In: Statistics and Probability
An oceanographer believes that the median height of the waves at Ocean City is 2.8 feet. The wave heights are measured for a random sample of 20 days. The data are as shown here. At , is there enough evidence to reject the oceanographer’s claim?
3.6 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
3.2 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
1.8 |
2.3 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
Ho: data is normal
H1: data is not normal
Shapiro-Wilk Test | |
3.6 | |
W-stat | 0.946107 |
p-value | 0.338562 |
alpha | 0.05 |
normal | yes |
conclusion: data is normal
-----------
for non parameteric
H0:median=2.8 ( claim ),
H1:median not equal 2.8
signed test
x1 | x2 | difference |
3.6 | 2.8 | 0.8 |
3.2 | 2.8 | 0.4 |
2 | 2.8 | -0.8 |
1.8 | 2.8 | -1 |
2.1 | 2.8 | -0.7 |
3.9 | 2.8 | 1.1 |
1.9 | 2.8 | -0.9 |
2.3 | 2.8 | -0.5 |
2.3 | 2.8 | -0.5 |
3.4 | 2.8 | 0.6 |
3.2 | 2.8 | 0.4 |
3.7 | 2.8 | 0.9 |
2.1 | 2.8 | -0.7 |
3 | 2.8 | 0.2 |
3.5 | 2.8 | 0.7 |
3.9 | 2.8 | 1.1 |
2.7 | 2.8 | -0.1 |
2.9 | 2.8 | 0.1 |
2.8 | 2.8 | 0 |
4.2 | 2.8 | 1.4 |
total negative sign = 8
total positive sign = 12
n=20
test statistic = min (8,12) = 8
p value= 2*P(X≤6) = 2*BINOM.DIST(8,20,0.5,TRUE) = 0.5034
since, p value >α=0.05, fail to reject Ho
hence, there is no enough evidence to reject the claim that median is 2.8
===========