Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Proctor & Gamble claims that at least half the bars of Ivory soap they produce are...

Proctor & Gamble claims that at least half the bars of Ivory soap they produce are 99.44% pure (or more pure) as advertised. Unilever, one of Proctor & Gamble's competitors, wishes to put this claim to the test. They sample the purity of 131 bars of Ivory soap. They find that 52 of them meet the 99.44% purity advertised. What type of test should be run? t-test of a mean z-test of a proportion The alternative hypothesis indicates a two-tailed test right-tailed test left-tailed test Calculate the p-value. Does Unilever have sufficient evidence to reject Proctor & Gamble's claim? No Yes

Solutions

Expert Solution

z-test of a proportion.

The alternative hypothesis indicates a left-tailed test.

p = 52/131 = 0.4

The test statistic z = (p - P)/sqrt(P(1 - P)/n)

                              = (0.4 - 0.5)sqrt(0.5 * 0.5/131)

                              = -0.004

P-value = P(Z < -0.004)

             = 0.4980

At 5% significance level as the P-value is greater than the significance level (0.4980 > 0.05), we should not reject the null hypothesis.

No Unilever does not have sufficient evidence to reject Proctor and Gamble's claim.


Related Solutions

Proctor & Gamble claims that at least half the bars of Ivory soap they produce are...
Proctor & Gamble claims that at least half the bars of Ivory soap they produce are 99.44% pure (or more pure) as advertised. Unilever, one of Proctor & Gamble's competitors, wishes to put this claim to the test. They sample the purity of 145 bars of Ivory soap. They find that 62 of them meet the 99.44% purity advertised. What is the P Value?
In your textbook, read mini-case A Change at the Top at Proctor & Gamble: An Indication...
In your textbook, read mini-case A Change at the Top at Proctor & Gamble: An Indication of How Much the CEO Matters? in order to answer the questions below. (A-G) What makes a CEO’s job so complex? Use the mini-case to provide examples that help support your answer. A. G. Lafley joined Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1977 as brand assistant for Joy dishwashing liquid. From this beginning, he worked his way through the firm’s laundry division, becoming highly visible...
You are working as a cost accountant of Proctor and Gamble company’s detergents manufacturing division. Currently...
You are working as a cost accountant of Proctor and Gamble company’s detergents manufacturing division. Currently the demand of Ariel is 550 units a month. The company is selling one Ariel package at a price of 100. The variable cost of ne unit is 62 and fixed cost is 15000. The company is planning to design a new sales promotional campaign that will cost the company 7000 extra. The company is forecasting that by starting new sales promotional campaign company’s...
RWP #3 – Taxes Obtain to the most recent 10-K's for Proctor & Gamble Co and...
RWP #3 – Taxes Obtain to the most recent 10-K's for Proctor & Gamble Co and Coca Cola Co and complete the table below for the most recent fiscal year end: P&G Coke 1 Total Income Taxes on Continuing Operations per IS 2 Accrued Income Taxes (Taxes Payable) per BS, if listed 3 Total DTA per BS, if listed 4 Total DTL per BS, if listed 5 Total Valuation Allowances 6 Statutory Tax Rate 7 Effective Tax Rate
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $17million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $17million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for $ 4.2 million per year for the five​...
Suppose Proctor? & Gamble? (P&G) is considering purchasing $14 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it...
Suppose Proctor? & Gamble? (P&G) is considering purchasing $14 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the? equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a? straight-line basis over five? years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per? year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for $3.4 million per year for the five?...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $12 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it...
Suppose Proctor​ & Gamble​ (P&G) is considering purchasing $12 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the​ equipment, it will depreciate it for tax purposes on a​ straight-line basis over five​ years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.00 million per​ year, paid in each of years 1 through 5. It can also lease the equipment under a true tax lease for ​$3.3 million per year for the five​...
(I used proctor and gamble), (P&G) So, analyze the Statement of “Retained Earnings” for this company. Next,...
(I used proctor and gamble), (P&G) So, analyze the Statement of “Retained Earnings” for this company. Next, discuss any additions or subtractions recorded for the period from the perspective of a financial analyst. Be sure to discuss what you found interesting about these additions or subtractions
The process that produces Sonora Bars (a type of candy) is intended to produce bars with...
The process that produces Sonora Bars (a type of candy) is intended to produce bars with a mean weight of 56 gm. The process standard deviation is known to be 0.77 gm. A random sample of 49 candy bars yields a mean weight of 55.82 gm. Find the p-value for a test to see whether the candy bars are smaller than they are supposed to be? Please explain why this is a t or z test and show the p...
Collusion: Exploitation or benefit? In 2011, two soap and detergent firms, Unilever and Procter & Gamble,...
Collusion: Exploitation or benefit? In 2011, two soap and detergent firms, Unilever and Procter & Gamble, were fined a total of €315m (US$ 220m) for fixing the price of washing powder in eight European countries. Procter & Gamble is the world’s largest consumer products company. The two firms had colluded over prices for more than three years. The collusion began when they agreed to implement an industry-wide programme to improve their environmental impact by obtaining their raw materials from sustainable...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT