In: Economics
What are some of the economic arguments for and against
government intervention in the
market for student loans? Do you believe that class size reductions
will help student performance?
Government intervention in the market for student loans has economic arguments that are in support as well as in against also.
Economic arguments supporting government intervention for student loan market are as follows:
A. It will correct the positive externality and social equilibrium of output in terms of students education will be achieved.
B. It will build human capital in the economy and return back with more innovation, technology development and inventions. Further, it will regulate the institutions that make higher interest rates on education loan.
Economic arguments against government intervention for student loan market are as follows:
A. Government intervention causes constraints in establishing a
true market economy where demand and supply force achieve the
equilibrium.
B. Government intervention will increase the NPA of the banks and other loan providers if students make default.
Class size reductions will not
necessarily help students' performance, though it will reduce the
student to faculty ratio and faculties can give more attention to
the each students. But, the student's performance can
only be improved when teaching methodology is more pragmatic,
practical and according to the topic of study. It will make
students better understand the subject and implement in real time
world cases. So, simply reducing the class size, is not enough to
improve the student performance.