Question

In: Economics

The United States has a trade deficit. In 2019, international trade subtracted $576.8 billion from GDP....

The United States has a trade deficit. In 2019, international trade subtracted $576.8 billion from GDP. Data on America’s import and export components show that goods and services purchased by the nation outweigh those which it sells on the global marketplace. The deficit has lowered because of the trade war initiated by President Donald Trump in March 2018. Trump's protectionist measures included a 25% tariff on steel imports and a 10% tariff on aluminum. China, the European Union, Mexico, and Canada announced retaliatory tariffs, hurting U.S. exports, and a deal was reached to remove the tariffs in May 2019. The tariffs depressed the stock market. Analysts worried that Trump started a trade war that would hurt international trade.

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership would have linked the United States and the EU, the world's largest economies. It would have controlled more than one-third of the world's total economic output. The biggest obstacle is agribusiness in the countries, as both trading partners have large subsidies for their food industries. The EU also prohibits genetically modified organisms as food and restricts antibiotics and hormones in animals raised for food. President Trump's trade war has complicated negotiations on this agreement. The United States has many other regional trade agreements and bilateral trade agreements with specific countries. It also participated in the most important multilateral trade agreement, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Although the GATT is technically defunct, its provisions live on in the World Trade Organization.

Is international trade slowing? Are you agree or disagree? What do you think about Trump's approach on International Trade agreements?

Solutions

Expert Solution

President Trump’s trade war is chilling business investment, confidence and trade flows across the world, a development that foreign leaders and business executives say is worsening a global economic slowdown that was already underway.

Recent softening in Europe, Australia and other parts of the world coincides with Mr. Trump’s intensified trade fight with China and other partners. Economists warn that further escalation by Mr. Trump — like tariffs on more Chinese goods or levies on foreign autos — could slow global growth to a crawl.

“With these trade tensions, the global economy, in a sense, is getting close to a crossroads,” said Ayhan Kose, the director of the World Bank’s Prospects Group.

Weakness in China, driven in part by fallout from the trade war, has spread to Germany, Australia and other nations, raising supply chain costs, chilling exports and worrying political and economic leaders. New york times .

I agree . Most of the Economists have already warned that these type of practices can be the end of global trade . Trade between some countries was already 0 because of the conflicts going between them and these policies have left the countries with very less choice to trade . There a lot of articles out there saying Trump will be the end of global trade and much.

Unfortunately, Trump’s policies are only an acceleration of a trend in international trade that’s been going on for several decades. It’s a move away from multilateralism – in which many countries agree on certain trading principles – and toward bilateralism – which pits nation against nation, raising the stakes.My observations lead me to believe that the increasing abandonment of multilateralism will have pernicious long-term consequences. Not only will trade become more costly for businesses and consumers, it may even make the planet a more dangerous place.

If you are still unsatisfied with my answer let me know in the comments and i will edit it as soon as possible , please leave a like if you felt that i solved your question . Thanks :)


Related Solutions

In 2005, the United States had a deficit of $318 billion and it has risen to...
In 2005, the United States had a deficit of $318 billion and it has risen to $665 billion in 2017. To save this atrocious mess, the government must implement the known saying “to make money you have to earn money.”             According to Aaron, there is money being lost in the government because agencies aren’t big enough to catch the issues. Government needs to hire more people to catch the small issues such as tax evasion, in 2015 over $500 billion...
Is having a trade deficit necessarily bad for the United States?
Is having a trade deficit necessarily bad for the United States?
Assume the GDP in the United States is at $20.5 billion dollars and has been growing...
Assume the GDP in the United States is at $20.5 billion dollars and has been growing at about 3% for the last 6 years. The unemployment rate is 4.0% and has been stable at that level for 7 months. The inflation rate is at 4.8% which is up from 2.5% two years ago. Economists at the Council of Economic Advisors estimate the NRU to be 4% and the target inflation to be 2.0%. 1. What problem(s) is the economy facing?...
The United States has experienced a large trade deficit in recent years. Analyze the implications of...
The United States has experienced a large trade deficit in recent years. Analyze the implications of a growing trade deficit on the future growth of the United States USE CITATION
It is sometimes said that a balance of trade deficit between the United States and other...
It is sometimes said that a balance of trade deficit between the United States and other nations can be harmful to the economic wellbeing of America. Explain what is the “balance of trade.” What does a “trade deficit” or a “trade surplus” mean? Why do some people say a trade deficit is “bad” and a trade surplus is “good”? Many economists reply to these arguments that, at the end of the day, it does no “harm” for a country to...
Find the most recent federal deficit as a percentage of GDP of the United States. Suppose...
Find the most recent federal deficit as a percentage of GDP of the United States. Suppose that the federal budget deficit was eliminated and there was no change in private saving. What would be the effect on the long run capital stock per worker? What would be the effect on long run output per worker?
Is having a trade deficit necessarily bad for the United States? Explain your answer.
Is having a trade deficit necessarily bad for the United States? Explain your answer.
United States has a large deficit with many of its trading partners; yet, the deficit will...
United States has a large deficit with many of its trading partners; yet, the deficit will continue to exist or may even grow larger in foreseeable future. Discuss why. (Hint: buying power of American citizens compared to citizens of other countries, over-valued dollars, freedom of choice of our citizens allowed by our government.)
United States has a large deficit with many of its trading partners; yet, the deficit will...
United States has a large deficit with many of its trading partners; yet, the deficit will continue to exist or may even grow larger in foreseeable future. Discuss why. (Hint: buying power of American citizens compared to citizens of other countries, over-valued dollars, freedom of choice of our citizens allowed by our government.)
What does United States GDP measure and what should United States GDP measure?  
What does United States GDP measure and what should United States GDP measure?  
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT