Question

In: Finance

Aliya works for an irrigation district that is considering two options for building new infrastructure to...

Aliya works for an irrigation district that is considering two options for building new infrastructure to expand irrigation. The infrastructure won’t be built for 3 years (so, capital costs will be incurred in 2023). Option A is estimated to cost $5 million in 2020 dollars. It is anticipated that Option A infrastructure could be used for 5 years, then sold for $1 million (in 2028 dollars; this estimate does not need to be adjusted). Estimated additional revenues are $4.2 million per year, and estimated additional operating costs are $1 million per year (both in 2020 dollars). Option B is estimated to cost $8 million in 2020 dollars. Aliya anticipates that Option B could be used for 5 years, then sold for $0.5 million (also in 2028 dollars). Estimated additional revenues are $5.5 million per year, and estimated additional operating costs are $1.8 million per year (both in 2020 dollars). For both options: Capital cost annual inflation is estimated to be 3%. Future revenues and future operating costs are expected to rise at 2% per year. The combined federal and provincial incremental tax rate is 45%. Use a CCA depreciation rate of 45% and a discount rate of 10% (reflecting the MARR of the firm).

a) What is the gain or loss on disposal of Option A?

b) What is the gain or loss on disposal of Option B?

c) Determine the net present worth of the after-tax cash flow for each option, assuming 2023 is year 0.

d) Which option should Ying recommend, or should she recommend not to purchase either?

This is all the information I have, let me still know any specific information you need.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given,

Evaluating option A

Step 1 : Initial Cashflows at year 2020

Investment in project = $5,000,000 as per 2020 dollars

capital cost annual inflation rate = 3%

Discounting rate = 10%

Investment amount as per 2023 dollars = Amount to invested in 2020 Inflation rate

$5,000,000 1.03 1.03 1.03 = $5,463,635

Present value of cashflows to be incurred in 2023 = $5,463,635 PvF(10%,3) = $5,000,000 0.751

= $4,103,190

Step 2 : Recurring cashflows and present value of cashflows

Yearly revenue = $4,200,000

Yearly operating cost = $ 1,000,000

CCA depriciation rate = 45%

Tax rate = 45%

Inflation rate in respect of revenue and expenditure = 2%

Particulars Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Revenue $4,200,000 $4,200,000 $4,200,000 $4,200,000 $4,200,000
Inflated Revenue $4,546,215 $4,637,139 $4,729,882 $4,824,480 $4,920,969
Opearting costs $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Inflated operating costs $1,082,432 $1,104,081 $1,126,163 $1,148,686 $1,171,660
Net opeating profit $3,463,783 $3,533,058 $3,603,719 $3,675,794 $3,749,309
Depreciation $2,250,000 $1,237,500 $680,625 $374,344 $205,889
Profit before tax $1,213,783 $2,295,558 $2,923,094 $3,301,450 $3,543,420
Tax @45% $543,202 $1,033,001 $1,315,392 $1,485,652 $1,594,539
Profit after tax $670,581 $1,262,557 $1,607,702 $1,815,798 $1,948,881

Cashflow after tax[PAT + Depreciation

$2,920,581 $2,500,057 $2,288,327 $2,189,142 $2,154,770
PvF(10%,ny) 0.683 0.621 0.564 0.513 0.466
Present value of cashflows $1,994,757 $1,552,535 $1,290,616 $1,123,030 $1,004,123

Step 3 : cashflows on disposal of infrastructure

Cashflows on sale = $1,000,000 as per 2028 dollars, so no need to inflate.

Book value = $5,000,000 - [$2,250,000+$1,237,500+$680,625+$374,344+$205,889] = $251642

Profit on sale = $1,000,000 - $251642 =$748358

Tax on sale = 336,761

Cashflow at end of project = $663,239

Present value of cashflow = $663239 0.466 = $309,069

NPV of the project = Present value of cashinflows - Present value of cashoutflows

= [$1,994,757+$1,552,535+$1,290,616+$1,123,030+$1,004,123+$309,069] - $4,103,190

= $2,170,940

Evaluating option B

Step 1 : Initial Cashflows at year 2020

Investment in project = $8,000,000 as per 2020 dollars

capital cost annual inflation rate = 3%

Discounting rate = 10%

Investment amount as per 2023 dollars = Amount to invested in 2020 Inflation rate

$8,000,000 1.03 1.03 1.03 = $8,741,816

Present value of cashflows to be incurred in 2023 = $8,741,816 PvF(10%,3) = $5,000,000 0.751

= $6,565,104

Step 2 : Recurring cashflows and present value of cashflows

Yearly revenue = $5,500,000

Yearly operating cost = $ 1,800,000

CCA depriciation rate = 45%

Tax rate = 45%

Inflation rate in respect of revenue and expenditure = 2%

Particulars Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Revenue $5,500,000 $5,500,000 $5,500,000 $5,500,000 $5,500,000
Inflated Revenue $5,953,377 $6,072,444 $6,193,893 $6,317,771 $6,444,127
Opearting costs $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000
Inflated operating costs $1,948,378 $1,987.345 $2,027,092 $2,067,634 $2,108,987
Net opeating profit $4,004,999 $4,085,099 $4,166,801 $4,250,137 $4,335,140
Depreciation $3,600,000 $1,980,000 $1,089,000 $598,950 $329,422
Profit before tax $404,999 $2,105,099 $3,077,801 $3,651,187 $4,005,718
Tax @45% $182,249 $947,294 $1,385,010 $1,643,034 $1,802,573
Profit after tax $222,749 $1,157,804 $1,692,790 $2,008,153 $2,203,145

Cashflow after tax[PAT + Depreciation

$3,822,749 $3,137,804 $2,781,790 $2,604,103 $2,532,567
PvF(10%,ny) 0.683 0.621 0.564 0.513 0.466
Present value of cashflows $2,610,937 $1,948,576 $1,568,929 $1,335,905 $1,180,176

Step 3 : cashflows on disposal of infrastructure

Cashflows on sale = $500,000 as per 2028 dollars, so no need to inflate.

Book value = $8,000,000 - [$3,600,000+$1,980,000+$1,089,000+$598,950+$329,422] = $402,628

Profit on sale = $500,000 - $402,628 =$97,372

Tax on sale = $97,372 0.45 = $43817

Cashflow at end of project = $500,000 - $43,817= $456,183

Present value of cashflow = $456183 0.466 = $212581

NPV of the project = Present value of cashinflows - Present value of cashoutflows

= [$2,610,937+$1,948,576+$1,568,929+$1,335,905+$1,180,176+$212581] - $6,565,104

= $2,292,000

Difference between NPV's

NPV as per option A = $2,170,940

NPV as per option B = $2,292,000

Difference = $121,060

Gain on disposal of option A = $121,060

Loss on disposal of option B = $121,060

Since NPV is higher as per option B, so it should be selected an the other is rejected.


Related Solutions

Aliya works for an irrigation district that is considering two options for building new infrastructure to...
Aliya works for an irrigation district that is considering two options for building new infrastructure to expand irrigation. The infrastructure won’t be built for 3 years (so, capital costs will be incurred in 2023). Option A is estimated to cost $5 million in 2020 dollars. It is anticipated that Option A infrastructure could be used for 5 years, then sold for $1 million (in 2028 dollars; this estimate does not need to be adjusted). Estimated additional revenues are $4.2 million...
The government is considering building a major infrastructure project at a cost of €200m. The expected...
The government is considering building a major infrastructure project at a cost of €200m. The expected benefits of the project are €500m. (i) Based on the Kaldor-Hicks criteria should the government implement this project? Justify your answer. (ii) A project that satisfies the Kaldor-Hicks criteria is always guaranteed to increase aggregate welfare. True or false? Explain your answer using a numerical example. In your example use the cost and benefits of the project outlined above ( approx 160 words total)
Decision You are considering the purchase of a new vehicle. There are two options for the...
Decision You are considering the purchase of a new vehicle. There are two options for the auto acquisition: a traditional gas-powered auto or a hybrid auto. Based on the information provided below and using net present value (NPV), you will be evaluating the two options and making a recommendation. Note: this scenario is a least cost decision. Since the decision to buy a car will only involve costs, you will be choosing the option with the highest NPV (which in...
Organic Farms is considering an investment in a new irrigation system that will cost $65,000 and...
Organic Farms is considering an investment in a new irrigation system that will cost $65,000 and last for four years. The firm's cost of capital, appropriate for this project, is 8.00% per year. The incremental free cash flows for the irrigation project are as follows: Year Free Cash Flows 0 -$65,000 1 20,300 2 20,300 3 20,300 4 20,300 Compute the NPV for the project. Identify the correct formula used to solve the previous problem. Compute the IRR for the...
A municipal water authority is considering the installation of a new water system. Two options are...
A municipal water authority is considering the installation of a new water system. Two options are being considered. The first option is a steel pipeline with an installation cost of $225 million. Annual maintenance and pumping costs begin at $15 million and increase by $1.0 million per year. The second option is a gravity fed concrete canal with an installation cost of $400 million. Annual maintenance costs begin at $0.5 million and increase by $0.4 million per year. The water...
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options....
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options. An underground automatic irrigation system will cost $9.2 million to install and $80,500 pre-tax annually to operate. It will not have to be replaced for 20 years. An aboveground system will cost $6.8 million to install, but $195,000 per year to operate. The aboveground equipment has an effective operating life of nine years. The country club leases its land from the city and both...
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options....
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options. An underground automatic irrigation system will cost $9.2 million to install and $82,000 pre-tax annually to operate. It will not have to be replaced for 20 years. An aboveground system will cost $6.8 million to install, but $210,000 per year to operate. The aboveground equipment has an effective operating life of nine years. The country club leases its land from the city and both...
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options....
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options. An underground automatic irrigation system will cost $9.2 million to install and $81,200 pre-tax annually to operate. It will not have to be replaced for 20 years. An aboveground system will cost $6.8 million to install, but $202,000 per year to operate. The aboveground equipment has an effective operating life of nine years. The country club leases its land from the city and both...
The local community is considering two options to raise money to finance a new football stadium....
The local community is considering two options to raise money to finance a new football stadium. The first option is to institute a per unit tax on restaurant meals of $2.00. The market demand and supply functions for restaurant meals are: QD=80,000 -1000P QS=19,000P - 220,000 Round to the nearest whole number; no decimals, commas, or dollar signs. a) Calculate consumer  and producer surplus with the per unit tax. The second option the community is considering implementing is an income tax....
The local community is considering two options to raise money to finance a new football stadium....
The local community is considering two options to raise money to finance a new football stadium. The first option is to institute a per unit tax on restaurant meals of $2.00. The market demand and supply functions for restaurant meals are: Qd=80,000-1,000P Qs=19,000P-220,000 Round to the nearest whole number. a) Calculate consumer and producer surplus with the per unit tax. The second option the community is considering implementing is an income tax. If an income tax is implemented, the new...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT