Question

In: Finance

Question 3 – Leasing Suppose Procter and Gamble (P&G) is considering purchasing $15 million new manufacturing...

Question 3 – Leasing

Suppose Procter and Gamble (P&G) is considering purchasing $15 million new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the equipment, it will depreciate it on a straight-line basis over the five years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1 million per year. Alternatively, it can lease the equipment for $4.2 million per year for the five years, in which case the lessor will provide necessary maintenance. Assume P&G’s tax rate is 35% and its borrowing cost is 7%.

Required:

  1. What is the NPV associated with leasing the equipment versus financing it with the lease equivalent loan?
  2. What is the break-even lease rate—that is, what lease amount could P&G pay each year and be indifferent between leasing and financing a purchase?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. If P&G buys the equipment, it will pay $15 million upfront, and have depreciation expenses of $3 million per year, generating a depreciation tax shield of $1.05 (35%*$3) million per year for year 1 to 5.

The company will also have after tax maintenance expense of $0.65 million [$1 x (1-0.35)] per year.

Therefore, the Free Cash Flows (FCF) from buying the equipment is 0.40 million $(1.05 - 0.65) per year from year 1 to 5.

On the other hand, if the company leases the equipment, the after tax lease payment will be $2.73 million [$4.2 x (1-0.35)] per year.

Hence, the Free Cash Flows (FCF) from leases vs buying will be as follows:

Year 0 = -$2.73-(-$15) = $12.27 million

Year 1 to Year 4 = $(-2.73-0.40) = -$3.13 million

Year 5 = $(0-0.40) = -$0.40 million

NPV (Lease vs Buying) = $733,955

Hence, Lease is more attractive than financing a purchase of equipment.

b. We can increase the after-tax lease payments by an amount with present value equal to the NPV in (a). Therefore,

Increase in lease will be 246,363. Therefore, the break-even lease rate is 4.2+0.246363 = $4.446363 million per year, as presented in the following excel format:

Buy Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Capex -15,000,000 0 0 0 0 0
After tax maintenance -650,000 -650,000 -650,000 -650,000 -650,000
Depreciation tax shield @ 35% 1050000 1050000 1050000 1050000 1050000
Free cash flow (Buy) -15,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
Lease
Lease payments -4,446,363 -4,446,363 -4,446,363 -4,446,363 -4,446,363 0
Income tax savings @ 35%             1,556,227          1,556,227          1,556,227          1,556,227          1,556,227 0
Free cash flow (Lease) -2,890,136 -2,890,136 -2,890,136 -2,890,136 -2,890,136 0
Lease vs Buy 12,109,864 -3,290,136 -3,290,136 -3,290,136 -3,290,136 -400,000
NPV $0

Related Solutions

Suppose Proctor? & Gamble? (P&G) is considering purchasing $14 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it...
Suppose Proctor? & Gamble? (P&G) is considering purchasing $14 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the? equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a? straight-line basis over five? years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per? year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for $3.4 million per year for the five?...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $12 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $12 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$3.3 million per year for the five​...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 10 million in new manufacturing equipment. If...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 10 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $ 1.00 million per​ year paid in each of the years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$2.6 million per year...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 18$18 million in new manufacturing equipment. If...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 18$18 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $ 1.00$1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$4.54.5 million per year for...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $17million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $17million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for $ 4.2 million per year for the five​...
In this examination, the company that I have selected is P&G which is Procter & Gamble....
In this examination, the company that I have selected is P&G which is Procter & Gamble. This company has a total rating of 2.7 out of 5 and has a ‘hold’ recommendation by the analysts covering this company. So, after analyzing the company’s annual report for the fiscal year 2018 (for the period ending June 30, 2018) I came across two significant information disclosures that support the hold rating by the analysts. These disclosures are: One, the company’s organic growth...
Reading: A. G. Lafley joined Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1977 as brand assistant for Joy...
Reading: A. G. Lafley joined Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1977 as brand assistant for Joy dishwashing liquid. From this beginning, he worked his way through the firm’s laun- dry division, becoming highly visible due to a number of successes including the launching of liquid Tide. A string of continuing accomplishments throughout the firm resulted in Lafley’s appointment as P&G’s CEO in June 2000, a post he held until retiring in mid-2009. Bob McDonald, who joined P&G in 1980, was...
The following is adapted from Financial Management for Executives (2nd ed.): Procter and Gamble (P&G) reports...
The following is adapted from Financial Management for Executives (2nd ed.): Procter and Gamble (P&G) reports the following information in a recent financial statement (the figures represent millions except for Earnings per share and Dividends per share). Use the below information to compute P&G’s sustainable growth rate for Years 2 and 3 and comment on P&G’s sustainable growth rate relative to its actual rate of growth. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Sales $56,741 $68,222 $83,503 Net income 8,684 10,340...
Like many other companies, Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) had to constantly alter its pricing strategies...
Like many other companies, Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) had to constantly alter its pricing strategies as it faced declining and shifting consumer demand for many of its products from 2009 to 2011. Although the recession that began in December 2007 officially ended in June 2009, P&G managers continued to face consumer cutbacks even on basic household staples. Rather than purchase P&G premium-priced brands, such as Tide detergent and Pampers diapers, consumers chose lessexpensive brands, including Gain detergent and Luvs...
Procter & Gamble has two divisions: Beauty/Grooming and Household Products. Suppose P&G’s debt-equity ratio is 0.19...
Procter & Gamble has two divisions: Beauty/Grooming and Household Products. Suppose P&G’s debt-equity ratio is 0.19 and its tax rate is 20%. The average beta for 27 firms in the Household Products sector is 0.98 with average debt-to-equity for those firms of 23.5%. The average beta for 14 firms in the Toiletries/Cosmetics sector is 1.17 with average debt-to-equity of those firms of 16.4%. Assume the average tax rate for each sector is 21%. If the risk-free rate is 4% and...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT