Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying...

A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying data​ table, the distribution shows the proportion of fatalities by location of injury for motorcycle accidents. The second data table shows the location of injury and fatalities for 2051  riders not wearing a helmet. Complete parts (a) and (b) below.

Location of injury Multiple locations  Head Neck Thorax Abdomen/ Lumbar/ Spine

Proportion 0.570 0.310   0.030 0.060 0.030   

Location of injury Multiple locations  Head Neck Thorax Abdomen/ Lumbar/ Spine

Number 1029 857 36 82 47

a) Does the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follow the distribution for all​ riders? Use a = 0.10 level of significance. What are the null and alternative​hypotheses?

A. H0​: The distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follows the same distribution for all other riders.

    H1​: The distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does not follow the same distribution for all other riders.

B. H0​: The distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does not follow the same distribution for all other riders.

    H1​: The distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does follow the same distribution for all other riders.

C. None of these.

Location of Injury         Observed Count    Expected Count

Multiple Locations 1029 ?

Head 857 ?

Neck 36   ?

Thorax 82 ?

Abdomen/lumbar/                  47                          ?

    spine

(round to 2 decimal places as needed)

What is the p value of the test?

P value = __ (Round to 3 decimal places as needed)

Based on the​ results, does the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follow the distribution for all other riders at a significance level of a = 0.01?

A. Do not reject Upper H 0. There is sufficient evidence that the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follows the distribution for all riders.

B. Reject Upper H 0. There is sufficient evidence that the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does not follow the distribution for all riders.

C. Reject Upper H 0. There is not sufficient evidence that the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follows the distribution for all riders.

D. Do not reject Upper H 0. There is not sufficient evidence that the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does not follow the distribution for all riders

(b) Compare the observed and expected counts for each category. What does this information tell​ you?

A. Motorcycle fatalities from head injuries occur less frequently for riders not wearing a helmet.

B. Motorcycle fatalities from head injuries occur more frequently for riders not wearing a helmet.

C. Motorcycle fatalities from thorax injuries occur more frequently for riders not wearing a helmet

  

Solutions

Expert Solution

a) Null and alternative​hypotheses:

A. H0​: The distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follows the same distribution for all other riders.

H1​: The distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does not follow the same distribution for all other riders.

Category Observed (O) Proportion, p Expected Frequency (E) (O-E)²/E
1 1029 0.57 2051 * 0.57 = 1169.07 (1029 - 1169.07)²/1169.07 = 16.7822
2 857 0.31 2051 * 0.31 = 635.81 (857 - 635.81)²/635.81 = 76.9491
3 36 0.03 2051 * 0.03 = 61.53 (36 - 61.53)²/61.53 = 10.5929
4 82 0.06 2051 * 0.06 = 123.06 (82 - 123.06)²/123.06 = 13.7
5 47 0.03 2051 * 0.03 = 61.53 (47 - 61.53)²/61.53 = 3.4312
Total 2051 1.00 2051 121.4554

Test statistic:

χ² = ∑ ((O-E)²/E) = 121.46

df = n-1 = 4

p-value = CHISQ.DIST.RT(121.4554, 4) = 0.00

Conclusion:

B. Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence that the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet does not follow the distribution for all riders.

b)

B. Motorcycle fatalities from head injuries occur more frequently for riders not wearing a helmet.


Related Solutions

A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying data​ table, the distribution shows the proportion of fatalities by location of injury for motorcycle accidents. The second data table shows the location of injury and fatalities for 2061 riders not wearing a helmet. Location of Injury   Probability    Injuries/fatalities not wearing helmet Multiple Locations   0.570   1030 Head   0.310   863 Neck   0.030   40 Thorax   0.060   82 Abdomen/Lumbar/Spine   0.030   46 (a) Does the distribution of...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying data​ table, the distribution shows the proportion of fatalities by location of injury for motorcycle accidents. The second data table shows the location of injury and fatalities for 2083 riders not wearing a helmet. Complete parts​ (a) and​ (b) below. a) Does the distribution of fatal injuries for riders not wearing a helmet follow the distribution for all​ riders? Use alpha equals=0.01 level of...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying data​ table, the distribution shows the proportion of fatalities by location of injury for motorcycle accidents. The second data table shows the location of injury and fatalities for 2051  riders not wearing a helmet. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Location of injury Multiple locations  Head Neck Thorax Abdomen/ Lumbar/ Spine Proportion 0.570 0.310   0.030 0.060 0.030    Location of injury Multiple locations  Head Neck Thorax Abdomen/...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying...
A traffic safety company publishes reports about motorcycle fatalities and helmet use. In the first accompanying data​ table, the distribution shows the proportion of fatalities by location of injury for motorcycle accidents. The second data table shows the location of injury and fatalities for 2068 riders not wearing a helmet. Location of Injury   Probability   Frequency Multiple Locations   0.570   1027 Head   0.310   869 Neck   0.030   40 Thorax   0.060   83 Abdomen/Lumbar/Spine   0.030   49 ​(a) Does the distribution of fatal injuries for riders...
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reports the percentage of traffic accidents occurring each day of...
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reports the percentage of traffic accidents occurring each day of the week. Assume that a sample of 420 accidents provided the following date. Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 66 50 53 47 55 69 80 420 Conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether the proportion of traffic accidents is the same for each day of the week. Using a .05 level of significance, what is your conclusion? 1. Which is the...
Use the accompanying paired data consisting of registered boats​ (tens of​ thousands) and manatee fatalities from...
Use the accompanying paired data consisting of registered boats​ (tens of​ thousands) and manatee fatalities from boat encounters. Let x represent the number of registered boats and let y represent the corresponding number of manatee deaths. Use the given number of registered boats and the given confidence level to construct a prediction interval estimate of manatee deaths. Use x equals =83 ​(for 830,000 registered​ boats) with a 99​% confidence level. Boats (tens of thousands)   Manatees 66   55 67   39 66  ...
Use the accompanying paired data consisting of registered boats? (tens of? thousands) and manatee fatalities from...
Use the accompanying paired data consisting of registered boats? (tens of? thousands) and manatee fatalities from boat encounters. Let x represent the number of registered boats and let y represent the corresponding number of manatee deaths. Use the given number of registered boats and the given confidence level to construct a prediction interval estimate of manatee deaths. Use = 87 (for 87?0,000 registered? boats) with a 99?% confidence level. Find the indicated prediction interval. __ manatees < y < __...
Use the accompanying paired data consisting of registered boats​ (tens of​ thousands) and manatee fatalities from...
Use the accompanying paired data consisting of registered boats​ (tens of​ thousands) and manatee fatalities from boat encounters. Let x represent the number of registered boats and let y represent the corresponding number of manatee deaths. Use the given number of registered boats and the given confidence level to construct a prediction interval estimate of manatee deaths. Use x=89 (for 89​0,000 registered​ boats) with a 99​% confidence level. Boats (tens of thousands)   Manatees 67    54 68    37 66...
Head-First Company now sells both bicycle helmets and motorcycle helmets. Next year, Head- First expects to...
Head-First Company now sells both bicycle helmets and motorcycle helmets. Next year, Head- First expects to produce total revenue of $585,000 and incur total variable cost of $372,000. Total fixed cost is expected to be $60,000. Required: 1. Calculate the break-even point in sales dollars for Head-First. Round the contribution margin ratio to four decimal places and sales to the nearest dollar. 2. Check your answer by preparing a contribution margin income statement. Required: 1. Calculate the break-even point in...
The advocacy group the National Safety Council (NSC) reports that cell phone use while driving leads...
The advocacy group the National Safety Council (NSC) reports that cell phone use while driving leads to 1.6 million crashes each year and an astounding out of every 4 car accidents in the United States is caused by texting and driving. Hoping to show that their campaign to create awareness about the dangers of distracted driving is working and that less people are texting and driving, the advocacy group the National Safety Council (NSC) did a study of accidents that...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT