Question

In: Economics

“Both private goods and club goods are excludable, so there are no reasons for the government to regulate or tax private goods and club goods producers.”

 

1. “Both private goods and club goods are excludable, so there are no reasons for the government to regulate or tax private goods and club goods producers.” Do you agree with this statement? Justify your answer.

2. Explain why does an increase in the price of ivory threatens the elephant population in Africa, while an increase in the price of beef protects the cow farms in Texas.

3. “When the market-equilibrium quantity of good “x” is larger than the socially-optimal quantity of good “x,” the production of good “x” conveys a positive externality.” Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer

Thank you!

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer 1:

It is true that both club goods and private goods are excludable because only those who pay for usage of these goods are able to derive benefit from these goods. Thus, government intervention to regulation the optimum level of club goods and private goods is not needed in the market of these goods. However, in some cases where the good is harmful for people like tobacco or in case of club goods where the good is non rival in nature, goods needs to tax these goods in the interest of people to prevent over use of the good.

Answer 2;

As the price of ivory increases, the elephant population is at threat because it is an important part of elephant's body and people will start hunting for elephant to collect ivories and this reduces elephant's population in the area. As price of beef increases, demand for beef will decrease in the market and as demand decreases, the producers will be less willing to sell their product in the market and thus sale of beef decreases which helps in protection of cow farms in Texas.

Answer 3:

Yes, the statement is true. When the market equilibrium quantity of good X is larger than the socially optimal quantity of good X because external damage caused by the good is not taken into consideration, then production of good X conveys negative externality. Taxes are imposed to increase cost of production and move the socially efficient level of quantity equal to market efficient level of quantity.


Related Solutions

What are the reasons for government involvement in both public and private health care? Why do...
What are the reasons for government involvement in both public and private health care? Why do people purchase health insurance?
Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola producers a tax. Before the tax, 50...
Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola producers a tax. Before the tax, 50 million cases of cola were sold every month at a price of $7 per case. After the tax, 44 million cases of cola are sold every month; consumers pay $10 per case, and producers receive $4 per case (after paying the tax).
If the government imposes a new tax on producers of apples, what happens in the market...
If the government imposes a new tax on producers of apples, what happens in the market for apples? Question 17 options: A) There is an increase in supply. B) There is a decreased in supply. C) There will be a decrease in demand. D) There is an increase in the quantity demanded.
Should the government regulate derivatives more than they do now? If so, why?
Should the government regulate derivatives more than they do now? If so, why?
Suppose you are advising the government on sales tax. Should the government tax inelastic goods such...
Suppose you are advising the government on sales tax. Should the government tax inelastic goods such as food and medicine or inelastic goods such as Netflix and Hulu subscriptions if the goal of the tax is not to be distortionary? (In which scenario would the tax have the smallest effect on quantity).
Government has an advantage over private producers: it has the coercive power to solve some kinds...
Government has an advantage over private producers: it has the coercive power to solve some kinds of market failures. Does government use that power properly? Does government have any disadvantages relative to private producers?
tastykreme and krispy kake are both producers of baked goods, but each has followed a different...
tastykreme and krispy kake are both producers of baked goods, but each has followed a different production strategy. The differences in their strategies resulted in differences in their cost structure, as shown in the following table: TastyKreme and Krispy Kake Estimated sales in units: 20,000 and 35,000 Unit price: 6 and 8 Variable cost per unit: 3 and 3 Total fixed costs: 30,000 and 105,000 a) Compute the operating income and degree of operating leverage for each company b) Assuming...
Explain why the government produces goods, the private sector can and does produce, while the private...
Explain why the government produces goods, the private sector can and does produce, while the private sector will not produce the products ONLY the government can and will produce
5. We can consider the case where wine producers in Chile ask the government to tax...
5. We can consider the case where wine producers in Chile ask the government to tax imported wines from France with a tax. They consider that this tax would increase both the State's tax revenue and employment in the Chilean wine industry. What kind of economic argument is this in relation to international trade? Do you agree or not with the argument presented by wine producers in Chile? If the state government adopts this position, does it consider it to...
Explain which category (Public Good, Private Good, Club Good or Common Resources)  each of the following goods...
Explain which category (Public Good, Private Good, Club Good or Common Resources)  each of the following goods falls into and why: police protection snow plowing education rural roads city streets Why do you think the government provides items that are not public goods? (free-riding)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT