In: Statistics and Probability
| 
 Percent Wound Healing  | 
||||
| 
 Treatment  | 
 0-25%  | 
 26-50%  | 
 51-75%  | 
 76-100%  | 
| 
 New Compound (n=125)  | 
 15  | 
 37  | 
 32  | 
 41  | 
| 
 Placebo (n=125)  | 
 36  | 
 45  | 
 34  | 
 10  | 
Is there a difference in the extent of wound healing by treatment? (Hint: Are treatment and the percent wound healing independent?) Run the appropriate test at a 5% level of significance.
| 
 Percent Wound Healing  | 
|||||
| 
 Treatment  | 
 0-25%  | 
 26-50%  | 
 51-75%  | 
 76-100%  | 
 Total  | 
| 
 Number of Patients  | 
 51  | 
 82  | 
 66  | 
 51  | 
 250  | 
Chi-square test of independence
The Chi-square test of independence is performed to test the association between the extent of wound healing and the type of treatment
Hypothesis:
H0: The two variables are independent
Ha: The two variables are dependent
Chi-Square statistic:
The observed values are,
| Percent Wound Healing | |||||
| Treatment | 0-25% | 26-50% | 51-75% | 76-100% | Total | 
| New Compound (n=125) | 15 | 37 | 32 | 41 | 125 | 
| Placebo (n=125) | 36 | 45 | 34 | 10 | 125 | 
| Total | 51 | 82 | 66 | 51 | 250 | 
The expected values are obtained using the following formula,

| Percent Wound Healing | |||||
| Treatment | 0-25% | 26-50% | 51-75% | 76-100% | Total | 
| New Compound (n=125) | 125*51/250=25.5 | 125*82/250=41 | 125*66/250=33 | 125*51/250=25.5 | 125 | 
| Placebo (n=125) | 125*51/250=25.5 | 125*82/250=41 | 125*66/250=33 | 125*51/250=25.5 | 125 | 
| Total | 51 | 82 | 66 | 51 | 250 | 
The Chi-Square value is obtained using the formula

| Observed, Oi | Expected, Ei | ![]()  | 
| 15 | 25.5 | 4.32 | 
| 37 | 41 | 0.39 | 
| 32 | 33 | 0.03 | 
| 41 | 25.5 | 9.42 | 
| 36 | 25.5 | 4.32 | 
| 45 | 41 | 0.39 | 
| 34 | 33 | 0.03 | 
| 10 | 25.5 | 9.42 | 
| Sum | 28.33 | 

Critical value:
The critical value for the chi-square statistic is obtained from the chi-square distribution table for,
degree of freedom = (r-1)(c-1) = (2-1)(4-1) = 3
Where r is the number of rows and c is the number of columns in the table.
For significance level = 0.05 and degree of freedom = 3, the critical value is,

Conclusion:
Since the chi-square value is greater than the critical value, It can be concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected at a 5% significance level.
Hence the extent of wound healing and the type of treatment are dependent.
Chi-Square Goodness of fit test
The Chi-Square Goodness of fit test is used here to test whether the samples are from normal distribution within a given proportion.
Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency.
Chi-Square statistic:
The observed values are,
| Treatment | Observed | 
| 0-25% | 51 | 
| 26-50% | 82 | 
| 51-75% | 66 | 
| 76-100% | 51 | 
| Total | 250 | 
The expected values are obtained by multiplying the total population by the given proportion,
| Treatment | Expected | 
| 0-25% | 250*0.30=75 | 
| 26-50% | 250*0.40=100 | 
| 51-75% | 250*0.20=50 | 
| 76-100% | 250*0.10=25 | 
The Chi-Square statistic is obtained using the formula,

| Treatment | Observed | Expected | ![]()  | 
| 0-25% | 51 | 75 | 7.68 | 
| 26-50% | 82 | 100 | 3.24 | 
| 51-75% | 66 | 50 | 5.12 | 
| 76-100% | 51 | 25 | 27.04 | 
| Total | 43.08 | 

Critical value:
The critical value for the chi-square statistic is obtained from the chi-square distribution table for,
degree of freedom = 4-1 = 3 and significance level = 0.05

Conclusion:
Since the chi-square statistic is greater than the critical value at a 5% significance level. it can be concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected. Hence we can conclude that the distribution of percent wound healing doesn't follow a normal distribution.