Question

In: Finance

Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...

Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The study period is 30 years and the​ firm's MARR is 10​% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 10​% per year.

a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative​ 1?

b. What is the annual worth of Alternative​ 2?

c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Alternative​ 1?

d. Which alternative should be selected​?

Alt. 1   Alt. 2   Alt. 3
Capital Investment -30,000   -60,000   -40,000
Annual Costs -14,000   -34,000   -27,000
Annual Revenues 27,000   55,500   36,000
Market Value at End of Useful Life   9,000   9,000   9,000
Useful Life, years 5 5 6
IRR 36.5%   25.6%   13.2%

Solutions

Expert Solution

a Payback Alt 1 2.31
b NPV of Alt 2 67367.83
Annual worth of Alt 2 $7,146.33
c IRR of incremental cash flow 12.86%
d NPV of Alt 1 61842.94
NPV of Alt 2 67367.83
NPV of Alt 3 9258.84

Select Alt 2 since it has the highest NPV.

Cash flows are as below

Year Alt 1 Cumulative CF Alt 2 Alt 3 IncrementalCF- 2/1
0 -30000 -30000 -60000 -40000 -30000
1 13000 -17000 21500 9000 8500
2 13000 -4000 21500 9000 8500
3 13000 9000 21500 9000 8500
4 13000 22000 21500 9000 8500
5 -8000 14000 -29500 9000 -21500
6 13000 27000 21500 -22000 8500
7 13000 40000 21500 9000 8500
8 13000 53000 21500 9000 8500
9 13000 66000 21500 9000 8500
10 -8000 58000 -29500 9000 -21500
11 13000 71000 21500 9000 8500
12 13000 84000 21500 -22000 8500
13 13000 97000 21500 9000 8500
14 13000 110000 21500 9000 8500
15 -8000 102000 -29500 9000 -21500
16 13000 115000 21500 9000 8500
17 13000 128000 21500 9000 8500
18 13000 141000 21500 -22000 8500
19 13000 154000 21500 9000 8500
20 -8000 146000 -29500 9000 -21500
21 13000 159000 21500 9000 8500
22 13000 172000 21500 9000 8500
23 13000 185000 21500 9000 8500
24 13000 198000 21500 -22000 8500
25 -8000 190000 -29500 9000 -21500
26 13000 203000 21500 9000 8500
27 13000 216000 21500 9000 8500
28 13000 229000 21500 9000 8500
29 13000 242000 21500 9000 8500
30 22000 264000 30500 18000 8500

WORKINGS


Related Solutions

Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The study period is 30 years and the​ firm's MARR is 17% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 17​% per year. a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative​ 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative​ 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Alternative​ 1?...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 12​% per year. At the end of the useful​ life, the investment will be sold. A​ decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. X Y Z Investment cost ​$275,000 ​$140,000 ​$370,000 Annual revenue ​$85,840 ​$53,207 ​$93,911 Annual cost ​$23,183 ​$14,370 ​$20,543 Useful life 15 years...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. A decision maker must select one of these alternatives. A B Investment cost $50,000 $30,000 Annual Revenue 15,000 10,000 Salvage value 5,000 3,000 Useful life (yrs.) 5 5 For all parts below, do not convert from another form of equivalent worth; e.g., AW→FW. 1. Compute the AW for Alt A. Based on this measure, should the...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. Which alternative would you select?
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. Which alternative would you select?
1. Three mutually exclusive projects are being considered. The cash flows for each and corresponding rate...
1. Three mutually exclusive projects are being considered. The cash flows for each and corresponding rate of return are list below. MARR = 8% can any project eliminated? Using functional notation to solve for the incremental rate of return. 1 2 3 0 -20000 -25000 -29000 1 2000 2500 3000 2 5000 6200 7000 3 8000 9900 11000 4 11000 13600 15000 ROR 9% 8.7% 7.4% 2. Which project must you choose based on the information provided below using conventional...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives being considered.  One of the three must be selected, so this...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives being considered.  One of the three must be selected, so this is a set of three cost alternatives.  MARR is 15% and the life of each project is 12 years.  These projects are: Project I Capital Cost: $130,000 Revenue/Savings: 22,000 Expense/Cost: $12,000 Salvage: $25,000 Project II Capital Cost: $100,000 Revenue/Savings: $10,000 Expense/Cost: $15,000 Salvage: $20,000 Project III Capital Cost: $160,000 Revenue/Savings: $10,000 Expense/Cost: $20,000 Salvage: $40,000 please solve asap, thank you!
Three (3) mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the production equipment at a toilet tissue...
Three (3) mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the production equipment at a toilet tissue paper factory. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given here. (All cash flows are in thousands.). Use the EUAW (Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth) method to determine which equipment alternative, if any should be selected? The firm’s MARR is 18%. Cash flow diagrams must be included. A B C Capital investment 2000 4200 7000 Annual revenues 3200 6000 8000 Annual costs 2100 4000...
A company has the following mutually exclusive investment alternatives. The cash flows are shown below. Year...
A company has the following mutually exclusive investment alternatives. The cash flows are shown below. Year Project A Project B 0 -$1,000 -$1,000 1 600 300 2 600 600 3 600 900 If the cost of capital is 10%, which investment(s) should the company select? Both Project A and Project B Project B with a NPV of $444.78 Project B with a NPV of $276.31 Project A with a NPV of $493.11 Project A with a NPV of $253.64
Two projects being considered are mutually exclusive and have the following cash flows: Year Project A...
Two projects being considered are mutually exclusive and have the following cash flows: Year Project A Project B 0 -$50,000 -$50,000 1    15,000 0 2    15,000 0 3    15,000 0 4    15,000 0 5    15,000 90,000 1) Calculate NPV of each project if the required rate of return on these projects is 8 percent. 2) which would be chosen and why?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT