In: Finance
The following is adapted from Financial Management for Executives (2nd ed.): Procter and Gamble (P&G) reports the following information in a recent financial statement (the figures represent millions except for Earnings per share and Dividends per share). Use the below information to compute P&G’s sustainable growth rate for Years 2 and 3 and comment on P&G’s sustainable growth rate relative to its actual rate of growth.
| 
 Year 1  | 
 Year 2  | 
 Year 3  | 
|
| 
 Sales  | 
 $56,741  | 
 $68,222  | 
 $83,503  | 
| 
 Net income  | 
 8,684  | 
 10,340  | 
 12,075  | 
| 
 Shareholders’ equity  | 
 62,908  | 
 66,760  | 
 69,494  | 
| 
 Earnings per share  | 
 2.79  | 
 3.22  | 
 3.86  | 
| 
 Dividends per share  | 
 1.15  | 
 1.28  | 
 1.45  | 
Sustainable growth rate (SSGR) = Return on equity * (1- dividend payout ratio)
Basically,SSGR is the growth rate that you can expect a firm to grow without additional financing
Units in $
For year 1:
Return on equity = net income / equity = 8684/62908 = 13.80%
Dividend payout ratio = Dividend per share / earnings per share = 1.15/2.79=0.41
Sustainable growth rate = Return on equity * (1- dividend payout ratio) = 13.80% * (1-0.41) = 8.14%
This is the sustainable rate of growth that you can expect in the next year ( year 2) . But actual growth rate in net income is
(10,340 - 8684)/8684 = 19.07% which is far higher than the SSGR.
For year 2:
Return on equity = net income / equity = 10340/66760 = 15.49%
Dividend payout ratio = Dividend per share / earnings per share = 1.28/3.22=0.40
Sustainable growth rate = Return on equity * (1- dividend payout ratio) = 15.49% * (1-0.40) = 9.29%
This is the sustainable rate of growth that you can expect in the next year ( year 2) . But actual growth rate in net income is
(12075-10,340)/10340 = 16.78% which is far higher than the SSGR.