In: Economics
Two games that differ only in the timing of moves—one simultaneous, the other sequential move—can sometimes have completely different subgame-perfect equilibria. Why?
A. A simultaneous game has only one subgame while a sequential game has several.
B. The second mover cannot choose non-credible threats in the SPE of a sequential game.
C. A NE can never be also an SPE.
D. None of the other answers provided is correct.
E. The question does not make sense. Subgame-perfect equilibrium cannot be applied to simultaneous games.
Two games that differ only in the timing of moves—one simultaneous, the other sequential move—can sometimes have completely different subgame-perfect equilibria.
According to me, The question does not make sense. This is because Subgame-perfect equilibrium cannot be applied to simultaneous games as in a simultaneous move game there is only one sub game which is the original game itself so we cant apply SPE in a simultaneous move game.
The subgame perfect equilibria is a refinement of a Nash equilibrium used in dynamic games. A strategy profile is a subgame perfect equilibrium if it represents a Nash equilibrium of every subgame of the original game.