In: Statistics and Probability
We assume that our wages will increase as we gain experience and become more valuable to our employers. Wages also increase because of inflation. By examining a sample of employees at a given point in time, we can look at part of the picture. How does length of service (LOS) relate to wages? The data here (data45.dat) is the LOS in months and wages for 60 women who work in Indiana banks. Wages are yearly total income divided by the number of weeks worked. We have multiplied wages by a constant for reasons of confidentiality.
(a) Plot wages versus LOS. Consider the relationship and whether
or not linear regression might be appropriate. (Do this on paper.
Your instructor may ask you to turn in this graph.)
(b) Find the least-squares line. Summarize the significance test
for the slope. What do you conclude?
Wages = | + LOS |
t = | |
P = |
(c) State carefully what the slope tells you about the relationship
between wages and length of service.
As increase 1 unit in the independent variable (wages), the
average change in the dependent variable (Los) is ??//.
This answer has not been graded yet.
(d) Give a 95% confidence interval for the slope.
( , )
worker wages los size 1 37.3992 63 Large 2 64.7929 102 Small 3 38.495 38 Small 4 66.1083 124 Small 5 38.6552 102 Large 6 52.1579 39 Small 7 46.307 70 Large 8 45.7795 41 Large 9 43.4066 59 Large 10 71.3603 32 Small 11 45.8326 84 Large 12 46.8145 31 Small 13 40.8481 19 Small 14 58.1816 152 Large 15 49.0047 153 Large 16 65.035 147 Large 17 57.275 32 Large 18 58.6007 139 Small 19 47.7213 93 Large 20 59.5509 73 Large 21 48.8784 83 Large 22 66.2058 19 Small 23 60.7252 34 Large 24 50.6957 40 Small 25 41.0456 20 Large 26 46.4612 68 Small 27 42.5717 117 Small 28 42.7551 16 Large 29 40.3404 36 Large 30 37.1373 27 Large 31 94.0428 19 Small 32 64.1811 27 Large 33 65.1248 95 Large 34 39.5958 85 Small 35 50.6298 114 Large 36 85.5969 82 Large 37 44.2446 43 Large 38 40.3853 89 Small 39 54.0249 73 Large 40 41.7716 84 Small 41 53.0517 70 Small 42 71.1145 77 Small 43 100.6858 25 Large 44 56.1299 65 Small 45 42.312 97 Large 46 44.9882 27 Small 47 44.392 73 Large 48 43.9313 144 Large 49 43.1781 70 Small 50 80.845 144 Large 51 48.5315 133 Large 52 74.1724 87 Large 53 38.8199 95 Large 54 56.2838 44 Small 55 46.4557 173 Small 56 38.1081 87 Large 57 72.9656 44 Small 58 49.6886 67 Large 59 41.4145 23 Small 60 61.6381 27 Large
a)
linear regression does not seem appropriate
b)
SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.0295 | |||||
R Square | 0.0009 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | -0.0164 | |||||
Standard Error | 14.4096 | |||||
Observations | 60 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 1 | 10.4846 | 10.4846 | 0.0505 | 0.8230 | |
Residual | 58 | 12042.9503 | 207.6371 | |||
Total | 59 | 12053.4349 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
Intercept | 54.0444 | 3.7706 | 14.3333 | 0.0000 | 46.4968 | 61.5920 |
los | -0.0102 | 0.0454 | -0.2247 | 0.8230 | -0.1010 | 0.0806 |
y^ = 54.0444 - 0.0102 x
t = -0.2247
P = 0.8230
c)
As increase 1 unit in the independent variable (wages), the average change in the dependent variable (Los) is 0.0102 less
d)
95% confidence interval of slope = (-0.1010,0.0806)