Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In a scientific study that attempts to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity...

In a scientific study that attempts to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity of the water near mines, samples of macro invertebrates were taken at the rate of a monthly sample for 12 months in two different locations. For the first locality, an average biodiversity index of 3.11 and a sample standard deviation of 0.771 were obtained. For the second locality the average biodiversity index was 2.04 with a standard deviation of 0.448.

a) BUILD and INTERPRET a 90% confidence interval for the difference in the means of the two localities assuming that the populations fit approximately a normal population and that the variances can be considered equal.

b) Evaluate whether the evidence supports the presumption of equal variances.

c) Would it have been better to use a 95% interval? Explain in detail.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)

mean of sample 1,    x̅1=   3.110              
standard deviation of sample 1,   s1 =    0.771              
size of sample 1,    n1=   12              
                      
Sample #2   ---->   2              
mean of sample 2,    x̅2=   2.040              
standard deviation of sample 2,   s2 =    0.448              
size of sample 2,    n2=   12              
                      
difference in sample means =    x̅1-x̅2 =    3.1100   -   2.0   =   1.07

Level of Significance ,    α =    0.1
      
Degree of freedom, DF=   n1+n2-2 =    22              
t-critical value =    t α/2 =    1.7171   (excel formula =t.inv(α/2,df)          
                      
pooled std dev , Sp=   √([(n1 - 1)s1² + (n2 - 1)s2²]/(n1+n2-2)) =    0.6305              
                      
std error , SE =    Sp*√(1/n1+1/n2) =    0.2574              
margin of error, E = t*SE =    1.7171   *   0.26   =   0.44  
                      
difference of means =    x̅1-x̅2 =    3.1100   -   2.040   =   1.0700
confidence interval is                       
Interval Lower Limit=   (x̅1-x̅2) - E =    1.0700   -   0.4420   =   0.628
Interval Upper Limit=   (x̅1-x̅2) + E =    1.0700   +   0.4420   =   1.512

we are 90% confident that the true difference in the means of the two localities lies within these limits

.....................

b)

Sample 1
s₁² =    0.594441
n₁ =    12


Sample 2
s₂² =    0.200704
n₂ =    12
α =    0.05

Null and alternative hypothesis:  
Hₒ : σ₁² = σ₂²  
H₁ : σ₁² ≠ σ₂²  
Test statistic:  
F = s₁² / s₂² = 0.594441 / 0.200704 =    2.96
Degree of freedom:  
df₁ = n₁-1 =    11
df₂ = n₂-1 =    11

P-value :  
P-value = 2*F.DIST.RT(2.9618, 11, 11) =    0.0853
Conclusion:  
As p-value > α, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.  

the evidence supports the presumption of equal variances.

....................

c)

Level of Significance ,    α =    0.05

Degree of freedom, DF=   n1+n2-2 =    22              
t-critical value =    t α/2 =    2.0739   (excel formula =t.inv(α/2,df)          
                      
pooled std dev , Sp=   √([(n1 - 1)s1² + (n2 - 1)s2²]/(n1+n2-2)) =    0.6305              
                      
std error , SE =    Sp*√(1/n1+1/n2) =    0.2574              
margin of error, E = t*SE =    2.0739   *   0.26   =   0.53  
                      
difference of means =    x̅1-x̅2 =    3.1100   -   2.040   =   1.0700
95% confidence interval is                       
Interval Lower Limit=   (x̅1-x̅2) - E =    1.0700   -   0.5338   =   0.536
Interval Upper Limit=   (x̅1-x̅2) + E =    1.0700   +   0.5338   =   1.604

95% CI will be wider than 90% CI

..................

Please let me know in case of any doubt.

Thanks in advance!


Please upvote!


Related Solutions

In a scientific study that tries to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity...
In a scientific study that tries to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity of the water near mines, samples of macro invertebrates were taken at the rate of a monthly sample for 12 months in two different locations. For the first locality, an average biodiversity index of 3.11 and a sample standard deviation of 0.771 were obtained. For the second locality the average biodiversity index was 2.04 with a standard deviation of 0.448. to. BUILD and INTERPRET...
In a scientific study that tries to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity...
In a scientific study that tries to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity of the water near mines, samples of macro invertebrates were taken at the rate of a monthly sample for 12 months in two different locations. For the first locality, an average biodiversity index of 3.11 and a sample standard deviation of 0.771 were obtained. For the second locality the average biodiversity index was 2.04 with a standard deviation of 0.448. a. Build and interpret...
In a scientific study that tries to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity...
In a scientific study that tries to relate the biodiversity of macro invertebrates to the acidity of the water near mines, samples of macro invertebrates were taken at the rate of a monthly sample for 12 months in two different locations. For the first locality, an average biodiversity index of 3.11 and a sample standard deviation of 0.771 were obtained. For the second locality the average biodiversity index was 2.04 with a standard deviation of 0.448. a). BUILD and INTERPRET...
The scientific productivity of major world cities was the subject of a recent study. The study...
The scientific productivity of major world cities was the subject of a recent study. The study determined the number of scientific papers published between 1994 and 1997 by researchers from each of the 20 world cities, and is shown below. City Number of papers City Number of papers City 1 66 City 11 1717 City 2 1919 City 12 1616 City 3 2525 City 13 1717 City 4 2424 City 14 66 City 5 1818 City 15 2626 City 6...
- Show an example of an observational study that looks or sounds scientific, with the reference....
- Show an example of an observational study that looks or sounds scientific, with the reference. 1 - Explain what makes the study look or seem scientific. 2 - Explain what the problems with the study are and some of the possible ramifications if you were to accept the claim(s) being made as true. 3 - Briefly discuss what might happen if many people accepted the claim(s) being made as true.
These questions relate to: Prime Editing 1. Describe (briefly) the scientific principle behind how the technology...
These questions relate to: Prime Editing 1. Describe (briefly) the scientific principle behind how the technology works. This may be complex and the goal here is to not get bogged down in so much detail that this becomes incomprehensible. 2. What was the basic research which made this possible? 3. Can you find any information from patents?
ASSIGNMENT - Philosophy of Science A) How does probability relate to scientific statements? B) Why should...
ASSIGNMENT - Philosophy of Science A) How does probability relate to scientific statements? B) Why should scientific tests be reproducible?
A recent study conducted by the state government attempts to determine whether the voting public supports...
A recent study conducted by the state government attempts to determine whether the voting public supports a further increase in cigarette taxes to help the public schools. The opinion poll recently sampled 1500 voting age citizens. 622 of the sampled citizens were in favor of an increase in taxes. The state government would like to decide if there is enough evidence to establish whether the proportion of citizens supporting an increase in cigarette taxes is significantly greater than 66%. At...
i want a case study, in which a specific Human Resources policies and practices attempts with...
i want a case study, in which a specific Human Resources policies and practices attempts with some difficulties to reach an alignment with UAE Labor Law and employment legislation and regulations.
Explain how and why The Middletown Series would be considered a macro study and The Up...
Explain how and why The Middletown Series would be considered a macro study and The Up Series a micro study.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT