranges from Answer to Answer .

(d) Find the p-value for the test H0:p1=p2H0:p1=p2 versus HA:p1≠p2HA:p1≠p2 using the R function prop.test().Answer

(e) Are the eradication rates for the two drugs significantly different? Use the result of (d) and significance level α=0.02α=0.02 to answer this question. Answeryesno

(f) Calculate a 98% two-sided confidence interval for the difference p1−p2p1−p2using the R function prop.test(). The interval ranges from Answer to Answer .

Solutions

Expert Solution

Here

a)The test statistic is

b) The P-value of the test is

R command is

> 2*pnorm(-2.0824659 )
[1] 0.03729993

c) The confidence interval for difference in means is

Here , the 98% CI is

The critical value is

R command below.
> qnorm(0.99)
[1] 2.326348

d) The R command below:

prop.test(c(20,22),c(26,41),alternative = c("two.sided"),conf.level = 0.98, correct = FALSE)

Output is:

   2-sample test for equality of proportions without continuity correction

data: c(20, 22) out of c(26, 41)
X-squared = 3.6816, df = 1, p-value = 0.05502
alternative hypothesis: two.sided
98 percent confidence interval:
-0.03149915 0.49678996
sample estimates:
prop 1 prop 2
0.7692308 0.5365854

The p-value = 0.05502.

e) 98 percent confidence interval:
-0.03149915 0.49678996

Since the confidence interval includes 0, the eradication rates for the two drugs significantly are not different.

f) 98 percent confidence interval:
-0.03149915 0.49678996


Related Solutions

Design either a randomized controlled double blind experiment on a particular study of interest OR design...
Design either a randomized controlled double blind experiment on a particular study of interest OR design a matched pairs study. State how you have been able to eliminate bias in your study. Be highly specific in your answer. Your answer must be at least 8 COMPLETE sentences in length.
The Salk Vaccine Trials of 1954 included a randomized control double blind study in which elementary...
The Salk Vaccine Trials of 1954 included a randomized control double blind study in which elementary school children of consenting parents were assigned at random to injection with the Salk Vaccine or a placebo. Both treatment and control group were set at 200,000 because the target disease , infantile paralysis (POLIO) was uncommon, but in many cases deadly. The number in the control group ended up to be 199,858 and the number in the treatment group ended up to be...
Spertus et al. performaed a randomized single blind study for subjects with stable coronary artery disease....
Spertus et al. performaed a randomized single blind study for subjects with stable coronary artery disease. They randomized subjects into two treatments groups. The first group had current angina medications optimized and the second group was tapered off existing medications and then started on long-acting diltiazem at 180mg/day. The researchers performed several tests to determine if there were significant differences in the two treatment groups at baseline. One of the characteristics of interest was the difference in the percentages of...
A study2examines chocolate’s effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled...
A study2examines chocolate’s effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 11 people received 46 grams (1.6 ounces) of dark chocolate (which is naturally flavonoid-rich) every day for two weeks, while a control group of 10 people received a placebo consisting of dark chocolate with low flavonoid content. Participants had their vascular health measured (by means of flow-mediated dilation) before and after the two-week study. The increase over the two-week period was measured, with...
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, infants were randomly divided into two groups....
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, infants were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second​ dose,114 of 726 subjects in the experimental group​ (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second​ dose, 71 of 607 of the subjects in the control group​ (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a...
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, monkeys were randomly divided into two groups....
In​ randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new​ vaccine, monkeys were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second​ dose, 113 of 727 subjects in the experimental group​ (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second​ dose, 70 of 608 of the subjects in the control group​ (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that...
In randomized, double blind clinical trials of a new vaccine,Monkeys were randomly divided into two groups.Subjects...
In randomized, double blind clinical trials of a new vaccine,Monkeys were randomly divided into two groups.Subjects in group x received the new vaccine while subject in group y received a control vaccine.After the first dose, 118 of 715 subjects in the experimental group ( group x) experienced fever as a side effect. After the first dose, 56 of 606 of the subjects in the control group ( group y ) experienced fever as a side effect.Construct a 90 % confidence...
For a single dose of a treatment a company has these costs: $100 of raw materials,...
For a single dose of a treatment a company has these costs: $100 of raw materials, $25 shipping, $25 proper storage containers. The company has invested $300 million in R&D. 4 doses of treatments are required per year per patient. On average, the company requires margins of 50% for their treatment. 1) What is the lowest price point the company will accept per patient for a complete year of treatment? What approach you are using? 2) What is the highest...
A randomized, double‑blind experiment studied whether magnetic fields applied over a painful area can reduce pain...
A randomized, double‑blind experiment studied whether magnetic fields applied over a painful area can reduce pain intensity. The subjects were 5050 volunteers with postpolio syndrome who reported muscular or arthritic pain. The pain level when pressing a painful area was graded subjectively on a scale from 00 to 1010 ; (where 00 is no pain, 1010 is maximum pain.) Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a magnetic device or a placebo device over the painful area for 4545 minutes....
A study of randomized controlled trial of animals facilitated therapy with dolphins in the treatment of...
A study of randomized controlled trial of animals facilitated therapy with dolphins in the treatment of (mild and moderate) depression collected the data as follows: Depression Improved Treatment Yes No Total Dolphin 10 5 15 Control 3 12 15 Total 13 17 30 Is the distribution of patients' depression significantly different between dolphin treatment and control treatment? Is there a treatment effect or could such a difference be explained by chance? Use the 8 step procedure to answer this question.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT