Question

In: Finance

Question 3 – Leasing Suppose Procter and Gamble (P&G) is considering purchasing $15 million new manufacturing...

Question 3 – Leasing

Suppose Procter and Gamble (P&G) is considering purchasing $15 million new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the equipment, it will depreciate it on a straight-line basis over the five years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1 million per year. Alternatively, it can lease the equipment for $4.2 million per year for the five years, in which case the lessor will provide necessary maintenance. Assume P&G’s tax rate is 35% and its borrowing cost is 7%.

Required:

  1. What is the NPV associated with leasing the equipment versus financing it with the lease equivalent loan?
  2. What is the break-even lease rate—that is, what lease amount could P&G pay each year and be indifferent between leasing and financing a purchase?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. If P&G buys the equipment, it will pay $15 million upfront, and have depreciation expenses of $3 million per year, generating a depreciation tax shield of $1.05 (35%*$3) million per year for year 1 to 5.

The company will also have after tax maintenance expense of $0.65 million [$1 x (1-0.35)] per year.

Therefore, the Free Cash Flows (FCF) from buying the equipment is 0.40 million $(1.05 - 0.65) per year from year 1 to 5.

On the other hand, if the company leases the equipment, the after tax lease payment will be $2.73 million [$4.2 x (1-0.35)] per year.

Hence, the Free Cash Flows (FCF) from leases vs buying will be as follows:

Year 0 = -$2.73-(-$15) = $12.27 million

Year 1 to Year 4 = $(-2.73-0.40) = -$3.13 million

Year 5 = $(0-0.40) = -$0.40 million

NPV (Lease vs Buying) = $733,955

Hence, Lease is more attractive than financing a purchase of equipment.

b. We can increase the after-tax lease payments by an amount with present value equal to the NPV in (a). Therefore,

Increase in lease will be 246,363. Therefore, the break-even lease rate is 4.2+0.246363 = $4.446363 million per year, as presented in the following excel format:

Buy Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Capex -15,000,000 0 0 0 0 0
After tax maintenance -650,000 -650,000 -650,000 -650,000 -650,000
Depreciation tax shield @ 35% 1050000 1050000 1050000 1050000 1050000
Free cash flow (Buy) -15,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
Lease
Lease payments -4,446,363 -4,446,363 -4,446,363 -4,446,363 -4,446,363 0
Income tax savings @ 35%             1,556,227          1,556,227          1,556,227          1,556,227          1,556,227 0
Free cash flow (Lease) -2,890,136 -2,890,136 -2,890,136 -2,890,136 -2,890,136 0
Lease vs Buy 12,109,864 -3,290,136 -3,290,136 -3,290,136 -3,290,136 -400,000
NPV $0

Related Solutions

Suppose Proctor? & Gamble? (P&G) is considering purchasing $14 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it...
Suppose Proctor? & Gamble? (P&G) is considering purchasing $14 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the? equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a? straight-line basis over five? years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per? year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for $3.4 million per year for the five?...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $12 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $12 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$3.3 million per year for the five​...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 10 million in new manufacturing equipment. If...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 10 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $ 1.00 million per​ year paid in each of the years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$2.6 million per year...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 18$18 million in new manufacturing equipment. If...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 18$18 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $ 1.00$1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$4.54.5 million per year for...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $17million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $17million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for $ 4.2 million per year for the five​...
Procter & Gamble Embraces Continuous Planning and Execution The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an...
Procter & Gamble Embraces Continuous Planning and Execution The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health/consumer health, and personal care and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its...
Competitive Profile Matrix of Procter & Gamble ( P & G)
Competitive Profile Matrix of Procter & Gamble ( P & G)
In this examination, the company that I have selected is P&G which is Procter & Gamble....
In this examination, the company that I have selected is P&G which is Procter & Gamble. This company has a total rating of 2.7 out of 5 and has a ‘hold’ recommendation by the analysts covering this company. So, after analyzing the company’s annual report for the fiscal year 2018 (for the period ending June 30, 2018) I came across two significant information disclosures that support the hold rating by the analysts. These disclosures are: One, the company’s organic growth...
Reading: A. G. Lafley joined Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1977 as brand assistant for Joy...
Reading: A. G. Lafley joined Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1977 as brand assistant for Joy dishwashing liquid. From this beginning, he worked his way through the firm’s laun- dry division, becoming highly visible due to a number of successes including the launching of liquid Tide. A string of continuing accomplishments throughout the firm resulted in Lafley’s appointment as P&G’s CEO in June 2000, a post he held until retiring in mid-2009. Bob McDonald, who joined P&G in 1980, was...
The following is adapted from Financial Management for Executives (2nd ed.): Procter and Gamble (P&G) reports...
The following is adapted from Financial Management for Executives (2nd ed.): Procter and Gamble (P&G) reports the following information in a recent financial statement (the figures represent millions except for Earnings per share and Dividends per share). Use the below information to compute P&G’s sustainable growth rate for Years 2 and 3 and comment on P&G’s sustainable growth rate relative to its actual rate of growth. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Sales $56,741 $68,222 $83,503 Net income 8,684 10,340...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT