Question

In: Finance

As a financial would, you prefer to work with a single financial advisor or a team?...

As a financial would, you prefer to work with a single financial advisor or a team? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each option?

Solutions

Expert Solution

One advisor can not deliver the same level of service as a team of professional advisors; they simply do not have all the technical skills required to achieve the client's best outcome. Your CPA provides guidance on tax preparation and preparing tax returns; your solicitor assists with any variety of problems, like starting up a company, lawsuits, corporate succession, estate planning, or divorce; and your financial advisor leads the charge in helping you meet your financial objectives. A successful group of advisors will bounce off each other's ideas, work together like a well-trained team of cricket players and discover the best strategy to achieve the goals of their client. Hence, it is always better to work with a team of financial advisors.

Let us look at the advantages and disadvantages of each option:

Advantages of a single Financial Advisor:

1. Lesser cost of services.

2. There will be total accountability i.e. if the performance is not that great, we know whom to blame.

3. The relationship is more intimate. Since a single advisor provides advice on many aspects of your life, it makes sense to have a more personal relationship, because you are talking to one person only.

4. Sometimes the more basic client scenarios can benefit from one advisor who can truly handle it, rather than a team.

Disadvantages of a single Financial Advisor:

1. Single consultants do not provide comprehensive advice, simply because it is difficult to employ every planning aspect within a single company.

2. Single person tends to be "jacks of all trades, masters of none," as recruiting and affording the best minds within each specialization is difficult.

Note: Give it a thumbs up if it helps! Thanks in advance!


Related Solutions

Would you consider becoming a nonprofit manager or would you prefer to work in the for-profit...
Would you consider becoming a nonprofit manager or would you prefer to work in the for-profit sector? Why or why not? If you choose to work in the nonprofit sector, what are the non-monetary aspects of nonprofit work that drive you toward wanting to work in this field? If you choose the for-profit sector, why would you prefer to work in that field?
if given the choice, would you prefer to manage in an organization where an individual, team,...
if given the choice, would you prefer to manage in an organization where an individual, team, or group incentives were used? Why? What are the pros and cons of those types of incentives?
Erika would like to hire a financial advisor. The financial advisor that she has been considering...
Erika would like to hire a financial advisor. The financial advisor that she has been considering indicated that she would charge $2,500 to write a financial plan and 1% of any asset she manages. The financial advisor that Erika is considering is using what type of compensation model? A. Fee-offset. B. Fee-only. C. Commission. D. Fee-based.
as a farmer would you prefer to work on a mcdonaldized or non mcdonaldized farm?
as a farmer would you prefer to work on a mcdonaldized or non mcdonaldized farm?
would you prefer to work on a mcdonaldized far or a non mcdonaldized farm?
would you prefer to work on a mcdonaldized far or a non mcdonaldized farm?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of decentralization? Would you prefer to work in a centralized...
What are the advantages and disadvantages of decentralization? Would you prefer to work in a centralized or decentralized organization and why? What are opportunity costs and what are the economic benefits? Can you think of various industries that these types of costs and benefits could be applied?
Would you prefer to work for a leader with an autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire style? Are...
Would you prefer to work for a leader with an autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire style? Are there any conditions where autocratic leadership might be preferable and more efficient? Are there instances where laissez-faire leadership might be the appropriate style? Provide examples where appropriate.
Would you prefer a job that required you to work long hours but provided more days...
Would you prefer a job that required you to work long hours but provided more days off from work each week or a job that required fewer hours per day but also provided fewer days off? Why? Why not? Would your work environment affect this decision? If yes, how does it affect your decision? If no, why does it not affect your decision?
All else being equal, would you prefer to work in a tall or flat organization? Why?...
All else being equal, would you prefer to work in a tall or flat organization? Why? Which one do you think is best: a narrow span of control, or a wide span of control? How does the concept of span of control relate to tall/flat organizations? Justify your reasoning.
All else being equal, would you prefer to work in a tall or flat organization? Why?...
All else being equal, would you prefer to work in a tall or flat organization? Why? Which one do you think is best: a narrow span of control, or a wide span of control? How does the concept of span of control relate to tall/flat organizations? Justify your reasoning. 300 words
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT