Ionization energy is an inconsistent trend. For instance, the ionization energy of oxygen is lower than...

Ionization energy is an inconsistent trend. For instance, the ionization energy of oxygen is lower than that of nitrogen and the ionization energy gallium is less than that for zinc. Suggest reasons this occurs and indicate other regions on the periodic table that this may occur.

Expert Solution

queen_honey_blossom answered 1 year ago

Why is the first ionization energy lower than the third ionization energy

1A. The periodic trend for ionization energy states that typically ionization energy increases to the [left, right] across a period.

Complete the following sentence by selecting the appropriate choices.1A. The periodic trend for ionization energy states that typically ionization energy increases to the [left, right] across a period. This is because as effective nuclear charge increases to the [right, left] across a period, the [valence electrons, core electrons] experience a stronger attraction to the [valence electrons, core electrons, nucleus] and therefore require more energy to be removed.Complete the following statement for magnesium and aluminum.1B. Contrary to the periodic trend, the...

1. the first ionization energy of Ca is greater than the first ionization energy of K,...

1. the first ionization energy of Ca is greater than the first ionization energy of K, but the second ionization of Canis lower than the second ionization energy of K. Explain. 2. Compare the hybridization of the sulfur atom in the molecules SF_2, SF_4, and SF_6 3. Assign formal charges to each atom in NH_4^+, SO_3^-2, and XeF_2

EXPLAIN the general trend (from left to right) and anomalies observed on the ionization energy of...

EXPLAIN the general trend (from left to right) and anomalies observed on the ionization energy of the second period elements in the periodic table. The ionization energy for elements in the second period (Li to Ne) generally increases from left to right, but it decreases slightly from beryllium (899 kJ) to boron (800 kJ) and from nitrogen (1402 kJ) to oxygen (1314 kJ). Explain the general trend of increasing ionization energy from left to right and the minor decrease from...

Why is ionization energy (W) roughly two to three times greater than ionization potential (I)?

The ionization energy of a certain element is 352 kJ/mol. (Ionization energy is the minimum energy...

The ionization energy of a certain element is 352 kJ/mol. (Ionization energy is the minimum energy required to remove an electron from an atom. It is usually expressed in units of kJ/mol; that is, it is the energy in kilojoules required to remove one mole of electrons from one mole of atoms.) However, when the atoms of this element are in the first excited state, the ionization energy is only 166 kJ/mol. Based on this information, calculate the wavelength of...

The partial pressure of oxygen in the lung alveoli is a bit lower than in ambient...

The partial pressure of oxygen in the lung alveoli is a bit lower than in ambient air, being about 100 mm of mercury, or 0.13 Atm (it is lower than the partial pressure in air mainly because oxygen is continually taken up by the alveolar capillaries and carbon dioxide is continually released into the alveoli). In cell-free blood plasma (or a saline solution formulated to match key characteristics of blood plasma), which lacks red blood cells and therefore lacks hemoglobin, the...

#4: Why are the following true? A. The first ionization energy of Se is less than...

#4: Why are the following true? A. The first ionization energy of Se is less than the 1st IE of As B. The very negative electron affinity makes fluorine extremely reactive. C. More energy is released upon adding an electron to Br than upon adding one to Se D. Xenon has a high IE but is unreactive. Iodine also has a high IE but is quite reactive, unlike Xe. Thanks!

4. Explain why the energy efficiency in the case of ideal quenching is lower than energy...

4. Explain why the energy efficiency in the case of ideal quenching is lower than energy efficiency in the regime of super-ideal quenching?

Why is the 2nd Ionization Energy greater than the 1st when it comes to removing successive...

Why is the 2nd Ionization Energy greater than the 1st when it comes to removing successive valence electrons when you haven't changed the shielding/number of core electrons. For example, why does it take more energy to remove a 2nd valence electron from say Flourine, even though the number of core electrons (2) hasn't changed at all? Shouldn't that 2nd valence electron still be feeling the same effective nuclear charge from the nucleus?

Question