the statement
represents that the government wants to monopolize the production
of such goods not because government is able to produce or private
sector is inefficient of producing it, but to prevent the interest
of people belonging to all income level group.
we can understand the concept with following example-
- suppose
government of a country produces some vaccines and no private firm
is entitled to produce such vaccinies.this vaccine prevent the
infants from various diseases and anyone can get their new born
child this vaccine free of cost.this means the vaccine is similar
to a public good.
- now suppose if
this vaccine was produced by the private firm and the firm had its
patents,then the price of per vaccine would have been high and only
a few people or higher income group people could get the vaccine
for their children.
we can consider another example-
- suppose in a
country, government is operating railway services.government is
providing a train service from an urban area to a rural area,but in
monetary term the railways is not earning any profit or even it is
earning loss,but eventually the people belonging to rural area are
getting service and furthermore they are able to continue their
jobs in the urban area and thus there is a social benefit of this
service.
- now suppose if
the railways would have been operated by the private sectors,in
this scenario the private sector would have operated only those
trains which were beneficial for them and helped them to earn more
and more profit.they would have ignored the interest of people and
have profit motive.
from the above examples we can observe that, is some cases
government's intervention becomes necessary to prevent the interest
of lower level group and to maintain equality.