In: Statistics and Probability
The following data are from a completely randomized design.
Treatment |
|||
Observation |
A |
B |
C |
1 |
162 |
142 |
126 |
2 |
142 |
156 |
122 |
3 |
165 |
124 |
138 |
4 |
145 |
142 |
140 |
5 |
148 |
136 |
150 |
6 |
174 |
152 |
128 |
Sample Mean |
156 |
142 |
134 |
Sample Variance |
164.4 |
131.2 |
110.4 |
For the given data
Null Hypothesis
, the means of the three treatments are equal.
Alternative Hypothesis
: Atleast two of the treatments means are different
Correction Factor (CF)
a)
Sum of Squares between Treatments
Degrees of freedom for Treatments = 2
b)
Mean Sum of Squares due to treatments = 1488/2 = 744
c)
Sum of Squares Due to error
Total Sum of Squares(TSS)
Raw Sum of Squares (RSS)
TSS = RSS-CF = 376766-373248 = 3518
Error Sum of Squares(SSE) = TSS-SST = 3518 -1488 = 2030
d)
Mean Error due to square
degrees of freedom for error = N-k = 18-3 =15
MSE = 2030/15 = 135.33
e)
ANOVA Table
Source | df | SS | MS | F |
Between Treatment | k-1 = 3-1 =2 | 1488 | 744 | 744/135.33 = 5.4976 |
Within Treatment (Error) | N-k =18-3 = 15 | 2030 | 135.33 | |
Total | N-1 =17 | 3518 |
f)
Critical value of F at 0.05 level of significance for (2,15) df is 3.68
Since Calculated value of F is greater than the tabulated value of F , we reject null hypothesis at 5% level of significance and conclude that the treatments A, B and C differ significantly.
If you have any doubts please comment and please don't dislike.
PLEASE GIVE ME A LIKE. ITS VERY IMPORTANT FOR ME.