Question

In: Accounting

Luke sold a building and the land on which the building sits to his wholly owned...

Luke sold a building and the land on which the building sits to his wholly owned corporation, Studemont Corp. at fair market value. The fair market value of the building was determined to be $502,500; Luke built the building several years ago at a cost of $375,000. Luke had claimed $56,500 of depreciation expense on the building. The fair market value of the land was determined to be $254,000 at the time of the sale; Luke purchased the land many years ago for $147,750.

a. What is the amount and character of Luke’s recognized gain or loss on the building?

b. What is the amount and character of Luke’s recognized gain or loss on the land?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aruna, a sole proprietor, wants to sell two assets that she no longer needs for her business. Both assets qualify as §1231 assets. The first is machinery and will generate a $16,250 §1231 loss on the sale. The second is land that will generate a $7,300 §1231 gain on the sale. Aruna’s ordinary marginal tax rate is 30 percent. (Input all amounts as positive values.)

a. Assuming she sells both assets in December of year 1 (the current year), what effect will the sales have on Aruna’s tax liability?

b. Assuming that Aruna sells the land in December of year 1 and the machinery in January of year 2, what effect will the sales have on Aruna’s tax liability for each year?
      

Solutions

Expert Solution

Question 1:

Part a:

Particulars

Amount ($)

Amount ($)

Sale proceeds from building

502500

Less: Adjusted cost of building

Cost of building

375000

Less: Depreciation

56500

318500

Long term capital gain (502500 - 318500)

184000

Thus, amount is $184,000 and the nature is capital gain.

Part b:

Market value of land

254000

Less: Purchase value of land

147750

Gain on appreciation of land value

106250

Thus, amount is $106,250 and the nature is appreciation in value of asset.

Question 2:

Tax liability of Aruna

Gain on sale of second land

7300

Less: Loss on sale of Machinery

16250

Net capital loss

-8950

Tax rate

30%

Reduction in tax liability (8950 x 30%)

2685

Year 1

Loss on sale of Machinery

16250

Tax rate

30%

Reduction in tax liability (16250 x 30%)

4875

Year 2

Gain on sale of land

7300

Tax rate

30%

Increase in tax liability (7300 x 30%)

2190


Related Solutions

Vadar owned Tatooine Farm. He sold the farm to Luke. Luke never recorded the deed. Vadar...
Vadar owned Tatooine Farm. He sold the farm to Luke. Luke never recorded the deed. Vadar stayed on the property as a tenant for two years. Near the end of the two years, Vadar learned that Luke had never recorded the deed. Vadar advertised Tatooine Farm for sale. Leia negotiated with Vadar for the purchase of the property thinking that Vadar was the owner. Leia also checked the records at the recording office and, finding no reason to question Vadar’s...
In January of 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary sold Equipment to the parent for a cash...
In January of 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary sold Equipment to the parent for a cash price of $122,500. The subsidiary had acquired the equipment at a cost of $140,000 and the estimated useful life when purchased was 10 years, and there was no salvage value. The subsidiary had depreciated the equipment for 4 years at the time of sale using the straight line method. The parent retained the depreciation policy of the subsidiary and depreciated the equipment over its...
Preparing the [I] consolidation entries for sale of land Assume that during 2015 a wholly owned...
Preparing the [I] consolidation entries for sale of land Assume that during 2015 a wholly owned subsidiary sells land that originally cost $450,000 to its parent for a sale price of $500,000. The parent holds the land until it sells the land to an unaffiliated company on December 31, 2019. The parent uses the equity method of pre-consolidation bookkeeping. a. Prepare the required [I] consolidation entry in 2015. Description Debit Credit [lgain] AnswerAccounts payableAccounts receivableAccumulated depreciationAPICCashCommon stockCost of goods soldDepreciation...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $189,000 but had a book value of only $115,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $310,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $101,300. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $330,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $330,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $297,000 but had a book value of only $181,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $430,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $140,900. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $171,000 but had a book value of only $104,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $470,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $154,100. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $225,000 but had a book value of only $137,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $350,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $114,500. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
Downstream Intercompany Land Transactions Saucony Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Puma Company, purchased a tract of...
Downstream Intercompany Land Transactions Saucony Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Puma Company, purchased a tract of land from Puma in 2019 for $5,000,000. Puma originally acquired the land for $2,000,000 and accounts for its investment in Saucony using the complete equity method. Required a. Assuming that Saucony still owns the land, give the working paper eliminations needed for the intercompany land sale when consolidated statements are prepared at the end of 2019 and 2020. Enter numerical answers using all zeros...
Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a...
Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression turbine to RebeckeTerwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000, payable as €2,000,000 on August 1 and €2,000,000 on November 1. Larkin derived its price quote of €4,000,000 on April 1 by dividing its normal U.S. dollar sales price of $4.320,000 by the then current spot rate of $1.0800/€. By the time the order was received and booked on May 1, the euro...
A Singaporean operation is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Australian company which regards the operation...
A Singaporean operation is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Australian company which regards the operation as a long term investment, and thus takes no part in the day to day decision making of the operation. The operation purchases parts from various Australian manufacturers for assembly by Singaporean labour. The finished product is exported to a number of countries but Singapore is still the major market. Consequently, sales price is dominated by competition within Singapore and follows the local regulations...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT