In: Finance
The following is adapted from Financial Management for Executives (2nd ed.): Procter and Gamble (P&G) reports the following information in a recent financial statement (the figures represent millions except for Earnings per share and Dividends per share). Use the below information to compute P&G’s sustainable growth rate for Years 2 and 3 and comment on P&G’s sustainable growth rate relative to its actual rate of growth.
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
|
Sales |
$56,741 |
$68,222 |
$83,503 |
Net income |
8,684 |
10,340 |
12,075 |
Shareholders’ equity |
62,908 |
66,760 |
69,494 |
Earnings per share |
2.79 |
3.22 |
3.86 |
Dividends per share |
1.15 |
1.28 |
1.45 |
Sustainable growth rate (SSGR) = Return on equity * (1- dividend payout ratio)
Basically,SSGR is the growth rate that you can expect a firm to grow without additional financing
Units in $
For year 1:
Return on equity = net income / equity = 8684/62908 = 13.80%
Dividend payout ratio = Dividend per share / earnings per share = 1.15/2.79=0.41
Sustainable growth rate = Return on equity * (1- dividend payout ratio) = 13.80% * (1-0.41) = 8.14%
This is the sustainable rate of growth that you can expect in the next year ( year 2) . But actual growth rate in net income is
(10,340 - 8684)/8684 = 19.07% which is far higher than the SSGR.
For year 2:
Return on equity = net income / equity = 10340/66760 = 15.49%
Dividend payout ratio = Dividend per share / earnings per share = 1.28/3.22=0.40
Sustainable growth rate = Return on equity * (1- dividend payout ratio) = 15.49% * (1-0.40) = 9.29%
This is the sustainable rate of growth that you can expect in the next year ( year 2) . But actual growth rate in net income is
(12075-10,340)/10340 = 16.78% which is far higher than the SSGR.