Question

1. Write a brief essay on the opportunity costs countries may face when repaying external debt, particularly when debt was accumulated for the wrong reasons.
2. Write a brief essay on how a typical IMF stand-by program or a typical World Bank structural adjustment loan contradict some or all of the basic objectives of “sustainability.”

Answer 1

1)External debt is the issue of a country's debt that is borrowed from foreign lenders, inclusive of industrial banks, governments, or global monetary institutions. These loans, including interest, ought to typically be paid in the foreign money in which the non-public mortgage used to be made. To earn the needed currency, the borrowing is of a May moreover promote and export gadgets to the lending country.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

External debt is the aspect of a country's debt that is borrowed from distant places lenders by using industrial banks, governments, or international financial institutions.

If a US of a can not repay its exterior debt, it faces a debt crisis.

If a kingdom fails to repay its exterior debt, it is referred to be in sovereign default.

External debt can take the shape of a tied loan, whereby the borrower ought to work out any spending of the bucks to the United States of the US that is offering the loan.

Understanding External Debt

A debt crisis can showcase up if an u. s. a. With a susceptible monetary machine is no longer in a role to repay the exterior debt due to an incapacity to produce and promote units and make a really useful return. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is one of the groups that continues tune of countries' exterior debt. The World Bank publishes a quarterly record on exterior debt statistics.

If a kingdom is unable or refuses to repay its exterior debt, it is cited to be in sovereign default. This can lead to the lenders withholding future releases of belongings that can additionally be favored by means of way of capability of the borrowing nation. Such cases can have a rolling effect. The borrower’s foreign cash may moreover in addition collapse, and the nation’s preferred economic boom will stall.

The stipulations of default can make it hard for a united state of the United States to repay what it owes plus any penalties the lender has introduced in opposition to the delinquent nation. Defaults and bankruptcies in the case of world areas are dealt with in some exceptional way than defaults and bankruptcies in the client market. It is possible that worldwide places that default on exterior debt may additionally moreover doubtlessly preserve away from having to repay it.

How External Debt Is Used with the useful resource of the Borrower

Sometimes referred to as overseas places debt, corporations, as properly as governments, can procure exterior debt. In many instances, exterior debt takes the structure of a tied loan, which workable the bucks secured through the financing have to be spent in the u. s. a. That is presenting the financing. For instance, the private loan might enable one country to buy sources it desires from the United States that furnished the loan.

External debt, mainly tied loans, may additionally be set for specific functions that are described by means of the use of the use of capability of the borrower and lender. Such economic useful resource ought to be used to address humanitarian or disaster needs. For example, if a kingdom faces intense famine and can't tightly close emergency foods with the aid of skill of its private resources, it would possibly use exterior debt to procure meals from the kingdom offering the tied loan. If a united states wishes to bring together up its electricity infrastructure, it would perchance leverage exterior debt as part of an agreement to purchase resources, such as the substances to acquire power vegetation in underserved areas.

2)

Historical context of IMF and World Bank critiques

Founded in 1944, the World Bank Group (WBG, or Bank) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF, or Fund) are twin intergovernmental organisations that are influential in shaping the shape of the world’s enchancment and financial order. Also acknowledged as the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWIs), they had been initially created with the intention of rebuilding the worldwide economic machine following World War II (WWII). The key choices principal to the institution of each corporations have been in the main entreated with the aid of the US, and to a lesser extent the UK, and at some stage in the post-war length the BWIs have been considerably influenced by means of the use of the US’s geopolitical strength. Their mandates, core of attention and programmes have evolved notably over time, as seen, for example, thru the shift of their pivotal role as designers of the consistent exchange rate regime created with the useful resource of the Bretton Woods System, to their lively merchandising of a fluctuating trade fee system after its crumple in 1973. Their functions are special in the World Bank’s and IMF’s respective Articles of Agreement (see also BWP, What are the Bretton Woods Institutions?)

While the institution of the Bank and Fund was once as an apolitical effort to rebuild the world financial gadget in the aftermath of WWII, some interpretations also view them as an effort to defend or make greater the obtain of western capitalism in the face of a workable assignment from the Soviet Union, and to promote US pursuits in particular. Under President Robert McNamara (1968-1981), the World Bank’s mission began to shift, as it developed a middle of attention on profits inequality and poverty for the first time.



John Maynard Keynes and Harry Dexter White at the inaugural meeting of the IMF’s Board of Governors in Savannah, Georgia, U.S., 1946

In the Nineteen Eighties and 1990s, the policies championed via capability of the BWIs had been motivated in precept by using potential of the so-called ‘Washington Consensus’, which centered ideologically on merchandising free-market monetary insurance policies such as deregulation, privatisation and alternate liberalisation, as well as focused on limitless monetary growth, and were applied specifically via Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs). As many authors have argued – including, for example, via demonstrating the hyperlinks between the decimation of African health systems via SAPS and the response to the 2014 Ebola disaster (see Observer Winter 2015) – the devastating influences of SAPs have been enduring and persist to this day.

While the BWIs have historically been considered as an instrument of United States and specific Western countries’ political and financial power, their role and relevance has been constantly debated. This debate has regained momentum in the decade given that the 2008 world economic crisis, where the upward push of China, frequently as the coming of a greater multipolar world, is seen via some as a challenge to the perceived hegemony of the BWIs. However, others have mentioned that this analytical framework is flawed, as the personal hobbies promoted through the Bank and Fund can't always be understood in this slight and there is a excessive diploma of cooperation between the Bank and Fund and unique multilateral institutions, together with these hooked up by means of way of China and special creating countries.

The greater huge monetary crises due to the fact the 1970s – and the 2008 catastrophe in precise – have had an impact on the work of the Fund, which has been compelled to pass by past truely u . s . huge interventions to a greater center of interest on the worldwide economy, and from scanning the horizon for possible crises to dealing with them in order to preserve away from regional or world contagion. The role of the Bank has additionally modified dramatically, from an preliminary middle of attention on infrastructure lending in its incarnation as the poster infant for the Washington Consensus and Post-Washington Consensus, to the “Knowledge Bank” the location it tried to function itself as the repository of ‘development expertise’.

Today, the work of the Bank is in modern times framed by way of using its twin goals, set up in 2013: “eliminating severe poverty with the aid of 2030 and boosting shared prosperity.” These are in particular targeted in precept through: direct lending for improvement projects; direct fee vary help to governments (also recounted as Development Policy Financing [DPF]); economic information to the personal sector, together with monetary intermediaries (FI); and by way of guarantees for large-scale development. The current referred to objectives of the Fund are promoting global fiscal and economic cooperation, securing worldwide monetary stability, facilitating international trade, and advertising and marketing excessive employment and sustainable economic growth. It interests to do so through imparting personal loan programmes to states with stability of repayments problems, as desirable as insurance advice through both technical help or bilateral and multilateral macroeconomic surveillance.

There is no question that the IMF and World Bank proceed to be amongst the most relevant and brilliant effective norm-setters, convenors, knowledge-holders and influencers of the global improvement and monetary landscape. This Inside the Institutions sets-out some of the most regularly occurring criticisms of the World Bank and IMF beneath three large lenses: democratic governance, human rights and the environment.

back to top

2.    Democratic governance

2.1 Structural under-representation of the Global South

One of the central criticisms of the World Bank and IMF relates to the political strength imbalances in their governance constructions where, as a end result of vote casting shares being based totally mostly on the dimension and ‘openness’ of countries’ economies, poorer international locations – often those receiving loans from the BWIs – are structurally under-represented in decision-making processes.

Despite the 2016 voting reforms at the Fund, which shifted vote casting powers especially (to the special reap of China), the distribution of vote casting strength stays severely imbalanced in favour of the US, European international locations and Japan, in particular. Importantly, the US still has veto power over an array of indispensable options (see Observer Winter 2018). In the case of the World Bank, in addition to calls for accelerated illustration of low-income nations on the Executive Board, civil society corporations (CSOs) have historically demanded reforms of decision-making thru the introduction of double-majority voting, the place an agreement would require every shareholder and member kingdom majorities, hence giving growing international areas a large function in these processes.

The under-representation of low- and middle-income international locations on the BWIs’ Executive Boards is exacerbated by the historical ‘gentleman’s agreement’ between the United States and European countries, which has considered the Fund and Bank led by way of a European and US national, respectively, thinking about their inception. Civil society has lengthy recognized as for this opaque system to be modified with a merit-based, transparent process. However, the April 2019 appointment of World Bank President David Malpass – a US country wide who ran unopposed for the Bank’s pinnacle job – confirmed that the gentleman’s agreement stays alive and well no be counted civil society opposition (see Observer Spring 2019).

2.2 Undermining democratic ownership

The bother of political strength imbalances is exacerbated with the resource of any different long-standing critique of the Bank and Fund: that the financial coverage stipulations they promote – regularly related or ‘recommended’ as segment of loans, projects, technical assistance, or economic surveillance – undermine the sovereignty of borrower nations, limiting their potential to make insurance alternatives and eroding their possession of national improvement strategies. This is mostly the case for the IMF as ‘a lender of closing resort’ for governments experiencing stability of charge problems.

While traditionally the IMF and Bank enforced conditionality in particular thru SAPs, today, the IMF requires a ‘letter of intent’ from governments inquiring for a loan. To be accepted via the IMF for a loan, the letter requires prior actions, quantitative general overall performance standards and structural benchmarks – the latter of which continues to encompass structural macroeconomic coverage reforms. Despite efforts to ‘streamline’ the range of stipulations in the face of intense criticism, the IMF’s 2018 Review of Program Design and Conditionality found that the vary of structural conditions is on the rise. Once again, this raises worries about the restriction of coverage residence for growing countries. For the World Bank, conditionality is now most at once issued by using its DPF, where loans and provides for improvement tasks are provided to nations which undertake the required ‘prior actions’ to acquire this fungible finance. In 2017, the Bank issued 434 prior actions, according to research by Belgium-based CSO Eurodad.

In addition to the formal conditions delivered thru lending programmes, each businesses play a larger nuanced position in limiting coverage house through their research, publications, coverage advice and training. Particularly for low-income countries that discover it hard to entice capital at decrease priced rates, IMF and Bank pronouncements on domestic insurance plan policies can lead to vital reactions by means of the usage of ‘the market’ (including viable lenders or investors), subsequently doubtlessly limiting (or increasing) countries’ financing options. The Bank and Fund’s bias towards fiscal consolidation, the personal region and debt servicing additionally restricts public coverage residence and the ability of governments to finance infrastructure and social offerings (see the ‘Human Rights’ section below). The Bank and Fund have hooked up massive normative strength via their research, publications, pronouncements and information of ‘independent’ tutorial work. Their functionality to feature their policy prescriptions as ‘best practice’, supported with the aid of way of ‘robust’ theoretical and empirical work, generally consequences in the internalisation of Bank and Fund positions via scholars, improvement practitioners and finance ministers.

2.3 Biased and inconsistent decision-making

The Bank and Fund have additionally been closely criticised for the feature performed by potential of the political expediency of necessary shareholders in its decision-making and desire of interventions, consisting of its support to dictatorships. The IMF’s choice to break its very very own rules and help the particularly controversial Greek mortgage programme, agreed in 2010, brought on Brazil’s Executive Director to the IMF to protest that, “… the software … may additionally be seen now not as a rescue of Greece, which will have to endure a wrenching adjustment, then again as a bail-out of Greece’s non-public debt holders, regularly European economic institutions.”

In general, the transition from the Washington Consensus, underpinned through way of the have trust in the efficiency of markets and consequently a extensively decreased position for the state, to its ‘more progressive’ post-Washington Consensus successor – which acknowledges market disasters and re-inserts the state’s relevance, is frequently added as a giant alternate in Bank and IMF questioning and their principles. However, the Bank’s emphasis on the utilization of public sources to leverage (subsidise) personal funding via its Maximising Finance for Development (MFD) technique demonstrates the state’s function has only been reframed sincerely to ‘create an enabling’ surroundings to allow the personal vicinity to pursue its objectives.

2.4 Weak capability to study from past mistakes

The IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) used to be once set up in 2001 to habits opinions of the policies and functionalities of the institution with the intention of enhancing the studying culture, strengthening credibility, and supporting institutional governance and oversight. On the World Bank side, the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) used to be created in 2006, integrating more than a few character accountability mechanisms, and is charged with evaluating the things to do of the complete World Bank Group and identifying what works, what doesn’t and why.

However, the Bank and Fund have been criticised for failing to enforce the pointers of the IEG and IEO, respectively. In the case of the Bank, this reflects giant criticisms of personnel incentives being misaligned with its twin goals, and the Bank having an insular, self-referential approach to records production, which – in accordance to the landmark Deaton Report published in 2006 – now and again borders on ‘parody’ (see Observer Summer 2018). Meanwhile, a 1/3 independent comparison of the IEO itself, posted in 2018, discovered that the IEO’s hints proceed to “lack traction” within the Fund (see Observer Autumn 2018). This echoes the findings of previous reviews of the IEO, amidst accusations of ‘groupthink’ at the IMF, which the IEO deemed partly the cause of the Fund now not foreseeing the 2008 international monetary crisis, arguably its most quintessential job and clearest trendy failure (see Update Issue 74).

2.5 Effective impunity for harms caused

In the 1980s, the Bank used to be once beset thru a string of controversies related to environmental and social affects of Bank-financed tasks (see Human rights and Environment section below), with the Sardar Sarovar dam mission in India – which sparked a international opposition campaign – leading to the group of the Bank’s Inspection Panel (its impartial accountability mechanism [IAM]) in 1993 (see Observer Autumn 2017). A separate IAM for the International Finance Corporation (IFC) – the personal quarter arm of the World Bank – the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), was once created in 1999. These accountability mechanisms had been set up to hear complaints of people and communities affected by way of the usage of Bank and IFC-funded projects, and to foster redress the place relevant. While the Bank’s IAMs are generally considered to be ‘best of class’ amongst IFIs, their mandates are limited, their remedy mechanisms for those negatively impacted by way of way of Bank initiatives proceed to lack, and administration responses to their findings are often inadequate.

Relatedly, a 2019 US Supreme Court decision found in favour of Indian fisherfolk, and in the direction of the IFC, rejecting its declare to ‘absolute immunity’ from prosecution in US courts; the plaintiffs took the IFC to court docket in the US after failing to collect sufficient compensation following a CAO investigation ruling that IFC’s funding in the Tata Mundra electricity plant in India had resulted in substantial damage to their livelihoods. Despite the Supreme Court decision, the vast share of the Bank’s lending and exclusive programme portfolios continue to be immune from criminal action, as does the IMF.

Finally, critics also argue that the opaque nature of investments in FI (i.e. industrial banks and asset funds) with the aid of the IFC – which constitutes a creating phase of its portfolio – and its incapability to display screen and display FI sub-projects adequately, undermines accountability. The lack of public disclosure of FI investments makes it difficult for communities and civil society to carry instances to the CAO and keep the IFC guilty for its actions (see Observer Winter 2017).

back to top

3.    Human rights

A 2nd cross of longstanding evaluations has situated on the content of the policies, programmes and initiatives that the BWIs promote and put in pressure and how they have undermined a huge spectrum of human rights, with the Bank even being labelled a “human rights-free zone” in 2015 with the aid of the UN Special Rapporteur on intense poverty and human rights.

3.1 Restricting the macroeconomic environment for human rights

At the macroeconomic level, following on from the proper Washington Consensus, the Bank and IMF proceed to push a specific set of macroeconomic policy prescriptions all through nearly all their member countries. Most typically, these are fiscal consolidation measures (or austerity), and consist of decreasing the public wage bill, introducing or growing VAT and different indirect regressive taxes in particular, labour flexibilisation, rationalising (cutting) and privatising social services, and focused on social protections and subsidies, at the same time as keeping low tiers of inflation, corporate taxation prices and change tariffs.

In particular, in the aftermath of the 2008 monetary crisis, this ‘pro-cyclical’ method used to be criticised for leading to a decline in monetary activity, principal to minimize consumption, reduce public revenues, decrease funding in quintessential public services, and higher levels of inequality, which in turn additionally lowers growth. Critics have also once more and once more pointed out this strategy does now now not address the root reasons of the government’s balance of repayments distress (see Observer Winter 2017-18). While the IMF has softened its function on some quintessential issues, such as the focus that capital controls may additionally be quintessential in fine (limited) circumstances, and the extended acknowledgement of the possible advantages of anti-cyclical policies (also in very restrained circumstances), the commonplace course of journey remains normally unchanged.



Danger: Violations Ahead. International Accountability Project

Labour unions, for instance, have lengthy antagonistic the BWIs’ systematic weakening of labour rights either besides prolong through conditionality or circuitously by means of coverage recommendation in flagship reviews and surveillance, such as the IMF’s 2017 mortgage programme to Greece (see Observer Autumn 2017), or the World Bank’s 2018 World Development Report (see Observer Winter 2018), respectively. Other financial and social rights, such as the right to social security, fitness and education, as properly as the broader proper to an enough substantial of living, consisting of adequate food, garb and housing, are all undermined through the BWIs’ marketing of excessively limited fiscal policies and aggressive privatisation that avoid states from turning in core public offerings and assembly their international human rights obligations.

A related and intersectional thread of human rights opinions focuses on how these insurance policies supported, proposed or required with the aid of the BWIs are designed inconsistently in favour of these already at the pinnacle of the economic device and society, in addition exacerbating inequalities inside and between nations and disproportionately harming the marginalised, who already are most inclined to human rights violations. Groups that are often disproportionately and cumulatively disadvantaged via means of the kinds of macroeconomic policies the BWIs promote include the poor, women, immigrants, the elderly, youngsters and youth, ethnic and spiritual minorities, people with disabilities, and LGBTQI communities.

3.2 Causing foremost harms by enchancment projects

World Bank-funded tasks have also continuously been observed to be in direct, serious violation of global human rights standards. Major routine problems include mass evictions and the forced displacement of peoples and communities for primary infrastructure and agricultural projects (see Observer Spring 2015), violations of the rights of indigenous and woodland peoples, targeting of human rights defenders, triggering nearby food insecurity, and serious labour rights violations, such as toddler and pressured labour reportedly being used in Bank-funded tasks (see Observer Winter 2016). The IFC has also been shown on various activities to have invested in companies that avoid or sidestep taxes (see Observer Autumn 2016). More recently, the Bank has also stated that its duties can create an environment that can foster gender-based violence, together with sexual abuse and the unfold of HIV/AIDS (see Observer Spring 2017).

To defend in opposition to risks like these, the World Bank launched its revised Environmental and Social Framework in 2018, although it applies solely to its challenge lending and now not to its DPF. Many in civil society remain unconvinced that the safeguards are healthy for motive if the Bank is to furnish on its mandate to implement insurance plan policies that gain the poorest, especially as the Bank is set to center of attention on higher problematic and tough environments from 2018.

3.3 Lacking evidence for high pleasant impacts…

While preserving they have no duties under global human rights law, despite objections of myriad human rights experts and the opinion of one of the Bank’s former General Counsels, both the Bank and Fund declare their work to eradicate poverty and extend monetary make bigger and steadiness ultimately contributes to global welfare and the fulfilment of human rights, besides clear evidence. First, this ‘win-win’ scenario has been the mission of endless opinions pointing to apparent trade-offs and conflicts between ‘pro-growth’ and ‘pro-equity’ policies, such as in a paper by the IMF’s very own lookup department in 2014.

Second, according to data on poverty rates, the extensive majority of the poverty eradication completed during the closing forty years is in reality mostly attributed to China, which has certainly no longer determined the insurance prescriptions of the BWIs (see Observer Winter 2017-2018), while the IMF’s 2018 conditionality evaluation discovered pretty a few IMF programmes the place “debt overshot projections through way of fantastic margins, reflecting disappointing expand and higher fiscal deficits”, with decrease programme completion rates. Additionally, the tempo of poverty discount is reportedly slowing, whilst the quantity of people living in severe poverty in Africa is increasing, and even the way the Bank measures poverty degrees remains highly disputed. These and different evaluations identify into query the efficacy of the BWIs’ policy prescriptions more oftentimes and their theoretical possible to efficiently make contributions to the fulfilment of human rights in the first place.

3.4 …while now not measuring unfavorable impacts

At the equal time, repeated calls to measure the harmful impacts Bank and Fund insurance plan insurance policies have on the enjoyment of human rights, inclusive of systematic and comprehensive gender and inequality impact assessments, as proper as consisting of human rights considerations in the BWIs’ Debt Sustainability Assessments, whether at the macroeconomic policy or mission level, continue to be unanswered (see Observer Spring 2019).

back to top

4.    Environment

Finally, the BWIs’ method to development and economic policy, as nicely as their financing decisions, have generated long-standing and ever-more pressing criticisms associated to the security of the environment and staving off local climate change.

4.1 Growth-based mannequin unsustainable

In general, the growth-based method to poverty reduction that the World Bank and IMF every promote has substantial environmental consequences, as is evidenced by means of the usage of the deepening climate crisis. As noted by former World Bank Chief Economist Sir Nicholas Stern in 2007, “Climate alternate is a cease end result of the best market failure the world has seen.” Since their inception, the BWIs have played a formative function in supporting and abetting the world forces that have precipitated this market failure, by using advertising economic growth as the core factor of their improvement model, in spite of – as stated in the aforementioned Deaton report – mixed proof that economic enlarge and poverty discount are linked. While the Bank, and to a lesser extent, the Fund, have each greater and more tried to account for environmental and climate factors in their work over cutting-edge decades, these efforts have largely been confined to trying to combine these troubles into a growth-based improvement model.